Linux-Hardware Digest #52, Volume #9 Tue, 29 Dec 98 11:15:22 EST
Contents:
Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem (Chris Lee)
What is a good ISDN card for Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux won't see full available RAM (32M) (Thierry Chenus)
Re: Plse Help: Creative PCI128 ???Will not work??? (Erwin de Beus)
Re: [Q] Diamond Viper 550 (Rick Moen)
Gettyin uugetty to work to allow dialin (Gary Lebowitz)
Re: RHL5.2 Install problem-CD not found (Jasper Janssen)
Leadtec does not support linux (Frank Tiels)
Re: Do I have a winmodem? (Henry Wong)
Re: how does the new XEON intel processor compare to the pII ? (Jasper Janssen)
Can linux handle UDMA/33? (Lyndon F. Bartels)
Re: SCSI Tape Drive reading "other" UNIX ("Khalid M. Baheyeldin")
Re: Gettyin uugetty to work to allow dialin (Nico Kadel-Garcia)
Re: printing with HP 870cSE (Geoff Allsup)
Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem (Nico Kadel-Garcia)
RC.INET???????? (Vincent)
Dat Autoloader question (John Yang)
Re: Just when you thought it was just Winmodems (Thomas Schuering)
Re: winmodems (Rob Clark)
Re: Moodems that will transmit at 56k? (Bernd Harries)
Re: linux network problem, linksys ethernet cards (josh greenberg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Lee)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem
Date: 29 Dec 1998 11:07:41 GMT
In article <769tli$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>I avoid the problem by refusing all internal modems and only getting
>externals. If there's no physical connection to the motherboard other
>than through a standard rs232 port, then I'm guaranteed that there's no
>way in hell it can offload some of its responsibility to the CPU no matter
>what it says on the box in the store. Granted it costs about $10-15 more
>than an equivilent internal modem, but then you get Dasblinkelights on the
>modem. You can never have too many blinkenlights.
And the blinkenlights can help you find out why your modem isn't working.
Notice that nearly all the people who claim to have problems with their
modems are using internal modems with no blinkenlights....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What is a good ISDN card for Linux
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 11:27:50 GMT
Hello all,
In a few weeks, I will get an ISDN line. What is a good ISDN card for Linux?
Thanks in advance!
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Thierry Chenus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux won't see full available RAM (32M)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 11:46:49 +0100
Peter K. Achs wrote:
>
> I have a Compaq 486/66M with Pentium Overdrive and 32M of RAM. The 24
> Meg of the memory resides on an expansion card. Linux reports only 16 M
> of it. Already tried the mem=32m at LILO prompt. All I get is a kernel
> panic. What else should I look for?
I use to have the same problem on my computer ( COMPAQ Deskpro Pentium
75 with 40 Mo RAM ). I flashed my BIOS with a newer release to fix a
memory hole bug concerning COMPAQ PCs, and the problem went away !
--
===============================================
| Thierry Chenus - Linux Slackware Powered :) |
===============================================
------------------------------
From: Erwin de Beus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plse Help: Creative PCI128 ???Will not work???
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 12:36:57 +0100
I got a PCI 128 card yesterday. If I get it to work I will let you know.
Good luck,
Erwin de Beus
------------------------------
From: Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: [Q] Diamond Viper 550
Date: 29 Dec 1998 09:24:20 GMT
[Distribution snipped for followups.]
In comp.os.linux.setup Draco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: You have probably seen a post like this 500 times. I am having
: trouble with the Diamond Viper 550 and X-Windows. I found the Riva 128
: driver for it, installed it, and I don't know what to do after that. I
: have heard that Xf86 3.3.3 supports the card, but I cannot put one of
: the files on a 1.44mg floppy. I have tried virtually every card in
: Xconfigurator, and nothing works. Could someone please help???
OK, as you no doubt know, "Diamond Viper" tells us very little of
consequence (in itself), while "Riva 128" helps a lot. (Thanks!)
I mention that for the benefit of others reading this thread.
What you have there, per www.diamondmm.com, is an NVIDIA RIVA TNT
2D/3D chipset with 16 MB SDRAM, on either PCI or AGP. Armed with
that knowledge, we go next to http://www.xfree86.org/, where we
read that "Riva TNT" support is new with the latest version (3.3.3).
I'm assuming that you have an Intel-type PC (instead of, say, a
DEC Alpha). You didn't state what distribution you have, so I
don't know whether your system supports glibc2 aka libc6, or only
libc5.
So, lacking that information (which _you_ have), we check both
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/3.3.3/binaries/Linux-ix86-glibc/Servers/
and
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/3.3.3/binaries/Linux-ix86-libc5/Servers/
Driver notes for NVIDIA are at
http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.3/NVIDIA1.html#1
One infers from the release notes that the correct X server for NVIDIA,
for now, is the "SVGA" (VESA mode) one, XF86_SVGA.
The "XSVGA.tgz" compressed archive is 1280 KB in the "glibc" ftp directory,
and 1323 KB in the libc5 directory. So, you're _wrong_: It'll fit just
fine on a DOS floppy. Use that and the "mcopy" command to acquire the
correct files on your Linux box.
Unpack the binary ("tar xvzf XSVGA.tgz", or like that), and put it
in /usr/X11R6/bin/ with permissions 755 ("chmod 755 /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_SVGA).
Re-set the /etc/X11/X symbolic link to point to it, e.g.,
cd /etc/X11
ln -s ../../usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_SVGA X
Now have another go at that Xconfigurator thing that Red Hat provides,
or XF86Setup, or xf86config. Using one of the three, specify the "SVGA"
server (among other things).
Have fun. ;->
--
Cheers, The cynics among us might say: "We laugh,
Rick Moen monkeyboys -- Linux IS the mainstream UNIX now!
rick (at) linuxmafia.com MuaHaHaHa!" but that would be rude. -- Jim Dennis
------------------------------
From: Gary Lebowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Gettyin uugetty to work to allow dialin
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 09:32:23 +0100
Help anyone. I have Bullet 33.6 modem and am having devil of a time
trying to get my machine to accept dialins. Read Modem HOTO and followed
instructions to a T. Modem answers but get no CONNECT XXX and cannot
login remotely. Tried all sorts of AT tweaking and nothing helps. Can
somone put me out of my misery?
Regards,
Gary Lebowitz
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jasper Janssen)
Subject: Re: RHL5.2 Install problem-CD not found
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 12:00:54 GMT
On Mon, 28 Dec 1998 10:58:24 -0700, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am a REAL newbie and am interested in setting up my old computer with Linux.
>It is a Compaq Presario 433 (specs:
>http://www.compaq.com/athome/showroom/classics/433_qs.html). It is very
>similar to the box that you describe below, although I am still looking for
>another/a larger hard drive than the 200MB stock drive. I think that the
>drive is an IDE drive. Maybe your experiences since the post below will have
>given you some wisdom. THE BIG QUESTION: Is it worth it to put Linux on
>computers like these?
I run a masquerading gateway on a 386dx/40. Also email server for me
:)
Note that this is to a network with on average 1 user maximum two at a
time. But still, it works.
CPU is 90% idle... I do have it upgraded to 12 meg ram, and the 100
meg drive is very barely enough. Of course, once I'm satisfied it's
working, I can remove the kernel source and save some space :)
As far as things like actual user apps are concerned, tho, I don't
have much experience. Especially X might be quite heavy on a 486 base
comp.
Anyway, if you upgrade anything first memory then hard disk. Those are
usually the most important :)
Jasper
------------------------------
From: Frank Tiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Leadtec does not support linux
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 10:01:48 +0100
This is a letter I received from leadtek's support... nice...
Doesn't anyone has a winfast s320 that is used under linux?? I tried the
instructions on www.xfree86,org/3.3.3/NVIDIA2.html , but it only makes
my x-windows work in 320x200 if I select a higher resolution I get the
famous error 111.
Thanks
It's a pity.
We don't support Linux driver.
Please go to ask the Linux group from BBS.
Best regards,
Technical Marketing Department, Leadtek Research Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.leadtek.com.tw
ftp://ftp.leadtek.com.tw
Mirror Site: ftp://ftp.cis.nctu.edu.tw/Vendors/LeadTek/
ftp://ftp.tku.edu.tw/Vendors/LeadTek/
ftp://nctuccca.edu.tw/vendors/Leadtek/
ftp://ftp.hinet.net/vendors/Leadtek/
Certified under ISO-9001. We make Dreams a Reality !!! v
.
>
>My Name = Frank Tiels
>Product Name = other
>Purchased From = B.I.P. Ghent
>My Company Name = DIGITAL
>Email = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Phone Number = 09/3290374
>System Environment = Motherboard: ASUS
>CPU(brand, type & frequency): INTEL PII400
>Operating System: Linux
>Motherboard Chipset:
>Motherboard BIOS version:
>Graphics card BIOS version (if applied):
>Graphics card driver version (if applied):
>IRQ Usage:
>Peripheral cards:
>
>
>
>Symptoms =
>I don't find any driver for my linux (slackware)
>to run the x-window environement.
>Can you provide me a driver, or point me to someone who can
>and/or an other setting I can use in order to use my
>magnificant card under the best OS
>
>Thank allready for the support,
------------------------------
From: Henry Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Do I have a winmodem?
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 05:06:01 -0500
Jeff,
I assume that the modem is integral with the laptop and not a
PCMCIA card (which would have a name and number). There should
be a FCC ID for the modem somewhere on the laptop or in your
documentation. With this information, refer to
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
which lists many modems cross referenced by this number and
gives you a clue if it is a "winmodem" or one of its relations.
Henry
Jeff Kenney wrote:
>
> What is the definitive test to determine if I have a winmodem?
> I have a internal modem in a fairly new laptop that I have been
> unable to get working under Linux (It works fine under Win95).
> There is no manufacturer listed either in Windows device manager
> or anywhere in the 109 page manual that came with the modem.
> I can find nothing in the manual that would lead me to believe
> it is a winmodem, but I am kind of a newbie to this stuff so I
> could be wrong. I've tried minicom, netconf, and several other
> programs with no luck whatsoever (i.e. not even a dial tone).
> echo ATDT > COM2 in both DOS and Win95 gives me a dial tone,
> but echo ATDT > /dev/cau1 under Red Hat 5.2 does nothing.
> pnpdump shows absolutely nothing of intrest. My bios has a
> setting for "COMB MODE". When I change the setting from MODEM
> to FIR the modem no longer works under DOS or Windows. Should
> I keep trying to get this to work or is it hopeless (a winmodem)?
> ...........................................................
> : :
> : "I still think my state of mind is delicate. :
> : Sometimes it's all right, but I feel kind of... :
> : I think I've got guests, you know. .
> : I think I've got jokers."
> :
> : Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Kenney)
> . WWW : http://www.primenet.com/~jkenney/index.htm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jasper Janssen)
Subject: Re: how does the new XEON intel processor compare to the pII ?
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 11:53:31 GMT
On Mon, 28 Dec 1998 20:22:54 GMT, "Andrew kunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>not true...
>
> the xeon's have a 46% performance increase over p-pro's and i'm not =
>sure of the numbers but it can be stated as quite comfortable over the =
>pentium II processors.. i at one point thought there was nothing faster =
>then a pentium II @ 450 mhz..
Well, according to tomshardware, for normal apps, they might be 1-2%
faster. It's the very same descartes core, on the Xeon, as on the
P-II.If you're going for servers, especially app servers, of course,
_then_ the Xeon shines... mainly by virtue of the full-speed cache,
which starts to help a little, and if you have the appropriate
version, the larger cache, too. And of course the extensive
multi-processing features. That's all just in the PCB, tho. the actual
core is trhe same.
Jasper
<snip some irritating HTML>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lyndon F. Bartels)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Can linux handle UDMA/33?
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 98 12:17:55 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm building a mid-level server. It's job will be web serving. I need some
disks, but I don't know if I should go SCSI or stay with IDE. The biggest
reason behind this is, of course, cost.
I was looking at the various disk drives, and motherboards. One of the newest
technologies is the UDMA/33 standard. This offers a 33 M/sec transfer rate.
For my purposes, this may be good enough. If you think about it, modem
connections to the internet are 115,200 bps. Tops. So the slowest link would
be the modem connection.
Anyway, my question is, if I were to build a computer with UDMA/33 compliant
disk drives and motherboards, would linux be able to "handle" it? Or does it
even matter?
Thanks in advance,
Lyndon F. Bartels
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 15:17:44 +0300
From: "Khalid M. Baheyeldin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SCSI Tape Drive reading "other" UNIX
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
I am not sure if this will solve your problem or not,
but I have used the same technique for proting data from
Motorola 680x0 based UNIX systems and MIPS RISC based
systems to Intel UNIX systems, so it may work for you:
Insert the tape and use the following command:
dd if=/dev/your-tape conv=swab | tar tvf -
If you see a list of files, then do it again
using "tar xvf".
Regards
Farrar wrote:
>
> I have a 4mm DAT SCSI tape drive that works fine when reading and writing
> natively under Linux. My problem is that I have a tar tape that was created
> on a SUN/Sparc.
>
> I was able to use dd to pull some data off (looked at data and found source
> file fragments imbedded.) It does look like a tar file (somewhat), the
> header looks bogus and Linux complains that its not in tar format.
>
> I am hoping that the problem I am having can be rectified by changing the
> blocking factor (or something easy like that.) Any help would be greatly
> appreciated.
--
Khalid M. Baheyeldin
Senior IT Consultant
Remove all the X characters in my e-mail address to reply
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nico Kadel-Garcia)
Subject: Re: Gettyin uugetty to work to allow dialin
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:41:16 GMT
On Tue, 29 Dec 1998 09:32:23 +0100, Gary Lebowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Help anyone. I have Bullet 33.6 modem and am having devil of a time
>trying to get my machine to accept dialins. Read Modem HOTO and followed
>instructions to a T. Modem answers but get no CONNECT XXX and cannot
>login remotely. Tried all sorts of AT tweaking and nothing helps. Can
>somone put me out of my misery?
Pitch uugetty now. Proceed directly to HylaFAX, at www.hylafax.org, and
included with some Linux distributions.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoff Allsup)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: printing with HP 870cSE
Date: 29 Dec 1998 14:00:37 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Dec 1998 22:39:29 -0600, Todd Ostermeier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Dec 1998, Bill Pitz wrote:
>
>: I am successfully running the 5xx/6xx driver printing to a Deskjet 890Cse. It
>: prints graphics, etc. from netscape with no problem at all. (in color or
>: grayscale)
>
>The difference here is that the 890Cse is an actual printer, whereas the
>870xxx is just an ink head/cartridge and paper feeder, with the "guts"
>being implemented in the windows driver (aka a winprinter). there is,
>
WRONG! Get your facts straight - the 850, 855, 870 and 890 are all "real"
printers that work just fine with Linux - I use them all with no problem!
I believe the 820 is the only Windoze-only PPA printer in the 8xx series.
geoff
******************************************************************
Geoff Allsup Upper Ocean Processes Group
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA, USA
******************************************************************
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nico Kadel-Garcia)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:43:52 GMT
On 29 Dec 1998 00:42:57 -0600, Steve Mading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>mlw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>I avoid the problem by refusing all internal modems and only getting
>externals. If there's no physical connection to the motherboard other
>than through a standard rs232 port, then I'm guaranteed that there's no
>way in hell it can offload some of its responsibility to the CPU no matter
>what it says on the box in the store. Granted it costs about $10-15 more
>than an equivilent internal modem, but then you get Dasblinkelights on the
>modem. You can never have too many blinkenlights.
No. Forcing users to have another power plug on their desk and more
cables to cope with sucks pretty severely, even if Dasblinkelights
are extremely useful for troubleshooting.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 05:44:28 -0800
From: Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux
Subject: RC.INET????????
I need to modify a file called rc.inet1, rc.inet2, and resolv.conf, but
these files are not in RedHat. Where are these files in RedHat? What
do these files do? How do I configure these files for an Intranet?
Thanks,
Vincent
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Yang)
Subject: Dat Autoloader question
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:33:01 -0800
I'm thinking about buying an autoloader to do nightly
backups for a colocation machine. The OS is Linux,
and the average bacckup size is around 4 Gigs. I've
currently got a DDS-2 drive there. and tape changes
are done weekly (in theory). Has anyone had good or
bad experiences with any particular model which I
should look at or avoid? And also what is a good
package to manage an autoloader on Linux? And does
anyone know the commands to change tapes? for example
if I've got tape 3 in the drive, how would I change to
tape 5?
TIA for any advice on HW models and SW packages.
*** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ***
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Schuering)
Subject: Re: Just when you thought it was just Winmodems
Date: 29 Dec 1998 05:10:00 +0100
X-No-Archive: yes
Hi,
you've posted a big binary-file into a NON-binary-newsgroup. You should
pay some more attention to the rules of netiqette. Such postings belong to
binary-groups. NON-binary groups are intended only for discussion-postings
or FAQs. Please keep in mind that there are many people who have to
download the whole newsgroup to be able to read it. I don't think you make
them happy with such postings.
Maybe not the best english, but you should have got the point.
Regards,
Thomas
*** PGP-Key per Empfangsbestaetigung ***
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
alt.unix,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,at.linux,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: winmodems
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Clark)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 15:12:57 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Fox <d s f o x @ c o g s c i . u c s d . e d u> wrote:
>The Multitech MultiModemZPX-PCI (Model number MT5634ZPX-PCI) *appears*
>to be a PCI bus "realmodem" (tm). Someone should try it in a Linux
>box. I see it at www.mcglen.com for $145.84.
Yes, that's what this press release seems to say (about halfway down the
page):
http://www.multitech.com/releases/release.asp?Index=85
The rest of their on-line documentation is very poor, compared to other
manufacturers, IMHO.
For $145.84, I'm not going to be the one to try it :)
Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
------------------------------
From: Bernd Harries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Moodems that will transmit at 56k?
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 02:52:35 +0100
Hi Erikc,
erikc wrote:
> >|enough for that. And I have Euro ISDN. So 98% of my 64000 bit/s TX
> >|channel are unused. :-(
> >|Want to rent it for DM 2,- per month? ;-))
>
> What is your actual billing (ISDN, time on line, etc) on a monthly
> basis. Here in the US, you have to pay an arm and a leg (something
> like US$60/month) for the service, it isn't that great, and it is not
> available in some areas.
The basic price of an ISDN line is DM 40,- + 16 % TAX =~ DM 46,xx each
month in Germany (Telekom) . That gives me 2 B-channels a 64000 bit/s +
1 D-channel a 16000 bit/s for signalling purposes. = 144000 bit/s
bidirectional. Plus I have 10 phone numbers (MSNs)
Into the house comes the 2 wire line.
If that line is analog, it costs about DM 24,- each month, little more
than half of ISDN.
Each connection costs money depending on the daytime. City calls cost
DM 0.1201 - for 4 minutes after 21:00,
- for 2'30 minutes after 18:00
- for 1'30 minutes 09:00 .. 18:00
This is the expansive thing, but it depends heavyly on the actual use.
This area seems to be in heavy change in the moment, prices falling :-)
I can use the full 64000 bit/s for data transfers with my Speed Dragon
plus have the 2nd B channel free at the same time. With the ACER T50 I
hope to use 128000 bit/s. My ISP on the other hand can't always give me
8 KByte/sec. BBSs can but I don't use them anymore.
--
Bernd Harries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freeyellow.com/members/bharries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +49 421 809 7351 priv. | MSB First!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 421 457 3966 offi. | Linux-m68k
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Medusa T40
------------------------------
From: josh greenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: linux network problem, linksys ethernet cards
Date: 29 Dec 1998 15:01:46 GMT
Scott. I dont have all the answers to your questions, but I have a couple of
suggestions...
Sendmaiil always takes awhile to start - be patient or dont start it at boot
time. Same for smb.
I am having a lot of difficulty with the etherfast as well. tons of errors on
transmitted packets and lots of buffer overruns. Any suggestions. The IP setup is
complete and correct.
TIA -Josh
"Scott M. Baker" wrote:
> Hello,
> I need some help with a configuration problem with Red Hat 5.2. I'm
> installing it into a Pentium-166 machine, PCI, SCSI, with a LinkSys
> etherfast network card.
>
> During boot, the machine hangs for several minutes while starting the
> sendmail and httpd daemons, and locks entirely while starting snmb.
> Removing the ethernet card fixes the problem and the machine boots
> without error, but of course without network support.
>
> Is there a hardware incompatibility? When entering network config, I
> chose the appropriate IP address & subnet mask, but left the nameserver
> options at default (perhaps this was not a good idea).
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I may be reached via email at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---
> Scott, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
