---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: APRS for Linux?
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 21:36:08 -0800
From: James S. Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, you wrote:
>Maybe the W7 users refused to report on their activities due to the
>confrontational style of communication of the individual making the
>request. Perhaps all those expletives made them do a 75-meter thing
>(No, not hold they key down: Turn the dial to another frequency).
Non-confrontation is for conformists. What explitives are you referring to?
For your information, they believed that the ARRL was not doing anyting for
them and that APRS didn't fall into the same categories as repeaters, packet,
weak-signal or any other mode that was to be analyzed for future reference.
>In fact, if there were a UDP assigned number and protocol for AVL
>multicasts I could use that today as an alternative method to glue "ugly"
>APRS RF nets together. After all, the ugly protocol is now permanent: It's
>in a real radio manufacturer's hardware. And I bought one.
There is. It's called time. If that doesn't do it for you, then why not put
together an RFC and just do it?
-------------------------------
James S. Kaplan KG7FU
Eugene Oregon USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rio.com/~kg7fu
Have YOU tried Linux today?
NAR# 74764
--------------------------------
--
-------------------------------
James S. Kaplan KG7FU
Eugene Oregon USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rio.com/~kg7fu
Have YOU tried Linux today?
NAR# 74764
--------------------------------
