Linux-Hardware Digest #501, Volume #9 Thu, 25 Feb 99 21:13:37 EST
Contents:
Re: 2.2.0/2.2.1 SMP kernel problem ("Tim Snider")
Re: Installing Linux From A local Hardrive ("Roger Cooper")
Re: Elite Linux machines (was Re: Is there a FAQ concerning the MaxtorDiamondMax
17.2gb HD?) ("Tom Emerson")
Re: 3151 Terminal. ("John Motazedi")
Re: stuck in 320x200, Riva TNT + Linux: Solution ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: MCA Ethernet 3c529 2.2.1 not seen (Shaw Carruthers)
Re: linux mca 3c523 support (Shaw Carruthers)
Drivers for Teles S0/16.3 PnP (Ricardo D'Aguiar)
Re: anyone have a ATI tv tuner card working in Linux? (David Utidjian)
Re: _Good_ (support 5+ systems) Monitor/Mouse/Keyboard switch for pc... (Rick Beall)
Re: two ethernet cards ("Martin")
Re: SVGA Console? ("ne...")
Aldi market Scanner in line w/ lp0 & printer ("Carsten")
Re: Modem on COM5? ("Brian")
SonicVibes - no sound (Peter Riggs)
Re: RAID solutions for Linux... (BL)
Linux and Low cost touchscreens ("JT")
Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing? ("David A. Frantz")
Re: Which HP DeskJet to buy/not to buy? - quick advice needed, please!
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Tim Snider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2.2.0/2.2.1 SMP kernel problem
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 14:08:53 -0800
I'm running fine on a S16996 DLUA Thunder 2... Kernel 2.2.1 based on top of
REdHat 5.2
TJ
Trent Piepho wrote in message <7b2gvm$55s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>L/R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I'm testing 2.2.0/2.2.1 SMP kernel on Tyan Tomcat III 1563D (166MM
>>dual)
>>but my system crashes with internal and external cache bios settings
>>enabled.
>>Only disabling the settings Linux becomes very stable....
>>Is it a known problem for Tyan boards?
>>I have an Award Bios v. 4.01 , are there particular settings to solve
>>the problem?
>
>I don't know about kernel 2.2 just yet, but I've been running 2.0 on a
Tomcat
>III with dual 166-nonMMX processsors for a long time. I don't have this
>problem. I'm going to try 2.0 soon and see how it works.
------------------------------
From: "Roger Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Installing Linux From A local Hardrive
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 23:07:21 +1100
More information please
1) is the hard drive on the same machine
2) is it the boot drive
3) why do you want to do it
4) have you read the redhat documentation, I think the install from hard
drive is one of the options in the install program.
Roger
Tony wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello
>
>Can someone please head me to some tips on installing linux from a local
>harddrive. I have a dos drive and will copy all the redhat distribution
>onto it, then i plan to install it from there.
>
>Any help/tips most appreciated
>
>Thanks
>
>Tony
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Tom Emerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Elite Linux machines (was Re: Is there a FAQ concerning the
MaxtorDiamondMax 17.2gb HD?)
Date: 25 Feb 1999 22:14:10 GMT
Ian Tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I hope I haven't opened a can of worms by continuing this thread and
> renaming it...
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, the mengsk files wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Question.... is there any justification for buying a *second* 17.2gb
> > drive? :)
>
> Ever heard of RAID?
> I'm looking at maybe hooking up two IBM 10.1G drives in a RAID-0 array.
As
> long as they are on different channels, they can both be accessed at the
> same time. I might also have to get a Promise UDMA interface since I
> already have an IDE disk and CDROM. About AUS$800 for 20.2G (18.8GB :)
> capable of probably over 20MB/s!
Save your money on the "promise" -- per reports here and on
REC.VIDEO.DESKTOP (where the Fastrack is in high demand), there "is not now
nor will there ever be" linux support for the fastrack (as in, "support
FROM promise" -- I guess you can say they've promised not to support it)
Specs are closed, and as you mentioned, linux can already do this "in the
kernel".
Another alternative is a company called "Medea" -- they make dedicated
hardware raid-0/5 (?) devices that contain from 2 to 4 (or 5, I guess)
drives, but since all the "raid" stuff is done at the drive, it looks like
one very BIG very FAST drive (anyone for a 65gig drive with a sustained
transfer rate of 36mb/second?)
Again, let me point you to rec.video.desktop if you don't already know of
it -- lots of pointers on raid as well as video capture/editing/playback
------------------------------
From: "John Motazedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: 3151 Terminal.
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:20:31 -0600
I believe ctrl (bottom left) and Enter (bottom right) switches sessions. I
also believe ctrl (bottom left) and - (top right) gets into setup
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7akh6f$86p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Hmm.. how exactly can I hot-key between 2 sessions on my Infowindow 3153?
I
>have been looking for this answer for quite some time.. never been able to
>find it... also, I just acquired 9 IBM 3151's, and I'm not sure how to
>access the terminal setup (within the terminal itself.. there has to be a
>way..)
>
>I would appreciate any assistance. Thanks!
>
>-Roger
>
>P.S. Could you C.C. any replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks!
>
>
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> A 3153 will let you hot key between two sessions or hook up to two
>> systems. I don't believe the 3151 has that capaibility - it has one
"host"
>> port and one pass-thru port for a printer. You can certainly use the
3151
>> terminal on Linux if you send the terminfo (or termcap - depending on
which
>> the applications you use on Linux use) entry for the 3151 and it should
be
>> just fine.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul
>>
>> Derek Kwan wrote:
>>
>> > Hello World,
>> >
>> > I have just order a IBM 3151 terminal, and I was wondering if it is
>> > possible to use as a regular dumb terminal. For example hook up with my
>> > Linux box (BTW, isn't 3151 have 2 comm ports?) so I can switch between
>> > terminals?
>> >
>> > Derek
>>
>>
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: stuck in 320x200, Riva TNT + Linux: Solution
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 22:23:10 GMT
All,
I found the solution to the below problem and I hope that this helps someone
else. The problem was being caused by the XF86Setup program creating a
faulty XF86Config file when I ran it more than once on the same file. The
solution was to delete my XF86Config file, run XF86Setup, choose the Riva TNT
card and then pick a basic video mode (800x600 or 640x480) at 16bpp. Once
this was saved I then opened the XF86Config file and added the rest of the
video modes manually. Now it works fine. I hope that this helps someone
else.
Matt
In article <7b3t84$29k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm running RedHat 5.2 (Linux 2.0.36) and I've just installed XFree86 3.3.3
> and the latest XF86_SVGA server. I run XF86Setup and choose Riva TNT from
> the list (my card is a PCI STB Velocity 4400, 16MB RAM). When I start X I'm
> stuck in 320x200 resolution. When I shut down X I can see from the text on
> the screen that it was using "Built in mode". I've tried everything that I
> can think of. My system is an old Pentium 120, 64MB RAM. Any help and/or
> tips would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaw Carruthers)
Subject: Re: MCA Ethernet 3c529 2.2.1 not seen
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:15:17 GMT
"Barry Titmarsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I need help to install MCA Network card to kernel 2.2.1 into an IBM m77i MCA
>the IBM MCA bus bios see the card and remorts it. Linux boots see my fdomain
>scsi but not the network card which is on IRQ9 Slot3 address 200H
>
>Is this because the 3com MCA card are not yet supported in Linux 2.2.x
It was working in recent kernels, maybe the code changes in 2.2.2
broke it.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaw Carruthers)
Subject: Re: linux mca 3c523 support
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:15:17 GMT
Thomas Lemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Yes I know - 3c523-card for linux is __experimental__ BUT: on my ps2/model
>80 it used to work for linux without problem on 2.0.35 with mca-patch while
>the esdi driver did not work on this card. Now with 2.2.1 the esdi driver
>and the hard disk seems to be recognized by linux but the 3c523 works but
>with many errors.
>
>Is there anyone who knows something about this problem? I would like to send
>some bug reports but where to?
>
Post to linux-kernel.
>Yours
>
>Thomas Lemm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ricardo D'Aguiar)
Subject: Drivers for Teles S0/16.3 PnP
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 12:49:48 GMT
Does anyone knows were I can get Teles S0/16.3 PnP for Windows NT4.0 /
Linux or SCO Unix
Thanks
------------------------------
From: David Utidjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: anyone have a ATI tv tuner card working in Linux?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 18:41:59 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Klement, Christopher (EXCHANGE:CRK:5T31) wrote:
> Hi I am wondering if anyone has an ATI tv tuner to work in Linux. if
> anyone does, i would appreciate an info on how to do it. thanx.
>
No one has it running under Linux and no one will.... not until ATI
releases the specs on the card. ATI have been total dorks about this
card (and most of their other stuff). They claim that they cannot
release specs because the design of the card is "proprietary". If I am
not mistaken they use Bt chips on their cards.... (yep mine has a Bt
829)... and Bt is forthcoming with the data but not ATI.
I will not buy another ATI product because of their stance on this
card... I have since bought STB and Hauppauge "TV" cards and I told ATI
so. I suggest you do the same.
People have been begging ATI for a couple of years now and still
no-dice. They won't even release a proprietary driver. IMO their
attitude is just plain stupid.
After having said all that... does anyone wanna buy a slightly used but
still serviceable ATI-TV tuner card cheap? I will, of course, include
all packaging and W95 software that came with it.
-David Utidjian-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Rick Beall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Subject: Re: _Good_ (support 5+ systems) Monitor/Mouse/Keyboard switch for pc...
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 18:37:02 -0500
I had a Belkin box but did not like it because
1) It lost the mouse sometimes
2) You have to be switched to, that is looking at any box which is
booting up. (You can boot more than 1 computer at a time
3) The keyboard line simply stopped working after 6 months.
I bought a Cybex switch and I don't have the above problems anymore.
Love the Cybex switch! It was worth the little extra money.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <01be5c9f$40870ae0$240b5e18@workstation>,
> "Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I currently have a two-computer vga/serial/kb switch that is made by PC
> > Concepts that I purchased from Fry's Electronics for ~$35. Now, I am
> > looking to add another computer and would still like to have control over
> > all three boxen from my single monitor, mouse, and keyboard. Could anyone
> > suggest a better one than the one I have now, possibly one that just just
> > push a soft button instead of turning a large (0.5") switch for each
> > computer...
>
> We use a Belkin powered switch box here at work. The powered ones work much
> much better than the unpowered ones. I think they make 2,4,6 and 8 port
> models. The 4-port we use ran about $200, iirc. We use it with NT Server and
> WS. It does have a bad habit of "losing" the mouse once in a while but a
> reboot usually fixes that. You can get them and the required cable kits from
> just about any good mail-order place. I'd recommend CDW.
>
> el
>
> --
> Electricity comes from electrons; morality comes from morons.
>
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: two ethernet cards
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 22:52:22 -0000
Hi,
Do you have a sound card in the machine ? The reason I ask is that some
sound cards have an MPU401 midi interface which has a default IRQ of 9, so
this could be your problem. If so, try removing the sound card and see if
the problem disappears.
Martin
Jeffrey Fulmer wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to configure two ethernet cards on a Slackware linux
>computer using kernel support for ne2000. The first card is located at
>0x300 IRQ 5, the second at 0x320 IRQ 9. I added:
>
>append="ether=5,0x300,eth0 ether=9,0x320,eth1"
>
>to my lilo.conf
>
>The machine boots and picks up eth0 and that card is working fine. The
>problem is that eth1 is not recognized at all. There are no failure
>messages in any of the logs. I'm fairly certain that I don't have a
>hardware conflict. This computer is a single boot linux configuration.
>
>Any insight would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks, Jeff.
>
>
>
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
From: "ne..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SVGA Console?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:59:37 GMT
On Feb 25, 1999 at 09:44, Chive eloquently wrote:
>Is it possible to run Linux consoles at higher resolution? If so, how?
Should be. The package you are looking for is SVGATextMode.
Also in lilo.conf, try using vga=ask.
--
NEVER swerve to hit a lawyer riding a bicycle -- it might be your bicycle.
------------------------------
From: "Carsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Aldi market Scanner in line w/ lp0 & printer
Date: 26 Feb 1999 00:33:38 GMT
I'm pretty much a newbie to Linux (S.u.S.E 6.0) Setting up my printer on
Lp1
worked fine, but now I want to use my scanner as well. It's a noname from
"Alid" market and it's physically connected to LPT1; from the scanner,
another parallel cable goes to the printer. How could I make use of the
scanner?
Thanx,Carsten
------------------------------
From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Modem on COM5?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 18:51:06 -0600
And just maybe you are very STUPID for replying to a very good question and
wasted your own bandwidth and time. What do you seem to gain by replying in
this manner? It took up your time and the individual did not get the answer
he was looking for. You are very agogant and an Asshole! Replys of this
nature help no one in this newsgroup. If you are not ready to give an
honest answer do not reply at all. This newsgroup is not being personnally
stored on your hard drive so do not act like repeated questions are taking
up your time or hard drive space. There are newbies out there that do not
wish to peruse the internet in search of an answer that might not be so
easily found. And as a mater of fact, there are only 8 messages that cover
linux and com5. This is nowhere near the billion messages you are refering
to. Do everyine a favor and sit in your room and adimire yourself and shut
the #$%& up unless you are here to give valid replies to the questions aske
here....
To all the "Newbies" out there, please excuse any replies like the one
listed below. Ask your questions here. Linux has recieved its grace due to
it's open liscenseing and GROUP EFFORT where we become a community of our
own and and support each other. No one knows all the answers. Even longtime
"expert" users of Linux run into stumbling blocks from time to time and seek
help of thier peers. It is this sense of community that makes Linux a great
OS!
>Jim Hill wrote:
>> (Had you checked Deja News prior to acquiring this device you would
>> have seen, oh, about a billion messages covering this.)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Riggs)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: SonicVibes - no sound
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 21:24:53 +0000
I am using Kernel 2.2.1 with SonicVibes sound support compiled in
but I cannot get any sound output. Previously, on an upgraded
RedHat 5.0 running 2.0.36 with the OSSFree driver I had no problem
so I know the card/speakers work.
On bootup the sound card is detected and appears to be initialised,
with these messages in kernlog:-
sv: version v0.10 time 18:09:24 Jan 31 1999
sv: BIOS did not allocate DDMA channel A io, allocated at 0xac00
sv: BIOS did not allocate DDMA channel C io, allocated at 0xac10
sv: io ports: 0x6300 0x6400 0x6500 0x6600 0x6700 0xac00 0xac10
sv: found adapter at io 0x6400 irq 10 dmaa 0xac00 dmac 0xac10 revision 3
if I try cat /dev/sndstat, I get:-
cat: /dev/sndstat: Operation not supported by device
There are no interrupt or I/O clashes so I am at a loss.
Any suggestions?
peter.
------------------------------
From: BL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RAID solutions for Linux...
Date: 25 Feb 1999 15:04:37 GMT
mylex is good on linux with BX boards. but with VIA (k6) systems, its not
100% stable (my personal experience - not rumor).
go to leonard's webpage: www.dandelion.com
Bill Dossett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hi,
: Can anyone recommend any hardware RAID solutoins
: for Linux... DPT, Adaptec? Mylex... do any of these
: have Linux drivers? Any pointers/urls would be much
: appreciated. Also, is is there any any type of
: clustering available with Linux, Red Hat in particular.
: Thanks
: Bill
: --
: No soup for you!
: --
: public key -> http://www.bill.co.uk/pubkey.html
------------------------------
From: "JT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux and Low cost touchscreens
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 15:48:20 GMT
I am looking for a low cost solution for a touchscreen on Linux. Seems that
ELO has a Linux monitor and driver for a cost of around $600 (14" monitor).
There are touchscreen kits out there which sell for around $150 and fit on
existing monitors however I've only been able to locate windows drivers for
these low end units. Can anyone help me here. Is anyone able to develop a
driver for these low end systems?
Thanks Jim
------------------------------
From: "David A. Frantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 19:13:33 -0500
Hi Robert;
Robert Krawitz wrote in message ...
>"David A. Frantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Try this site http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/more_than_1GB.html to
gets a
>> little info on the current I386 capability. Nothing specific on XEON
>> there, well at least I didn't find anything. Sounds like your trying
to
>> apply a low end (Yes I mean the XEON) PC chip to a project that requires
a
>> 64 bit CPU. You may want to consider an Alpha, or a POWERPC box from
IBM.
>
>I think this is a tad unfair. I'm disappointed that Linus doesn't
>want to enable large memory addressing on the x86.
As with any general purpose operateing system there are trade offs, one
outstanding feature of Linux is the freedom to transform it into something
that suits your purposes. The reallity is that there is nothing to be
gained by trying to use a special capability of the XEON just to fillfull
the special needs of a few users. This is especially the case when the
Chip and Chip SETs are not suited for the application. I firmly believe
that if you really need 64 bit addressing to main memory then you need to
look at a 64 bit system.
>
>There's a lot more software available for the x86, even on Linux, than
>on other platforms. Also, x86 boxes are much cheaper than Alphas and
>PowerPC's. The cost of the extra memory somewhat softens the blow,
>but 4 GB of RAM is about $6000 these days, so the economics are very
>different from what they were a few years ago.
I don't disagree here at all, but this is a very new concept (low cost
memory and hardware that can address it) so its no surprise that Linux on
i386 has limits that it may not have on other systems. By the way I'm not
at all sure what Linux capacity is on the other architectures, but the
referenced web sight does explain in detail the limitations of i386 kernels.
Also keep in mind that the hardware you are discussing is very new so it
unlikly to be in use by the majority of Linux Kernel Hackers. What I
would suggest is contacting one of the Alpha vendors that support Linux and
ask what they are capable of offering. All in all I would be surprised if
anybody would want to mess around with 36 bit addressing on the Xeon when
better solutions exist and the life of the Xeon family could be cut short as
new technology rolls out of Intel and other places that will most likely
have a longer life span.
>
>Job mixes that are more memory/IO than computation intensive (which is
>the case for a lot of commercial data processing) would benefit
>greatly from the availability of large memory on commodity hardware.
Why would anyone do commercial data processing in large pools of main
memory? Seems awfully risky. Actually large memory systems and heavy
computation base apps go hand in hand.
Dave
>
>[Disclaimer: that I'm not a disinterested observer: I work for Torrent
>Systems: http://www.torrent.com/. However, this posting is completely
>my own opinion, and does not reflect any official company policy.]
>
>> dave
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7b0un2$i3e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >Intel Xeon processor + NX chipset can support up to 8GB DRAM. Is there
any
>> >Linux support for this? If not, does anyone know if it's in the works?
>> >
>> >I'm looking for an OS platform which will handle these large memories.
>> >NT addresses the >4GB range as a sort of "cache buffer" accessible only
>> from
>> >user more. Normal NT kernel code will be able to access the lower 4GB
only.
>> >This solution is a poor one for my application - I would like to be able
to
>> >access the entire address space from kernel mode as well, e.g. DMA, etc.
>> >Will Linux do something better than this?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >-Mark
>> >
>> >-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>--
>Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/
>
>Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
>Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
>--Eric Crampton
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Which HP DeskJet to buy/not to buy? - quick advice needed, please!
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 22:38:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniele Bernardini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same printer and I'am having problems with black printing:
> too much ink. Gamma correction doesn't help... :(
Before sending the file to lp?, send the following PCL command: Esc*o-1M (or
the octal sequence: 027 042 111 045 049 077) to put the printer in EconoFast
mode.
I successfully tried it on a HP697c.
Serban
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
