> >easily handle. Personally I'm of the opinion that using the BIOS for
> >everything possible is a great shortcut. Lots of device drivers talk to
> Shouldn't ELKS ultimately be able to run on systems without a BIOS?
I was going to suggest this a *long* time ago, but never did. What about
using a file with BIOS info as is done with CP/M, then a machine need not
be IBM-compatable or a built in BIOS to run ELKs. Any thoughts?
Dan
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Shane Kerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Riley Williams
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Ansel
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Dan Olson
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Jakob Eriksson
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Eric J. Korpela
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Gray, David W.
