Linux-Hardware Digest #69, Volume #9 Thu, 31 Dec 98 00:13:44 EST
Contents:
Re: temp monitering hardware software (Kyle Dansie)
Canon BJC4300 with Redhat ("Christophe MICHEL")
Re: Iomega Zip drive (Kyle Dansie)
Primary Slave HD & FDISK (Ki-Won Lee)
Embedded video - Anybody use it? (Steve)
Re: RedHAt 5.1 and Canon BJC4300 printing (John Bousquet)
Re: PCMCIA modem: ActionTec DataLink (Neil Zanella)
Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem (Michael David Jones)
Re: Dual AudioPCI Sound Cards in RH5.2 (Shaun See)
Re: When will kernel 2.2 be released? (Victor Danilchenko)
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (dizzy)
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: How to install a 3dfx Banshee 16 mb in linux readhat 5.2 (Keith Blackwell)
Re: Trident Cyber 9397DVD works, but some minor problems (Christian Huebner)
Re: Iomega ditto max under SuSE 5.3 (Kyle Dansie)
Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem (Steve Mading)
Re: Linux Laptop (Kyle Dansie)
Re: Need for WinModem research? (was: Re: need to take action...) (Chris Lee)
Re: Linux SMP revisited ("Earl Malmrose")
Re: AWE64 or PCI128? (Kyle Dansie)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 20:10:56 -0700
From: Kyle Dansie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: temp monitering hardware software
mark ross wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Does anyone know of any I/O cards that will accept a temp probe and run
> under Linux.
> I need to monitor the temp of a room in a remote location.
>
> thanks
I found this page the other day. I have not bought one of these yet, but
it looks very interesting.
http://www.tatoosh.com/nexus/digitemp.shtml
Cheers,
Kyle Dansie
--
========================================================
Linux Rules
ZIP drive Mini-HOWTO
http://njtcom.com/dansie/zip-drive.html
or
http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/ZIP-Drive.html
========================================================
------------------------------
From: "Christophe MICHEL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Canon BJC4300 with Redhat
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 23:29:09 +0100
Hi
Has anyone succeeded in printing somethig but text only on a BJC4300 /
redhat 5.1
any help welcome
Thanx
Christophe MICHEL
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 20:13:13 -0700
From: Kyle Dansie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Iomega Zip drive
Try insmod ppa and see what you get. Details are in the HOWTO.
Cheers,
Kyle Dansie
--
========================================================
Linux Rules
ZIP drive Mini-HOWTO
http://njtcom.com/dansie/zip-drive.html
or
http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/ZIP-Drive.html
========================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ki-Won Lee)
Subject: Primary Slave HD & FDISK
Date: 31 Dec 1998 03:07:00 GMT
Hello,
I've successfully installed a 2nd HD on my box and my BIOS recognizes it
fully. It's a Quantum Fireball EX 6.4G. This is the unit on which I'd
like to dedicate Linux on.
The problem I'm having is that when I run Linux fdisk, it tells me that it
only has 784 cylinders instead of 1023. I installed RH 5.0 anyway to see
what happens and the install went without a hitch, but when I do a "df -h"
on it, it tells me the followng:
/dev/hd1 100M (this is my "/")
/dev/hd2 5.5G (this is my "/usr")
/dev/hd3 61M (this is my "/home")
and I have about a 100M of swap space accoring to my top. (Please excuse
me if the output of df doesn't look exact, I'm going by memory here)
As you can see, it's only recognizing about 5.8G at most of my HD instead
of 6.4G. The LBA is enabled for this HD as well in my BIOS and like I
said, it's fully recognized by it. According to fdisk, I got this info:
255 heads, 63 sectors, 784 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512
bytes.
Can someone please shed some light as to why fdisk is only recognizing
only part of my HD and not the fully 1023 cylinders? During the install,
I chose to check my HD for errors and there were none.
With Best,
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve)
Subject: Embedded video - Anybody use it?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 01:04:19 GMT
Hello,
I am looking to put together a redhat 5.2 system. Today I went to the
computer store for a pentium motherboard (I already have everything
else needed, except a video card) and the guy there tried to sell me a
EM-5571 Pentium board with TXPro II Embedded 64bit VGA. I was not sure
if this Embedded video would work well with X. Has anyone tried? Does
anyone know?
BTW, he pulled up the specs on a web page, so you can too!
http://www.eurone.com/em5571.htm
Also, it has sound built in, I wonder if I could get that to work as
well? (I don't really care about sound, however. OTOH, video is pretty
important!)
Thanks,
- Steve
------------------------------
From: John Bousquet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHAt 5.1 and Canon BJC4300 printing
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 18:25:14 -0500
Christophe MICHEL wrote:
> Hello everybody
> -----------------------
>
> I am desperately trying to print out at something with my redhat station
> onto my Canon BJC4300 but nothiung ever comes out of it except crude text.
>
> My kernel is hopefully configured for parallel printer and Printer tool
> is configured for Canon BJC 600 - BJC 4000 Unfortunately no BJC4300
> compatible driver seems to be available.
>
> Has someone ever succeeded in printing something except text with a
> Redhat 5.1 AND a Canon BJC 4300. If so, please tell me how you did, what are
> your configuration files ans so on..
>
> Mucha thanx a lot
>
> Christophe MICHEL
I purchased one just the other day. I found out that they ship from the
company preset in LQ mode. The solution for me was to do the following:
>From power off, press and hold the power on button until you hear 7 beeps and
then let it go. This will set it into BJ mode and it will then print text and
graphics (with a BC-20 ink cartridge) with Linux configured for Canon
BJC600-BJC4000. At least it worked for me. I haven't tried it with the colour
cartridge yet.
------------------------------
From: Neil Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PCMCIA modem: ActionTec DataLink
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:06:36 -0330
Hello,
Thanks to everybody that helped.
The modem is fully compatible with Linux and works perfectly under Linux.
Best Regards,
Neil
On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Neil Zanella wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am thinking about purchasing the following modem.
>
> I want to use it with Linux of course, and the Hardware HOWTO
>
> looks promising, but I thought I'd double check on this newsgroup
>
> to see if anyone out there tried this particular modem and had good/bad
>
> experiences with it under Linux. If you have used this modem with Linux
>
> then please tell me anout it: I'll be glad to hear from you.
>
> Here are the specs from the box:
>
> brand: ActionTec DataLink 56K PC Card Fax Modem
> features: V.90 standard, K56flex, PnP
> supports: DOS, Win3.1x, Win95, Win98, NT4.0 and up
>
> Since it says "Fax Modem" I am suuming it's not a Winmodem (nowhere on
>
> the box does it mentioned winmodem though no Linux, Unix, OS/2, Novell,
>
> etc... compatibility is mentioned.
>
> Finally, the box does not tell me if the fax capabilities make the modem
>
> act as a type 1, 2, or 2.0 data fax modem.
>
> Finally, I'd like to know how I can tell if it uses a Type I or Type II
> slot. If it's a Type III card then I will not be able to use it at all.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Any recommendations are very welcome,
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Neil
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael David Jones)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem
Date: 30 Dec 1998 23:07:36 -0500
Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>In comp.os.linux.advocacy, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael David Jones) writes:
>> This is where the Linux crowd needs to get a good stiff double shot of
>> the real world. People buy winmodems. They buy them because they're
>> cheap, and because they're good enough for most people's needs. If you
>> want those people to consider Linux, you need to make it work with the
>> hardware they have.
>Winmodems may be good enough for most people now, but they might
>regret buying one if they later try to upgrade to NT and then find
>that the WinModem is not supported.
In that case, wouldn't it be tremendously nice to be able to offer
Linux as an alternative upgrade path?
Mike Jones | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In truth, they have learned caution so well that many are in dager of
forgetting that market-driven, follow-the-leader companies usually end
up following the rest of the pack as well.
- Robert Hayes and William Abernathy, the Harvard Business Review (1980)
------------------------------
From: Shaun See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dual AudioPCI Sound Cards in RH5.2
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 21:12:05 -0700
==============C572B2A18082934D285193C5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Robert Spychala wrote:
> Has anyone installed two Ensonic AudioPCI soundcards under Linux RH 5.2 or any
> other distribution for that matter? I would like to be able to encode a live signal
>using Encoder 3.1 in two different bit-rates with one computer... is this possible?
>Yes or No anser would be great, so I won't waste my time doing something that is not
>possible with the AudioPCI souncard...
>
> thanks,
> r.S.
> http://www.wknc.ncsu.edu/
Humility comes from all directions... Here I am struggling to get my ONE ensonic
AudioPCI card working so I hit the new groups and what do I find? Someone trying to
get two working for reasons I can't even begin to understand? :)
My hats off to you Robert!
So why am I posting a response (other than to broadcast my ignorance to the world)?
Well, hopefully someone will read this, take pity on the small minded and help me out.
Here are my symptoms... RH5.2 and when I run sndconfig, it recognizes the card as a
Model ES1371 and everything looks great. However, when it attempts to play the sound
byte it comes out very choppy and garbled, not really recognizable... I've tried
manually configuring it as a ES1370 and
receive error messages that es1370.o is busy???
Has anyone else had similar problems and have they managed to resolve them?
Thanks again for both your help and to Robert for letting me piggyback off his
posting... :)
Shaun
--
- Shaun R. See # Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule
# and both commonly succeed, and are right. HL Mencken
==============C572B2A18082934D285193C5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Robert Spychala wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Has anyone installed two Ensonic AudioPCI soundcards
under Linux RH 5.2 or any
<br>other distribution for that matter? I would like to be able to encode
a live signal using Encoder 3.1 in two different bit-rates with one computer...
is this possible? Yes or No anser would be great, so I won't waste my time
doing something that is not possible with the AudioPCI souncard...
<p>thanks,
<br>r.S.
<br><a href="http://www.wknc.ncsu.edu/">http://www.wknc.ncsu.edu/</a></blockquote>
Humility comes from all directions... Here I am struggling to get
my ONE ensonic AudioPCI card working so I hit the new groups and what do
I find? Someone trying to get two working for reasons I can't
even begin to understand? :)
<p>My hats off to you Robert!
<p>So why am I posting a response (other than to broadcast my ignorance
to the world)? Well, hopefully someone will read this, take pity
on the small minded and help me out.
<p>Here are my symptoms... RH5.2 and when I run sndconfig, it recognizes
the card as a Model ES1371 and everything looks great. However, when
it attempts to play the sound byte it comes out very choppy and garbled,
not really recognizable... I've tried manually configuring it as
a ES1370 and receive error messages that es1370.o is busy???
<p>Has anyone else had similar problems and have they managed to resolve
them?
<p>Thanks again for both your help and to Robert for letting me piggyback
off his posting... :)
<p>Shaun
<pre>--
- Shaun R. See # Under democracy
one party always devotes its chief energies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # to trying to prove that the other party is
unfit to rule
# and both commonly succeed, and are right. HL Mencken</pre>
</html>
==============C572B2A18082934D285193C5==
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 13:40:02 -0500
From: Victor Danilchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: When will kernel 2.2 be released?
Phil Hunt wrote:
>
> Perhaps someone will decide to put NT inside an aircraft control system.
> (I know, but if they can do it for ships, they can do it for planes).
> Imagine a Lockheed Galaxy flying over Seattle, the BSOD, and the plane
> crashing on the HQ of a well-known company...
Oh, it would be such sweet, SWEET irony!
--
| Victor A. Danilchenko CSCF support |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] A313, 5-4231 |
+--------------------------------------------+
| Quando omni flunkus, moritati. |
------------------------------
From: dizzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 23:23:01 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> SOLUTION FOR THE PROBLEM I GOT. DO NOT GIVE ME IRRELEVANT BULLSH**
> SUCH AS TELLING ME TO PARTITION MY OTHER HARD DRIVE. I WILL CONTINUE
> TO POST THIS MESSAGE UNTIL SOMEONE HELPS ME FIX THIS PROBLEM !!!
LMAO!!!!
hehehehe.....uh huh.......
Linux Home page http://www.connix.com/~dizzy73/LBM.htm
------------------------------
From: Drg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 04:29:46 GMT
Very funny, creamfart. Now you can stuff some cream up your ****.
AHEHEHEHEHE !!!
On Thu, 31 Dec 1998 01:43:52 GMT, Pat Crean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>On 12/30/98, 7:37:41 PM, Drg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote regarding Re: PLEASE=20
>HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!:
>
>
>> SORRY, DOUGY BOY BUT I AIN'T GONNA PAY. Besides, I still have to make
>> sure my ethernet card works. As for posting, I CAN POST ALL I WANT
>> UNTIL I FIND A DECENT SOLUTION !!!
>
>
>You can post until hell itself freezes over, if you don't read the=20
>responses, it isn't going to do a damned bit of good. As far as I,=20
>and probably most of the other folks here that could help you, are=20
>concerned, you can stick with microsoft for the rest of your life. =20
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith Blackwell)
Subject: Re: How to install a 3dfx Banshee 16 mb in linux readhat 5.2
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:57:35 GMT
I'm in the process of getting mine to work. This URL should maybe
possibly help http://www.uno.edu/~adamico/banshee/Welcome.html
Good Luck
Keith
On 30 Dec 1998 20:22:11 GMT, "sergio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please help me.
>I dont now how to install my 3dfx
>Xwindows dont run.
------------------------------
From: Christian Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Trident Cyber 9397DVD works, but some minor problems
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 18:04:33 -0800
Christian Huebner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have installed the SVGA-server of XFree86 3.3.3 on my
> notebook, which has a Trident Cyber 9397 DVD chipset.
>
> 1) X starts okay in 8,16,24 and 32 bit. Resolution 1024x768
> 2) in 24-bit I the whole screen sometimes flickers. Most of
> the time its only an occasional flicker, but sometimes it
> will flicker several times in a row.
> Its as if the whole screen went blank forone or two scan periods.
> 3) in 32-bit the same phenomenon - very rarely - appears
> 4) in 16-bit I have not noticed it yet.
> 5) on the whole all the window operations are very slow, but usable.
> I may still have to get all the settings in XF86Config right,
> 6) In Windows the flicker never appears, so I doubt it has to do
> with an actual bug in the hardware.
>
> If someone has got better results please mail me Your XF86Config
> to compare.
What I forgot to say, some operations, like recover after the
screen saver (or the screen saver for itself for that matter)
seem to be fairly fast, while others (like dragging windows)
are awfully slow.
Anyway, XFree86 recognizes the Cyber9397DVD as a Cyber9397, which
seems to be okay and it even detects my 1024x768 TFT screen correctly.
Chris
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 19:43:19 -0700
From: Kyle Dansie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Iomega ditto max under SuSE 5.3
H�hne wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I've got SuSE 5.3 and I have iomega DITTO max-drive!
> How is it possible to use? How must I install it.
>
> My iomega DITTO max-drive is the parallel-port version!
> With which parameter must I use the mount-task!
>
> PLEASE HELP ME!
>
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I dont have one of these, but they can be used under Linux.
http://www.torque.net/parport/
Cheers,
Kyle Dansie
--
========================================================
Linux Rules
ZIP drive Mini-HOWTO
http://njtcom.com/dansie/zip-drive.html
or
http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/ZIP-Drive.html
========================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Mading)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: need to take action on the Winmodem problem
Date: 30 Dec 1998 22:35:59 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: My 2 cents worth. . .
: 1. As someone who has been working with both Windows (mostly NT 4.0) and
: Linux for the last few years nothing amazes me more than the general Linux
: communities reaction to WinModems. The attitude seems to be "They have the
: word Win in there name therefore they are evil. . . ". It is the exact type
: of thinking they blast from the Microsoft camp for. The Windows people say
: "if it's not made for Windows it doesn't matter because only these freaks who
: use Linux want it". Now it seems the Linux people ae starting to say "if it
: is made for Windows users it doesn't matter because its made for those money
: hungry, monolopistic, M$ people". Very interesting how times have changed.
You are dead wrong. While it's true that linux doesn't work with
winmodems, you are dead wrong as to the reasons why. The information
needed to write a winmodem driver is unavailable to linux programmers.
It doesn't *matter* whether or not linux people want to write windmodem
drivers - the specs are hidden and they *can't*.
As to the "winmodems suck" angle - the reason for saying so is 100%
technical, and not because of the word "win" in it. Putting the
modem's signal processing stuff into the OS's hands is a big waste.
However, even so, I do think that a part of the "winmodems suck"
attitude probably is sour grapes. After all, linux supports a lot
of other really inferior hardware out of necessity because it is
common and cheap, like IDE as opposed to SCSI. I am 100% confident
that *if* the information were available, someone *would* write a
linux winmodem driver and it would find its way into the main
distributions.
But unless the info is there, it remains a moot point.
--
Steve Mading: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~madings
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 19:58:26 -0700
From: Kyle Dansie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Laptop
Douglas (DOC) Hutchins wrote:
>
> I am shopping for a "high end" LapTop/Notebook. Currently looking at
> Dell, Gateway and Compaq. Want:
>
> 300Mhz Pentium II
> 256M ram
> 8Gig HD
> 14.1" Active Matrix Display with 4M of video ram
> DVD
> normal compliment of PCMCIA and I/O ports...
>
> Question: Is there a "best" choice for Linux HW compatibility?
>
I have had very good Luck with the Toshiba 4000CDS. It is not a "high
end" model, but its good enough for me. I am sure that Toshiba has a
model that can meet your specs.
If you have not already found it, take a look at the laptop page at
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/linux-laptop/
When you narrow down your selection to a specific model, then you might
want to try a post on comp.os.linux.portable to make sure there are not
any major problems before you buy.
Cheers,
Kyle Dansie
--
========================================================
Linux Rules
ZIP drive Mini-HOWTO
http://njtcom.com/dansie/zip-drive.html
or
http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/ZIP-Drive.html
========================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Lee)
Subject: Re: Need for WinModem research? (was: Re: need to take action...)
Date: 31 Dec 1998 04:38:43 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
>Thats what I want to hear in this NG: Something real usefull.
>If anyone can tell me, how I can listen to my PCI bus under WinXX, I
>would appreciate that.
>As I�m using a laptop I�m not willing to cahnge my modem, which is built
>in, and I can not believe that theres something that WinXX can do but
>not Linux! Can that be real?
It has nothing to with WinXX being able to do something that Linux can't,
but rather Linux not caring enough to bother doing it.
>And, as you wrote, I don�t believe that this piece of software will be
>too hard to write.
Then learn how to write it yourself. *You're* the one who owns the
Winmodem,not any of us.
------------------------------
From: "Earl Malmrose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux SMP revisited
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 18:56:22 -0800
Jasper Janssen wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On Mon, 28 Dec 1998 15:14:48 -0800, "Earl Malmrose"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>d s f o x @ c o g s c i . u c s d . e d u (David Fox) wrote in message ...
>>>
>>>Embedded in every (recent) Intel chip, but disabled in the Celeron line.
>>
>>Which SUCKS. A dual Celeron setup would be pretty nice and cheap.
>
>*yawn* It's been done. see:
>
>http://bxboards.com/dual.htm
You'll be yawning all right, after you stay up late trying to get the
modifications to work correctly without toasting your CPUs. Not exactly an
easy thing to do. Have you done it?
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 20:04:29 -0700
From: Kyle Dansie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AWE64 or PCI128?
Tim Gajewski, KU4IY wrote:
>
> Hello Everybody,
> I am looking to buy a new sound card, either an AWE64 or PCI128. I saw
> in snconfig that the AWE64 is supported, but I am wondering if it is
> easy to setup the PCI128?
>
> Tim
Dont know about the PCI128, but I do have one of the AWE64 sound cards
and it works just fine. The install went just like the HOWTO doc said it
should.
http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/Soundblaster-AWE.html
Cheers,
Kyle Dansie
--
========================================================
Linux Rules
ZIP drive Mini-HOWTO
http://njtcom.com/dansie/zip-drive.html
or
http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/ZIP-Drive.html
========================================================
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
