On Wed, 12 May 1999, Ansel wrote: > Shouldn't ELKS ultimately be able to run on systems without a BIOS? Yes, in the future it should. Userspace programs should not use BIOS, however in the kernel it is required sometimes, for example to do some disk operations and the like. However all of the BIOS stuff should be kept in the arch/ tree, as I beieve most of it already is. Davey
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Eric J. Korpela
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Shane Kerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Riley Williams
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Ansel
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Dan Olson
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Jakob Eriksson
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Eric J. Korpela
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Gray, David W.
