Hi Raoul,

> why do you want to return here and not simply break and let the
> postfix_stop() continue it's work?

No, I do not have any problem even if I use the break sentence.
It is my preference to have used the return sentence.

Cheers,
Hideo Yamauchi.


--- On Mon, 2011/11/14, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] <[email protected]> wrote:

> hi!
> 
> thanks for your contribution!
> 
> On 2011-11-14 07:04, [email protected] wrote:
> > diff -r 52dcb4318e21 heartbeat/postfix
> > --- a/heartbeat/postfix    Mon Nov 14 14:46:36 2011 +0900
> > +++ b/heartbeat/postfix    Mon Nov 14 14:47:03 2011 +0900
> ...
> > @@ -168,14 +171,17 @@
> >
> >      # grant some time for shutdown and recheck 5 times
> >      for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do
> > -        if postfix_running; then
> > +        if postfix_running info; then
> >              sleep 1
> > +        else
> > +            ocf_log info "Postfix stopped."
> > +            return $OCF_SUCCESS
> >          fi
> >      done
> why do you want to return here and not simply break and let the
> postfix_stop() continue it's work?
> 
> 
> besides that, your patch looks fine upon the first check.
> 
> cheers,
> raoul
> -- 
> ____________________________________________________________________
> DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc.          email.          [email protected]
> Technischer Leiter
> 
> IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG          web.          http://www.ipax.at
> Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11           email.            [email protected]
> 1190 Wien                           tel.               +43 1 3670030
> FN 277995t HG Wien                  fax.            +43 1 3670030 15
> ____________________________________________________________________
> 
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to