On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:12 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Andrew Beekhof
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 08:49
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] 32 / 64 Bit
I wrote it wrong: shebang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix)
ah, Hashbang i'd have understood :-)
As always, many words for the same thing. :-)
5) Where do I have to document other dependencies, e.g. certain
interpreter?
me no comprehendo
Sorry, my English.
If I write a RA in e.g. python, than python has to be installed
additionally to RA itself. I don't pack the RA into the RA-package,
but the packager has to know about this dependency.
So, I tried to ask where to document this dependency if I'm only the
RA developer but not a rpm/deb packager. That's all. :-))
Personally I don't think we should be automatically installing
language X just because an RA is written in that language.
Yes of course. I agree. Therefore it was a question of documentation.
We have a script that generates man pages from the RA metadata (Dejan
is working on making it usable outside of SUSE)...
Maybe we just need to agree on some sort of "standard" attribute to
set that the script can check and use to indicate the required language.
We include all sorts of wonderful RAs including postgres, db2 and
mysql but clearly we shouldn't be installing 3 different databases
just because we have an RA for them.
obviously. :-)
Have a nice day
Andreas Mock
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
