Mark
The ARRL discussed this in one of their weekly bulletins stating that it was
legal. I am sure you can find the explaination on the ARRL Web page with a
little looking.
Ron N5IN
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Schoonover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'tpm' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 'Jonathan NAYLOR'
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 'linux-hams' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: A dose of reality
>Is it legal for US hams to run PSK31?? I'm not sure about that, and do
>highly agree that proprietary protocols have no business being in
>amateur radio. I didn't run FlexNet for that main reason, as I'm not
>planning on using M$DOS with my packet work. Running Slackware on a
>laptop is preferable to me!
>
>.mark
>
>=================================================
> Mark Schoonover KA6WKE IS Manager
> Trail Runner,HAM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ka6wke@wb6dgr.#sca.ca.usa.noam
> http://www.qsl.net/ka6wke ka6wke-1 145.05
> Mobile: 146.52 & 28.470
> Long: 32.85380 Lat: -117.00980 Grid: DM12LU
>=================================================
>
>
>
>
>>----------
>>From: Jonathan NAYLOR[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 6:02 AM
>>To: tpm
>>Cc: linux-hams
>>Subject: Re: A dose of reality
>>
>>Tomi Manninen was quoted by hand in Lotus Notes saying:
>>>
>>> Agreed. Amateur radio is supposed to be about experimentation. I don't
see
>>> much space for experimentation with proprietary protocols. Proprietary
>>> protocols have no place in amateur radio! (I feel better now... :)
>>>
>>
>>You mean like FlexNet ? (just to name a random example).
>>
>>
>>Sound of asbestos underwear being put on.
>>
>>
>>Jonathan HB9/G4KLX
>>
>
