On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >
>  >  > Then my other questions is:  Who supports current Heartbeat packages
>  >  > suitable for Pacemaker and where I can get sources for them with
>  >  > appropriate .spec files?
>  >
>  >  Source rpms are available at the link below:
>  >
>  >    http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/
>
>  Got source RPM for Fedora 6.0 and used heartbeat.spec file for there
>  to build packages for CentOS 4.0.
>  With some tweaks I was able to build RPMs but not all that I wanted.
>  I've got these:
>
>  -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1240053 Mar 19 09:20 stonith-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
>  -rw-r--r--  1 root root  203643 Mar 19 09:20
>  heartbeat-ldirectord-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
>  -rw-r--r--  1 root root  262921 Mar 19 09:20 heartbeat-devel-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
>  -rw-r--r--  1 root root 6229896 Mar 19 09:20 heartbeat-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
>  -rw-r--r--  1 root root  296815 Mar 19 09:21 pils-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
>
>  I also wanted heartbeat-common, heartbeat-resources

They come from the spec-file in the source rpm (look in the
/usr/src/packages/SPECS directory or whatever RH uses).
Alan's spec file doesn't follow the same structure.

[snip]

>  >  Just to re-iterate though, the opensuse.org packages are built from
>  >  the "official" linux-ha.org sources that Alan has tested and tagged.
>  >  There is no reason why these packages should be any less reliable than
>  >  any others built from the same sources.
>
>  Per my experience management often prefers packages that come with a
>  distro. So a package fro RHEL from RedHat will be preferred over a
>  package from linux-ha.org or Suse.

Understandable on some levels^, but RH doesn't build Heartbeat for RHEL does it?

^ I've had various things to say about this in the past though :-)

[snip]

>  >  I've been trying to get CentOS4/RHEL4 added to the list, however so
>  >  far we've not been able to get 10 potential users to demonstrate
>  >  enough demand for them to be added.
>
>  I can't believe that everybody moved to RHEL 5.0. I believe that
>  people just install packages that come with RHEL 4.0, and use them
>  till they discover any hard problem.

Well whatever they're doing, they're not asking us for RHEL4 packages :-)
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to