That would be really great. Is there any talk of when the next stable release of: * pcmk+corosync supporting direct communication with dlm gfs, controld * The separation of dlm, gfs, controld from cman
will be availabile? Thanks in Advance, Nick. On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Nick Khamis <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello Gents, >> >> Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the >> plans once the next >> release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From >> what >> I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely. > > When CMAN goes away, the dlm gfs controld's will be talking directly > to corosync. > I believe the work has already been done but may need additional testing. > >> >> Thanks in Advance, >> >> Nick. >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>> >>>> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >>>> with it. I am trying to setup an >>>> active/active using: >>>> >>>> Corosync 1.4.2 >>>> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >>>> Cluster3 >>>> DRBD 8.3.7 >>>> OCFS2 >>>> >>>> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >>>> would be handled by stonithd. >>>> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >>>> managers. Defining nodes in >>>> both cman and corosync/openais? >>> >>> You may look at >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09959.html >>> >>> That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing >>> path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, >>> and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done >>> to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. >>> >>> That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and >>> run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. >>> >>> Best, >>> Vladislav >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
