Linux-Advocacy Digest #246, Volume #28 Sat, 5 Aug 00 07:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Miky Crackhead Byrns....COMNA coward ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: God damm Microsoft ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: God damm Microsoft ("-==-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:22:12 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Mike Byrns wrote:
> > >
> > > "Drestin Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:39879d71$0$33843$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > >
> > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > You dare to claim "unix boxes are essential to running
> microsoft.com?"
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes. And based on the existance of Unix boxes at microsoft.com,
> > > > > Microsoft believes this, too.
> > > >
> > > > Prove it or continue to be considered the poorest liar on usenet
> > >
> > > Let me take this opportunity to greet you, Mr. Black. If you've read my
> > > posts I think you know that I am a Windows advocate. I hope that you
> take
> > > this the way that I intended it as USENET can mask the intentions of the
> > > most well mannered poster but I fail to see what you hope to gain for we
> > > Windows advocates by posting things like this? If you have a personal
> beef
> > > with these folks, and I think that you do if Mr. Kulkis is to be
> believed,
> > > then I suggest that you counter him in a more appropriate forum. Like
> the
> > > parking lot. nix folks are, in my experience, less concerned with
> physical
> > > fitness than Windows folks are with the former preferring donuts to
> barbells
> > > :-)
> >
> > 1. I'm a combat veteran.
> > 2. I'm still a soldier to this day
> > 3. I'm in the infantry
> > 4. Fuck with me and I will kill you.
> > 5. That's a promise.
>
> OK, consider me fucking with you.
>
> You can't prove anything else you've claimed in any thread (still waiting on
> that unix runs ms.com crap) - lets see you deliver on this promise... You
> can even light one up to steady ya like back in the day
The context was clearly one of physical confrontation.
Besides, I'm already beating the crap out of you in the
battle of wits; Your forces are AWOL.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Miky Crackhead Byrns....COMNA coward
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:24:15 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > >
> > > > 1. I'm a combat veteran.
> > > > 2. I'm still a soldier to this day
> > > > 3. I'm in the infantry
> > > > 4. Fuck with me and I will kill you.
> > > > 5. That's a promise.
> > >
> >
> > > > Come to Detroit and try me, coward.
>
> OK, no problemo. Cornor of Central & Michigan, midnite, tonight. Look for my
> red Viper...
Drestin didn't show.
Figures.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:26:09 -0400
Drestin Black wrote:
>
> I don't think so. I read about the history of microsoft.com and I do not
> believe they ever used anything but NT on their site.
When has Microsoft ever been known to tell the truth, the
WHOLE truth, and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
?
>
> "Sean LeBlanc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > Whoops, Drestin you just dug yourself a hole with the word EVER;
> > Microsoft used to use Solaris on their website...of course, I
> > don't have references, but that was a long time ago anyway...
> > but they did use it at one time, of that you can be sure.
> > And yes, it was for www.microsoft.com.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sean
> >
> > "Drestin Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > You dare to claim "unix boxes are essential to running
> microsoft.com?"
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes. And based on the existance of Unix boxes at microsoft.com,
> > > > Microsoft believes this, too.
> > >
> > > Prove it or continue to be considered the poorest liar on usenet
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You're the one that argues that Microsoft doesn't need Unix to run
> > > > their websight, when each machine costs them a good $100,000 more
> > > > than if they were using their home grown LoseNT and Lose2000
> shitholes.
> > >
> > > That is correct. MS does not need now nor has EVER at any time
> whatsoever
> > > used Unix to run www.microsoft.com. I challenge you to disprove that
> > > statement. Go ahead, or are you just a big bag of bullshit? are you a
> huge
> > > liar? full of unix dreams and wishes never fulfilled. There are some
> unix
> > > boxes at CD production plants that produce MS CDs, sure, but a unix box
> > > producing www.microsoft.com output? hahahahahahha keep dreaming liar.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:27:10 -0400
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
> "Sean LeBlanc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > I seriously doubt that, esp. considering the state of NT back in 1993,
> > but I can't come up with any references at the moment.
> >
> > I am nearly positive that their ftp site(s) ran Solaris, however.
>
> I logged onto MS's ftp site back in about 92/93. And it was definately
> running on some kind of MS box, ftp was giving me the . and .. directories
> when I did an ls, and it was generally non-standard. I don't remember what
> else there was, but it really made me think it was running on DOS. They
> ddin't get a web site until like 94.
Name one webserver that ran on DOS in 1994.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:28:15 -0400
abraxas wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Mike Byrns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "petilon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> "John Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> You are not load balancing SQL.
> >> >>
> >> >> i.e., you are lying again.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Can you prove this? Im currently working on a system like
> >> > this so if its all in my imagination I would love to know.
> >>
> >> Yes, I can prove it. But first you are going to have to explain
> >> what you understand by the term "load balancing", with respect
> >> to a DBMS. If we don't start with a definition then I cannot
> >> prove anything because you are simply going to redefine "load
> >> balancing" to mean something else.
> >
> > You provide the definition then. We'll assess it's validity by citing
> > impartial industry sources.
>
> Its worth noting at this point that microsoft's version of load balancing
> has exactly nothing to do with anyone elses.
Why is this not in the least bit surprising.
Tell us...what is the new MS-DE-fenition?
>
> -----yttrx
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:29:19 -0400
petilon wrote:
>
> "Mike Byrns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> You are not load balancing SQL.
> >> >>
> >> >> i.e., you are lying again.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Can you prove this? Im currently working on a system like
> >> > this so if its all in my imagination I would love to know.
> >>
> >> Yes, I can prove it. But first you are going to have to
> >> explain what you understand by the term "load balancing",
> >> with respect to a DBMS. If we don't start with a definition
> >> then I cannot prove anything because you are simply going
> >> to redefine "load balancing" to mean something else.
> >
> > You provide the definition then. We'll assess it's validity by
> > citing impartial industry sources. It will then be amended
> > and agreed on. Then the arguments will begin. Or is that too
> > rational and proper for an advocacy newsgroup?
>
> All right, tell me if you agree the following is a required
> attribute of a load-balanced cluster:
>
> In a load-balanced cluster, the loss of one server may degrade
> system performance, but it will not stop the entire system. The
> remaining servers in the cluster rebalance the load until a
> replacement server can be plugged in to the cluster.
>
> In other words, if a server dies, the workload of that server
> will be distributed to the surviving servers.
>
> For example, if there are 12 machines and one machine dies,
> the workload of the dead machine will be distributed to the
> 11 surviving machines.
>
> Do you agree?
>
> Do you also agree that a DBMS that claims to supports load
> balancing should support load balancing for read-write and
> not just read-only data?
>
> Do you further agree that in order for the DBMS server to
> be considered up and running, all parts of the database have
> to be up and running?
Must....not...ask..........embarrassing....questions.....
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
> Up to 100 minutes free!
> http://www.keen.com
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:33:09 -0400
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" escribi�:
>
> > I was purchasing stock at the age of 12 with money I earned
> > DELIVERING NEWSPAPERS.
>
> Then why did you have only $100 a month when you were in
> college?
It payed for my first year of college.
OUT OF STATE tuition, mind you.
>
> --
> Roberto Alsina
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: God damm Microsoft
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:37:29 -0400
Spud wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Spud wrote:
> > >
> > > [snips]
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:8lptq6$ti1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > In article <TKZf5.2555$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > > "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Outlook uses a common base service of the OS which is being
> > > patched,
> > > > which
> > > > > is why both Outlook and Outlook Express suffer from the same
> > > problem.
> > > > > Fixing one, fixes both.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, even so. I don't think you HAVE to reboot. MS often says
> > > you
> > > > should,
> > > > > but that's a default response.
> > > >
> > > > WOW, that's intuitive! Just how is the common users suposed to know
> > > when
> > > > to reboot and when not to? More MS BS.
> > >
> > > Common users aren't trying to roll out 50 machines worth of patches at
> > > a go. :)
> > >
> > > Besides, if a single user is doing it on a single system, big deal;
> > > it's a minute or two, tops.
> >
> > Yeah, it is a big deal. Rebooting is WASTED TIME.
>
> If your time is SO valuable that wasting a minute or 2, tops, of it each
> time the netadmin rolls out an upgrade - which presumably happens maybe
> twice a year, tops - then how do you have so much time to post so much noise
> here?
Because, unlike you LoseDroids, Unix people have LOTS and LOTS of
time on their hands.
You see, a minute here, 5 minutes there...and you Windows losers
end up spending your whole day accomplishing no more than what I
accomplish in the first hour of my work day.
And since...Unix is so much more stable to begin with...I typically
have 6-7 hours of free time at work... EVERY DAY.
Oh...and guess what...I earn a hell of a lot more than you, too.
Doesn't that really fucking bite?
I sit around all day, posting to USENET, getting paid more than
you....and you're working your ass off.
Doesn't that really suck?
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "-=<\(the qcc\)>=-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: God damm Microsoft
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:01:56 +0100
Just an observation Aaron,
Why not spend some of this earned income and re-educate yourself into the
wonders of manners and ettiquette (NB, not the internet version).
Why swear to make your point? It really does show bad breding and possibly
limited intellect, and you do tend to lose all credibility.
Be seeing you.
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Spud wrote:
> >
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Spud wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [snips]
> > > >
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:8lptq6$ti1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > In article <TKZf5.2555$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > > > "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Outlook uses a common base service of the OS which is being
> > > > patched,
> > > > > which
> > > > > > is why both Outlook and Outlook Express suffer from the same
> > > > problem.
> > > > > > Fixing one, fixes both.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, even so. I don't think you HAVE to reboot. MS often says
> > > > you
> > > > > should,
> > > > > > but that's a default response.
> > > > >
> > > > > WOW, that's intuitive! Just how is the common users suposed to
know
> > > > when
> > > > > to reboot and when not to? More MS BS.
> > > >
> > > > Common users aren't trying to roll out 50 machines worth of patches
at
> > > > a go. :)
> > > >
> > > > Besides, if a single user is doing it on a single system, big deal;
> > > > it's a minute or two, tops.
> > >
> > > Yeah, it is a big deal. Rebooting is WASTED TIME.
> >
> > If your time is SO valuable that wasting a minute or 2, tops, of it each
> > time the netadmin rolls out an upgrade - which presumably happens maybe
> > twice a year, tops - then how do you have so much time to post so much
noise
> > here?
>
> Because, unlike you LoseDroids, Unix people have LOTS and LOTS of
> time on their hands.
>
> You see, a minute here, 5 minutes there...and you Windows losers
> end up spending your whole day accomplishing no more than what I
> accomplish in the first hour of my work day.
>
> And since...Unix is so much more stable to begin with...I typically
> have 6-7 hours of free time at work... EVERY DAY.
>
> Oh...and guess what...I earn a hell of a lot more than you, too.
>
> Doesn't that really fucking bite?
>
>
> I sit around all day, posting to USENET, getting paid more than
> you....and you're working your ass off.
>
>
> Doesn't that really suck?
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
> B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
>
> C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
> sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
> that she doesn't like.
>
> D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
>
> E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (D) above.
>
> F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
> response until their behavior improves.
>
> G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
