Hello Gents, Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the plans once the next release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From what I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely.
Thanks in Advance, Nick. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov <[email protected]> wrote: > 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >> with it. I am trying to setup an >> active/active using: >> >> Corosync 1.4.2 >> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >> Cluster3 >> DRBD 8.3.7 >> OCFS2 >> >> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >> would be handled by stonithd. >> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >> managers. Defining nodes in >> both cman and corosync/openais? > > You may look at > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09959.html > > That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing > path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, > and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done > to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. > > That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and > run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. > > Best, > Vladislav > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
