Hi, On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:11:16PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.06.2013 08:43, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > [...] > >>>>> I recall that LDAP has similar problem, which is easily worked around > >>>>> with specifying two values, one is original, second is new. > >>>>> That way you tell LDAP server: > >>>>> Replace value Y in attribute X to value Z. And if value is not Y at the > >>>>> moment of modification request, then command fails. > >>>> > >>>> "cibadmin --patch" works this way > >>> > >>> Who is baking new CIB in that case, cibadmin or cib? > >> > >> The patch is applied on the server - so "cib" > > > > Then that is safe way to go, assuming that cib daemon serializes > > modification requests. > > > > It would be great if crmsh use that trick.
Hope to have something soon. Stay tuned. Thanks, Dejan _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
