On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Janos Toth F. <toth.f.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com>
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:08 PM, <siranee...@tpc.co.th> wrote:
>> I think the problem is that the script does things so fast that the
>> snapshot is not always consistent on disk before btrfs send starts.
>> It's just a guess though. If I'm right, this means the rsync mismaches
>> mean the destination snapshots are bad.
> Hmm. I was wondering about this exact issue the other day when I
> fiddled with my own backup script.
> - Should I issue a sync between creating a snapshot and starting to
> rsync (or send/receive) the content of that fresh snapshot to an
> external backup storage?
A sync won't hurt, but I think we need btrfs send to include sync if
this is still required as stated by the Wiki.
And if the problem stated in the Wiki has been fixed, then it'd be
useful to know when, but a git log search doesn't reveal anything
related to NFS and Btrfs.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html