On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:19 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> And last thing I forgot to write :
> as far as I remind, the problem with controld.pcml/ocfs2.pmck and
> Pacemaker was not on the pacemaker side
> but in the controld.pcml/ocfs2.pmck stack .

You shouldn't need the .pcmk controld variants.
Far better at this stage to use the "normal" cman ones and have
pacemaker use that for membership/quorum too.

> Alain
>
>
>
> De :    Nick Khamis <[email protected]>
> A :     General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]>
> Date :  26/10/2011 14:49
> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] PCMK + OCFS2
> Envoyé par :    [email protected]
>
>
>
> Hello Alain,
>
>>>last fall 2010, and this stack was definitely not working on RH. Many
>>>conflicts
>
> If you were using RH 5, the kernel was too old, and therefore had problems
> with
> the ocfs2.pcmk stack. In RH6 I have read this is working. I will keep
> everyone
> updated
>
> I'm compiling everything from source (vanilla kernel, pcmk stack, ocfs2,
> dlm
> and fence from cman). I have been lucky so far, and now I will attempt
> at pcmk.ocfs2.
> The reason I am building everything from scratch, is for the nose
> bleed for one ;),
> and to be more portable. With the inclusion of some distro dependencies, I
> can
> easily move from Debian to Gentoo, to SLES RH etc... Or can I? One
> this is for sure,
> the difficulties I am going through now, will only get easier with
> every migration. The
> configs will always come with me.
>
> If I do hit a wall with ocfs2.pcmk, are the alternatives a better
> option that will allow
> me to complete this endevour? Is GFS2 or Lusture better supported, and
> or more stable?
>
> Maybe I should create a Wiki for ocfs2.pcmk from source on Debian,
> Gentoo, RH, SLES etc...
>
> Thanks in Advance,
>
> Nick from Toronto.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to