hi Hideo-san!
On 2011-11-15 01:14, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi Raoul,
>
>> why do you want to return here and not simply break and let the
>> postfix_stop() continue it's work?
ok, so i would change the patch to:
> --- a/heartbeat/postfix
> +++ b/heartbeat/postfix
> @@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ postfix_stop()
> for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do
> if postfix_running info; then
> sleep 1
> + else
> + break
> fi
> done
1. simply break the loop when postfix isn't running anymore.
2. ocf_log info "Postfix stopped." will be called at the end of the
postfix_stop() method.
any objections?
thanks,
raoul
--
____________________________________________________________________
DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. [email protected]
Technischer Leiter
IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG web. http://www.ipax.at
Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. [email protected]
1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030
FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15
____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
