Hi Nick,

I spent e few weeks to try to make this stack ocfs2.pcmk working with 
pacemaker/corosync stack
last fall 2010, and this stack was definitely not working on RH. Many 
conflicts
between ocfs2 clustering and pacemaker clustering leading to both nodes 
killed
or at least ocfs2 fs read-only whereas the other node was fenced, etc. I 
give up
on this stack. 
I 'm very curious to know if it works now (at least on RHEL6) but I don't 
think so 
as the response of Oracle last year was that they did not work on this 
stack again.
But perhaps they have now ...

Let us know.
Thanks a lot
Alain Moullé



De :    Nick Khamis <[email protected]>
A :     General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]>
Date :  25/10/2011 20:14
Objet : [Linux-HA] PCMK + OCFS2
Envoyé par :    [email protected]



Hello Everyone,

Moving forward, I noticed that there was not much documentation
regarding getting the pcmk stack working
with ocfs2. I have the configuration up and running however, missed
the part regarding getting what is required
for pcmk+ocfs support (to get ocf:pacemaker:controld +
ocf:pacemaker:o2cb working).

Everything is build from source using the latest version of Glue, RA,
PCMK, and OpenAIS. OCFS2 works fine
manually, and now I am trying to get corosync to handle it. This is on
a prototype environment right now using
Debian Squeeze however, will be using an EL like Red Hat for
production. No stonith is required just yet, but if
the documentation includes that as well it would be beneficial very soon.

I did find: 
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20091013/b7980710/attachment.bat

from
2009 but reckon a lot has changed since then?

Thanks in Advance as Always,

Nick from Toronto.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to