Pavel,
> So far there were not so many responses with advices on
> which fs is more suitable for CF. So please forgive me for
> reiterating the question: could everybody using CF kindly
> reply (perhaps to my address since subject hasn't draw a
> lot of interest) with one word - FS in use. Or if you in a
> talkative mood today, add CF make/model, finally you could
> make my day telling what made you choose this particular fs.
[I'm not using CF but... I feel talkative :)]
It doesn't really matter, IMHO, if you use CF. Journaling filesystems
doesn't solve all the problems with sudden powerfailure except in really
simple cases where all transactions are atomic. There's been some discussion
on this topic before: "Linux File System Corruption", "Data Reliability", oh
well, you've been around so you probably already know this.
I'd be very interested if anyone's done a comparative study on the relative
susceptibility of the different fs's with respect to this issue.
//Björnen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the command "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the message body.
For more information, see <http://waste.org/mail/linux-embedded>.
