And last thing I forgot to write : as far as I remind, the problem with controld.pcml/ocfs2.pmck and Pacemaker was not on the pacemaker side but in the controld.pcml/ocfs2.pmck stack . Alain
De : Nick Khamis <[email protected]> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> Date : 26/10/2011 14:49 Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] PCMK + OCFS2 Envoyé par : [email protected] Hello Alain, >>last fall 2010, and this stack was definitely not working on RH. Many >>conflicts If you were using RH 5, the kernel was too old, and therefore had problems with the ocfs2.pcmk stack. In RH6 I have read this is working. I will keep everyone updated I'm compiling everything from source (vanilla kernel, pcmk stack, ocfs2, dlm and fence from cman). I have been lucky so far, and now I will attempt at pcmk.ocfs2. The reason I am building everything from scratch, is for the nose bleed for one ;), and to be more portable. With the inclusion of some distro dependencies, I can easily move from Debian to Gentoo, to SLES RH etc... Or can I? One this is for sure, the difficulties I am going through now, will only get easier with every migration. The configs will always come with me. If I do hit a wall with ocfs2.pcmk, are the alternatives a better option that will allow me to complete this endevour? Is GFS2 or Lusture better supported, and or more stable? Maybe I should create a Wiki for ocfs2.pcmk from source on Debian, Gentoo, RH, SLES etc... Thanks in Advance, Nick from Toronto. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
