On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:05:15PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > Just incase anyone thinks Java is a stupid example I did a test with gcj. > It's performance on dsp-type code is withing spitting distance of c++'s. Hey, that's excellent! What about gcj's garbage collector? Is it friendly to realtime stuff? ( Hmmm... Browsing the gcj web site, it appears that it by default uses Hans Boehm's garbage collector: http://reality.sgi.com/boehm/gc.html A snip: "The collector uses a mark-sweep algorithm. It provides incremental and generational collection under operating systems which provide the right kind of virtual memory support. (Currently this includes SunOS[45], IRIX, OSF/1, Linux, Windows NT, and Windows 95, with varying restrictions.)" Incremental - good... ) Simon.
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ... Jay Ts
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, ... Alexander Ehlert
- Re[4]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part... Rick Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Owen McCusker
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Tom Pincince
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Greg Turpin
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Tom Pincince
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Rick Burnett
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ... Jay Ts
