> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Andrew Beekhof > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > > 4) Who is fiddling with sheebang paths? (Can I assume LSB > compliance?) > > sheebang?
I wrote it wrong: shebang http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix) > > 5) Where do I have to document other dependencies, e.g. certain > > interpreter? > > me no comprehendo Sorry, my English. If I write a RA in e.g. python, than python has to be installed additionally to RA itself. I don't pack the RA into the RA-package, but the packager has to know about this dependency. So, I tried to ask where to document this dependency if I'm only the RA developer but not a rpm/deb packager. That's all. :-)) Cheers Andreas Mock _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
