Hi Raoul, Thank you for comment.
> 1. simply break the loop when postfix isn't running anymore. > 2. ocf_log info "Postfix stopped." will be called at the end of the > postfix_stop() method. > > any objections? All right. I think that the correction that you suggested is right. I approve of it. Thanks, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Tue, 2011/11/15, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] <[email protected]> wrote: > hi Hideo-san! > > On 2011-11-15 01:14, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Raoul, > > > >> why do you want to return here and not simply break and let the > >> postfix_stop() continue it's work? > > ok, so i would change the patch to: > > > --- a/heartbeat/postfix > > +++ b/heartbeat/postfix > > @@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ postfix_stop() > > for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do > > if postfix_running info; then > > sleep 1 > > + else > > + break > > fi > > done > > 1. simply break the loop when postfix isn't running anymore. > 2. ocf_log info "Postfix stopped." will be called at the end of the > postfix_stop() method. > > any objections? > > thanks, > raoul > -- ____________________________________________________________________ > DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. [email protected] > Technischer Leiter > > IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG web. http://www.ipax.at > Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. [email protected] > 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030 > FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15 > ____________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
