On 03-Aug-99 Walter Koch wrote: >>The requirement to comply with the regulations is >>that the FULL BASE CALLSIGN be inserted in the address field. > Sorry, this is a) off topic and b) national. Riley, please would quote the paragraph in BR68 and/or WT acts which demonstrate the assertion you have made above. A number of people have already pointed out where this assertion falls down in current protocols, custom and practise, I shan't add to it. Dirk G1TLH --- Dirk-Jan Koopman, Tobit Computer Co Ltd At the source of every error which is blamed on the computer you will find at least two human errors, including the error of blaming it on the computer.
- Re: CEPT callsigns Riley Williams
- Re: CEPT callsigns Michele A Debandi
- Re: CEPT callsigns Tim Salo
- Re: CEPT callsigns Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
- Re: CEPT callsigns Riley Williams
- Re: CEPT callsigns Ignacio Arenaza
- Re: CEPT callsigns (off t... Nate Bargmann
- Re: CEPT callsigns (off t... Bob Nielsen
- Re: CEPT callsigns Julian Munoz Dominguez
- Re: CEPT callsigns Walter Koch
- Re: CEPT callsigns Dirk Koopman
- Re: CEPT callsigns Robin Gilks
- Re: CEPT callsigns Thomas KE6CBR
- Re: CEPT callsigns Riley Williams
- Re: CEPT callsigns Dirk Koopman
- Re: CEPT callsigns Riley Williams
- Re: CEPT callsigns Riley Williams
- Re: CEPT callsigns Geoff Blake
- Re: CEPT callsigns Riley Williams
- Re: CEPT callsigns The Big Penguin
- Re: Cept callsigns Bob Nielsen
