I am actually buiding everything from source (glue, RA, pcmk, corosync/openais, dlm and friends), hoping that way I do not have to wait for the release of fedora 17 (May 2012). I actually need this as soon as possible.
Nick On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Nick Khamis <[email protected]> wrote: >> That would be really great. Is there any talk of when the next stable >> release of: >> * pcmk+corosync supporting direct communication with dlm gfs, controld >> * The separation of dlm, gfs, controld from cman >> >> will be availabile? > > Maybe fedora 17 > >> >> Thanks in Advance, >> >> Nick. >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Nick Khamis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello Gents, >>>> >>>> Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the >>>> plans once the next >>>> release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From >>>> what >>>> I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely. >>> >>> When CMAN goes away, the dlm gfs controld's will be talking directly >>> to corosync. >>> I believe the work has already been done but may need additional testing. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in Advance, >>>> >>>> Nick. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >>>>>> with it. I am trying to setup an >>>>>> active/active using: >>>>>> >>>>>> Corosync 1.4.2 >>>>>> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >>>>>> Cluster3 >>>>>> DRBD 8.3.7 >>>>>> OCFS2 >>>>>> >>>>>> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >>>>>> would be handled by stonithd. >>>>>> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >>>>>> managers. Defining nodes in >>>>>> both cman and corosync/openais? >>>>> >>>>> You may look at >>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09959.html >>>>> >>>>> That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing >>>>> path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, >>>>> and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done >>>>> to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. >>>>> >>>>> That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and >>>>> run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Vladislav >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
