> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Andrew Beekhof > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 08:49 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit > > > > I wrote it wrong: shebang > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix) > > ah, Hashbang i'd have understood :-)
As always, many words for the same thing. :-) > > >>> 5) Where do I have to document other dependencies, e.g. certain > >>> interpreter? > >> > >> me no comprehendo > > > > Sorry, my English. > > If I write a RA in e.g. python, than python has to be installed > > additionally to RA itself. I don't pack the RA into the RA-package, > > but the packager has to know about this dependency. > > > > So, I tried to ask where to document this dependency if I'm only the > > RA developer but not a rpm/deb packager. That's all. :-)) > > Personally I don't think we should be automatically installing > language X just because an RA is written in that language. Yes of course. I agree. Therefore it was a question of documentation. > We include all sorts of wonderful RAs including postgres, db2 and > mysql but clearly we shouldn't be installing 3 different databases > just because we have an RA for them. obviously. :-) Have a nice day Andreas Mock _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
