On Thursday 5 May, 2011 13:40:25 cwillu wrote:
> Could you include the information I asked for previously?  (Kernel
> version, output of btrfs fi df and btrfs fi show)

Kernel 2.6.37-2
# btrfs fi df /home
Data, RAID0: total=2.61TB, used=2.47TB
Data: total=8.00MB, used=8.00MB
System, RAID1: total=8.00MB, used=196.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, RAID1: total=6.88GB, used=4.64GB
Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
# df /dev/sdb
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb             3907029168 2659716272 1242565920  69% /home
# df /dev/sdc
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev                   1895384       268   1895116   1% /dev
(this doesn't make any sense)
# btrfs fi show
failed to read /dev/sdg
failed to read /dev/sdf
failed to read /dev/sde
failed to read /dev/sdd
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none  uuid: 85537aa8-30dc-4f87-ac55-6c8344304184
        Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.47TB
        devid    1 size 1.82TB used 1.31TB path /dev/sdb
        devid    2 size 1.82TB used 1.31TB path /dev/sdc
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19

 
> Defrag is not the same as balancing, and neither is quite the same as
> the balancing of the internal b-trees that make up the filesystem.

I know they're not the same.  But I am asking:

I thought balancing was supposed to be automatic in BTRFS?  

Is defrag not automatic?

No idea what 'balancing of the internal b-trees' is.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to