On Feb 5, 2008, at 9:53 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Andrew Beekhof
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
4) Who is fiddling with sheebang paths? (Can I assume LSB
compliance?)
sheebang?
I wrote it wrong: shebang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix)
ah, Hashbang i'd have understood :-)
5) Where do I have to document other dependencies, e.g. certain
interpreter?
me no comprehendo
Sorry, my English.
If I write a RA in e.g. python, than python has to be installed
additionally to RA itself. I don't pack the RA into the RA-package,
but the packager has to know about this dependency.
So, I tried to ask where to document this dependency if I'm only the
RA developer but not a rpm/deb packager. That's all. :-))
Personally I don't think we should be automatically installing
language X just because an RA is written in that language.
We include all sorts of wonderful RAs including postgres, db2 and
mysql but clearly we shouldn't be installing 3 different databases
just because we have an RA for them.
IMHO, languages for non-core RAs (ie. not FileSystem, IPaddr,...)
should be handled the same way.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
