>> finally, because for input metering you need to be able to connect >> an "input" to an "input", there is an inherent problem with any >> system that ensures proper port polarity when connections are made. >> output metering is obviously easy to do. >Then, no, you've not read my message: to connect read flow on an input >port if perfectly fine. in my definition, an "input port" is a port that its owner will read from. for non-integrated-into-the-port-owner metering, something other the owner needs to read from the input port. this violates the very notion of what an input port is: things that want to read data from an object connect to its "output ports". i don't understand a definition that allows non-owners to read from an input port. moreover, this addresses only 1 of 4 significant problems I mentioned. --p
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Jay Ts
- Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Rick Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ... Jay Ts
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, ... Alexander Ehlert
- Re[4]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part... Rick Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Owen McCusker
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Tom Pincince
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Greg Turpin
