Steve Dimse K4HG wrote:

>
> The 144.39 allocation is for North America only. There is no need for
> areas outside propagation range to be on the same frequency. Australia
> should set their own policy based on their own needs.

Being 144.39 is VHF, and as such its typical propagation range is limited to
RF line of sight (which encompasses an area far less then the North
American Continent) , are you now suggesting that the TAPR nationwide
APRS 144.39 "RF single frequency plan" is technically unsound?

As a side note, (not directed at you Steve), I think those that want to
slam the $$$ element of APRS as a impident to progress should direct
their efforts at fixing it instead of giving political reasons why it can't be
fixed.

-Jeff

Reply via email to