On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:25:11PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Erik Mouw wrote: > > Lots of devices function on embedded stuff without even the slightest > > hint of an ISA bus. > > ISA isn't just a wiring standard. It's also lists of typical IO address to > probe for the existence of some particular hardware. That stuff is of > course part of the .c driver file. On the SA11x0 all those probes must of > course be configured out and surrounding them with #ifdef CONFIG_ISA instead > of #if !defined(CONFIG_SA1100_X) && !defined(CONFIG_FOO) && > !defined(CONFIG_BAR) seems much more tasteful to me.
Not really. It's just a matter of supplying a couple of inb()/outb() like functions, and slightly changing the probing code, and that's about it. Those kind of patches are acceptable. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ _______________________________________________ http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm Please visit the above address for information on this list.
