On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Serge Dubrouski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then my other questions is: Who supports current Heartbeat
packages
suitable for Pacemaker and where I can get sources for them with
appropriate .spec files?
Source rpms are available at the link below:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/
Got source RPM for Fedora 6.0 and used heartbeat.spec file for there
to build packages for CentOS 4.0.
With some tweaks I was able to build RPMs but not all that I wanted.
I've got these:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1240053 Mar 19 09:20
stonith-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 203643 Mar 19 09:20
heartbeat-ldirectord-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 262921 Mar 19 09:20 heartbeat-
devel-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6229896 Mar 19 09:20
heartbeat-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296815 Mar 19 09:21 pils-2.1.3-1.i386.rpm
I also wanted heartbeat-common, heartbeat-resources
They come from the spec-file in the source rpm (look in the
/usr/src/packages/SPECS directory or whatever RH uses).
Alan's spec file doesn't follow the same structure.
That's much better! I was able to build CentOS 4.0 packages without
any real problem. For those who is interested procedures are really
simple:
1. Get src packages (heartbeat, pcaemaker-heartbeat( for Fedora distro
and install them on CentOS.
2. Go to /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and run:
rpmbuild -bb heartbeat.spec for building heartbeat packages
rpmbuild -bb pacmaker.spec for building pacemaker-heartbeat package
For Andrew: make rpm is broken in source package. I can give more
details if you need them.
Even the concept of "make rpm" (particularly in an autoconf/automake
based project) is broken :-)
The spec file is intended to be a recipe for taking a source tarball
and producing binary packages.
Requiring the project to be built (to obtain a spec file) in order to
build the project is a fundamentally flawed idea and results in
needless duplication.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
