Linux-Advocacy Digest #649, Volume #28 Sat, 26 Aug 00 13:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Windows stability: Alternate shells? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Just how dense is Aaron? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:36:55 -0400
Jack Troughton wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:28:34, "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> The fact that so many citizens wouldn't recognise the Constitution if it
> >> were staple to their forehead helps as well.
> >
> >Sad, but true.
> >
>
> Wow, are you guys ever arrogant.
Evidently, you are unaware of the number of high school seniors (who
*just* had a "government" class) who could not identify key phrases
from the US Constitution. Some even believed that Leninist slogans
were actually in the USC.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:38:12 -0400
Eric Bennett wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Courageous
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I'd rather see them starve to death before they start doing damage.
> >
> > You are a hazard to the liberatarian party. With adherents
> > like you, it's no wonder our support is so low.
> >
>
> Maybe you can get him to join the Reform Party. (Hey, it helped the
> Republicans get rid of Buchanan...)
Pat Buchanan is a socialist.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:39:07 -0400
Joe Ragosta wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Eric Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> >
> > > >The only way the government can "improve education" is to get out of
> > > >the education business.
> > >
> > > The government isn't a business, and institutional education isn't a
> > > profitable business, by definition.
> >
> > There are lots of private universities parents can send their children
> > to. They are organized as nonprofit organizations. Government-run
> > institutions are not *necessary* there. So, why should they be
> > necessary in other areas?
>
> There are also private elementary and high schools which don't receive
> government funding.
>
> In many cases, they provide superior education for less cost per student.
You misspelled "almost all of the time"
>
> >
> > > Said JS/PL in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
> > >
> > > >The government cannot improve the current government provided
> > > >education,
> > > >only competition in a free market can "improve a product or service".
> >
> > But the government can be part of the free market. My undergraduate
> > degree is from Penn State, which (1) is a public institution, (2) is
> > better than a lot of private schools, and (3) has served a *huge* number
> > of Americans, having the largest alumni association in the country. You
> > want to tell all these people that they're not allowed to go to this
> > excellent school any more? You want them to go to some inferior private
> > school instead?
>
> Actually, JS/PL's position would be that if Penn State didn't exist, the
> private universities that would spring up would be less expensive and
> better.
>
> I see libertarianism as a positive thing as long as it's a direction to
> move from the current system. As soon as we got very close to the
> Libertarian Manifesto, I'd be very concerned. But most of the time,
> that's the direction we should be going.
>
> The trick is to know when to stop. ;-)
true
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Joe Ragosta
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~jragosta/complmac.htm
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:40:59 -0400
"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>
> Said Joe Ragosta in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...]
> >> The only *ethical* income tax structure is when the wealthy pay a larger
> >
> >Depends on your definition of "ethical".
> >
> >What you mean is that in your opinion, that's the right thing to do.
>
> I can appreciate your confusion, since you aren't necessarily familiar
> with the term "ethics" in the accurate, consistent, and practical manner
> in which I use it. But if I had meant "its the right thing to do, in my
> opinion", I would have said that it is the only *moral* income tax
> structure. But I try not to discuss morals, as they are a private
> concern and have passingly little to do with *ethics*.
>
> I meant what I said, and I'll stick by it.
>
> >> percentage of their income (for the privilege of enjoying the
> >> civilization which gave them wealth) than the poor people (who may,
> >
> >I don't think very many people argue that.
> >
> >Even Forbes (one of the most outspoken advocates of the rights of people
> >who make lots of money) advocated a plan where the first $30 K of income
> >was tax free--which means that people earning less than that didn't pay
> >any tax and those above that paid a lower percentage the lower their
> >income.
>
> This is a point in favor of Forbes plan. The point, however, is not
> followed up, and a flat tax is, as I described before (based on Clarke's
> argument) is "an invitation to rebellion".
>
> >> additionally, require assistance to support the civilization which the
> >> rich people benefit from). The only two question are:
> >>
> >> 1) How much greater a proportion should the wealthy pay?
> >
> >A lot less than today.
>
> Considering they're still getting richer, and the poor are still getting
> poorer, I fail to see why this would be so.
>
> >You have to make something like $20 to 30 K before you pay any taxes.
> >Meanwhile, I'm paying 50% of my income in taxes (all taxes combined).
> >
> >That's an absurd difference.
>
> Maybe from your perspective. Try living on $24,000 a year with a family
> of 3.
It wouldn't be too much to ask to REFRAIN FROM HAVING KIDS THAT
YOU FUCKING CAN'T AFFORD, would it?
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:46:59 -0400
Shocktrooper wrote:
>
> "ZnU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe
> > Ragosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ZnU
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "JS/PL"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "ZnU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm certainly for reforming the system. But starving it for cash is
> > > > > > _not_ the way to do that.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's the only way to do it. You call it "starving it for cash" others
> > > > > call
> > > > > it reducing government waste. A businessman would be in prison if he
> > > > > mismanaged his finances as poorly as government does.
> > > >
> > > > If you starve it to death, millions of people who have been paying in
> > > > won't get anything out. That's straight-out theft.
> > >
> > > Actually, "theft" is a pretty good way to describe Social Security.
> > >
> > > The vast majority of the money you've paid in has been spent on previous
> > > benefits -- it's not being saved for your retirement.
> > >
> > > I thought even "tax and spend"ers knew that.
> >
> > This really has no meaning. The money you put in a bank isn't all
> > sitting there either, there's just and understanding that when you need
> > it, you can get it.
>
> So you have a deposite reciept showing ownership of your SS funds.. and that fund is
>fully insured?
>
> There is a difference: by law, the bank has to give it back. If they go belly up,
>yer protected by the FDIC.
>
> With SS, there is no law stating they have to give it back.
> If SS goes belly up, yer hosed.
^^
You misspelled "when"
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows stability: Alternate shells?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:50:10 -0400
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
> "mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >All that is irrelevant. Your argument was lack of source code. My
> argument
> > >is that it's available if you absolutely need it. Price is not an issue
> for
> > >a company like AT&T.
> >
> > Price is an issue for all companies. The idea that large companies have,
> > simply because they are large, infinite funds, is at best flawed.
>
> Price is not an issue in a situation like this. Companies spend billions of
> dollars on redundant hardware. A fraction of that for source liscensing is
> par for the course.
>
> > Or were you joking?
>
> AT&T spends more money on research that it shelves and never uses than it
> would cost to buy a windows source liscense.
Which is smart.
If they get a windows source license, and then customize it, then
Bill will drain them like a bathtub.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just how dense is Aaron?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:50:45 -0400
Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > Ed Cogburn wrote:
> > >
> > > No, you're going to deal with it. Your going to spend most of
> > > your usenet time in c.o.l.a. embroiled in flames over your sig, wasting
> > > your time as well as eveyone elses. If I chose to ignore you from now on,
> > > I suffer no penalty, but there will always be someone else who complains
> > > about your sig, which then starts another flame war. Think about all
> > > the time your going to be wasting defending a pointless sig, time lost
> > > to fighting the battles that you want to fight here, never mind all the
> > > people who will no longer read *anything* you have to say because
> > > they've killfiled you over your stupid sig. Just how dense are you?
> >
> > Isn't it hypocritical to waste bandwidth discussing wasted bandwidth...
>
> You started this trend, I'm just learning from you .... you aren't
> shutting me up that easily.
>
Personally, I don't care about wasted bandwidth.
Your move.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 08:26:07 -0400
JS/PL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>"ZnU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> In article <8o13e4$21d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> > ZnU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > -- snip --
>> >
>> > > > > If the Republicans did all the work to balance the budget, why
>> > > > > are they trying to damn hard to unbalance it?
>> > > >
>> > > > Are you, ZnU, smoking large amounts of crack before writing to
>> > > > USENET?
>> > >
>> > > Are you really denying this? In just the last few months the
>> > > Republicans have tried to pass two tax cuts that would eliminate or
>> > > significantly reduce the surplus, and Bush wants to take things even
>> > > farther.
>> >
>> > When did you get it into your head that having a surplus indicates
>> > having a balanced budget? No, either way, surplus or deficit, the
>> > budget is not balanced. It's only balanced when expenditures equal
>> > revenues.
>> >
>> > If that's what the Republicans seek, then what's the problem? I sure as
>> > hell don't want the gov't sitting on *my* money, interest free. I'd
>> > rather spend it on something nice, rather than letting Dems spend it for
>> > me.
>>
>> It isn't really a surplus, it's just money they haven't decided what to
>> do with yet. Gore wants better education, targeted tax cuts for the less
>> fortunate, better healthcare and debt reduction. Bush wants tax breaks
>> for his rich friends and unnecessary defense spending.
>You mean Bush wants to give people their money back instead of spending it
>for them!? How absurd! And he wants to defend the country! That's insanity!
When are you going to stop inflicting yourself on the world? Defend the
country in rightwing nut job speak -- is more then saying while we spend more
on arms then the rest of the world combined -- we still don't have enough.
Ya know, I've always wondered if the right, which also gets upset over
anything that involves that word (sex), really wants more and ever bigger
weapons because they need a substitute for not being able to get it up.
And no. Bush does not want to give people back their money. He wants to give
part of the so called surplus -- which is actually SS tax money being paid by
the current working class (that is just about everyone but the rich) -- to
the rich. Its no wonder he and the right want to kill SS.
===========================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 08:57:45 -0400
JS/PL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>"ZnU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >
>> > You mean Bush wants to give people their money back instead of
>> > spending it for them!? How absurd!
>>
>> Bush wants to make the rich richer instead of helping the poor stay
>> healthy and educated.
>That's SOOOO OLD. Nothing is that simple. It's more of a 50 year old
>democratic slogan than anything. Not even worthy of argument except to say
>95% of the poor are in that situation by choice, it's the five out of 100
>poor that need a hand.
And you comments are SOOOOO Old. Tell us the age breakdown of people who are
classified poor, and then explain how they really want to be poor.
>> > And he wants to defend the country! That's insanity!
>>
>> Yeah, you never know when the Brits might try to invade again!
>>
>> Seriously, the major threat to the US these days is terrorism, and the
>> kind of military spending Bush wants to do doesn't do a damn thing to
>> protect us from that.
>Actually the major threat is a first strike nuclear attack from any of the
>ever increasing 3rd world nations who are aquiring the technology. A defense
>that eliminates the strike mid-launch is the cure. Bush want this problem
>eliminated, Gore wants to bury his head in the sand and pretend it won't
>happen, let alone WHEN.
So, tell the name of the third-world nations that have an ICBM capable of
hitting the US -- then explain how it is that you or anyone knows this is a
threat even though all of our espionage devices have failed to identify any
such ICBM capability by a third-world nation. Then explain why we should
believe the so called experts who have utterly and completely failed every
attempt to build any working anti-missile system -- when they claim they can
do it now. -- Note that we now know that every test during the raygun ron
years that didn't fail was rigged.
===========================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:53:38 -0400
"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>
> Said Aaron R. Kulkis in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
> [...]
> >For your information...WORKERS always get paid.
>
> Tell that to all the WORKERS who got laid off while the company was
> still making profits and the executives were making millions in stock
> options.
It's happened to me. No big deal. I went out and got another
job... FOR MORE MONEY.
>
> >OWNERS only get paid if there's anything left over after paying workers.
>
> Bullshit. Are you talking about partners or proprietors, or investors?
> There's a difference, you know. Investors get paid *first*, because the
> whole show closes without them. You are correct that OWNERS who are
> proprietors or partners get paid last. But they'll still lay the
> employees off before taking much of a cut in income themselves.
stockholders are both "investors" and "owners".
hope that helps 2.0
>
> >Therefore, the trickle-down is with the WORKERS at the top, and
> >the excess trickles-down to the owners.
> >
> >Micro-economics: learn it!
>
> Bullshit: stuff it! Your understanding of economics is based on myth
> and rhetoric and bullshit. Sorry, but I gotta be honest.
>
> Note: I am not affiliated with any political party.
>
> --
> T. Max Devlin
> -- Such is my recollection of my reconstruction
> of events at the time, as I recall. Consider it.
> Research assistance gladly accepted. --
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
