On Thursday 5 May, 2011 13:40:25 cwillu wrote: > Could you include the information I asked for previously? (Kernel > version, output of btrfs fi df and btrfs fi show)
Kernel 2.6.37-2 # btrfs fi df /home Data, RAID0: total=2.61TB, used=2.47TB Data: total=8.00MB, used=8.00MB System, RAID1: total=8.00MB, used=196.00KB System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00 Metadata, RAID1: total=6.88GB, used=4.64GB Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00 # df /dev/sdb Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb 3907029168 2659716272 1242565920 69% /home # df /dev/sdc Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on udev 1895384 268 1895116 1% /dev (this doesn't make any sense) # btrfs fi show failed to read /dev/sdg failed to read /dev/sdf failed to read /dev/sde failed to read /dev/sdd failed to read /dev/sr0 Label: none uuid: 85537aa8-30dc-4f87-ac55-6c8344304184 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.47TB devid 1 size 1.82TB used 1.31TB path /dev/sdb devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.31TB path /dev/sdc Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 > Defrag is not the same as balancing, and neither is quite the same as > the balancing of the internal b-trees that make up the filesystem. I know they're not the same. But I am asking: I thought balancing was supposed to be automatic in BTRFS? Is defrag not automatic? No idea what 'balancing of the internal b-trees' is. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html