Hi Greg.
> The point about ELKS being currently limited to 64k code is a
> very good one. I think we're kind of nearing that limit, aren't
> we?
We almost need to copy the trick MSDOS used of having the operating
system in two parts. In MSDOS, they were called IO.SYS and MSDOS.SYS
respectively, but I'd suggest using more elks-centric names, such as
SysCore and SysWrapper perhaps?
Best wishes from Riley.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
* http://www.MemAlpha.cx/kernel.versions.html
