On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Tim Serong <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 04:11 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 02.11.2011 16:36, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>> Vladislav,
>>>
>>> Thank you so much for your response. Just to make sure, all I need is to:
>>> * Apply the three patches to cman. Found here
>>> "http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/75164?do=post_view_threaded";.
>>> * Recompile CMAN
>>> * Do I have to recompile PCMK again?
>>>
>>> I also want to mention that fencing is not important right now, and I
>>> would like to disable fencing JUST for the prototype,
>>> and untill things are going. I am almost there (cman-pcmk+ocfs2) with
>>
>> That patches are for fencing only.
>> I have no idea about what goes wrong with your ocfs2_controld, I gave up
>> on trying ocfs2 because it hangs the whole cluster for me.
>
> That reminds me...  Nick, if you disable fencing (even for your
> prototype), and you experience (or try to test) any kind of split brain,
> or you kill one node (ungracefully), the clustered filesystem on all the
> other (surviving) nodes will freeze/lock up, because the cluster is
> unable to fence the failed node.  Even if you choose something like
> meatware (see http://clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_fencing.html), you should
> still configure *some* means of fencing for any prototype system that's
> going to need fencing when put into production :)

The current git code (and 1.1.7 when it comes out) no longer require a
device to be configured.
Simply run: stonith_admin --confirm $node
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to