Linux-Hardware Digest #500, Volume #10           Wed, 16 Jun 99 00:13:45 EDT

Contents:
  Re: SCSI cd writer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Riva Tnt's and x windows... ("George Holt")
  Re: Adaptec 1505 (Matthias Kilian)
  Vodoo Banshee ("Teresa Catalina Ronconi")
  Re: geo_comp_addr: Cylinder number is too big (Leejay Wu)
  Re: mother board compatiabilities (Skaya)
  SCSI cd writer (Stefano Ghirlanda)
  Re: Ensoniq AudioPCI S5016 Sound Card Support? ("Kris Erpenbeck")
  Re: Linux Backup Solution. (Marc Mutz)
  Re: Dual celeron (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
  Re: Dual Celerons, is it possible? (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
  Re: Dual celeron (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
  Re: Celeron or PII? (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
  Re: Help! NS 8 fails, hardware or me? (Leejay Wu)
  Re: X-windows on Voodoo3!!! HELP!! (Julian Choquette)
  Zip 250: file system? (Burra)
  System Won't Turn Off (PD)
  help re: Logitech Mousman Wheel (Michael John)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SCSI cd writer
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:00:03 GMT

Hi Stefano!

The only advice I have is to get a SCSI CDR that is on the list and has
it's own support linux driver.  I have a Panasonic/Matsushita 7502 which
is on the list but uses the generic SCSI-3mm driver and I'm still
wrestling with it trying to burn an audio CD.  This is after many kernel
compiles.  My friend has one of the Teac's on the supported list and he
can burn audio CDs flawlessly at 4x speed.  So, I hope this helps you
out.  I'm just trying to relieve you of some headaches.

Mike McMahon


In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefano Ghirlanda) wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'm about to buy a SCSI cd writer... should I take particular
attention to
> anything special that is not in the CD-Writer-HOWTO or the hardware
> compatibility list?
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Stefano
>
> --
>  Stefano Ghirlanda, Zoologiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet
>     Office: D554, Arrheniusv. 14, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
> Phone: +46 8 164055, Fax: +46 8 167715, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    Support Free Science, look at: http://rerumnatura.zool.su.se
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: "George Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Riva Tnt's and x windows...
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:10:33 -0700

Hi... I'm having problems configuring my nvida riva-tnt (16mb) to work with
my distribution of Red Hat 5.1 and X windows...
the card will work fine in text mode and in Windows 98....

but even when I try for the normal vga mode I run into serious problems....
When I've tried it with the svga server (not accelerated) it either displays
in a resolution near the 300's or hi res garbage. I don't know where to go
for setup info on this card... It's OEM. My monitor is a viewsonic e771 and
they've provided all of the information needed to set it up properly...

Monitor properties
video syncs
horizontal 30-70 hz
vertical   50-120 Hz

works upto 1280x1024 NI at 66hz
1024x768 at 87
800x600 at 110
640x480 at 120

card properties

frequencies are for 8bpp 16bpp and 32bpp

640x480 240hz
800x600 240hz
960x720 120hz
1024x768 170hz
1152x864 140hz
1280x1024 100hz
1600x1200 85hz
1920x1080 85hz
1920x1200 75hz (60hz for 32bpp)


Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as the newsgroups...

thanks ahead of time...

George Holt



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthias Kilian)
Subject: Re: Adaptec 1505
Date: 15 Jun 1999 22:43:05 GMT

> Does anyone know if there is support for this in the kernel?  If so then
> which adaptec module can I use?  If not then is there a patch?

Use the aha152x driver. You will have to tell it about io port and irq.

For example, if you're using the aha1505ae (shipped for example with
the Microtek ScanMaker X6), you should use the following option line
in conf.modules:

options aha152x aha152x=0x140,9,7,1

Kili

------------------------------

From: "Teresa Catalina Ronconi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Vodoo Banshee
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 01:00:54 -0300

How i configure my Vodoo Banshee to run whit linux and xwindows ??

Im sebastian
plese back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: Leejay Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: geo_comp_addr: Cylinder number is too big
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 12:02:03 -0400

Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.linux.hardware: 14-Jun-99 Re:
geo_comp_addr: Cylinder.. by Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >Your new kernel image is probably located somewhere above the 1024th
> >cylinder (1135?) Lilo can only access data below the 1024th cylinder.
> >You probably created one big partition. Now you see why it is usefull
> >to create separate partitions. Atleast create a small partition for /
> >or /boot so that your kernels stay below that 1024 limit.
>  
> This is a ridiculous limitation bordering on bug status.

<sigh> The limitation is due to a combination of BIOS design and IDE 
specs, 'ccording to the Large Disk mini-HT.  And the BIOS INT13 call
was designed many years ago...

Unless, of course, you'd rather LILO ignore filesystems and so forth and
go direct to the lowest levels, writing directly to the accessible part
of the disk...
--
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]        | the silly student          |
|--------------------------| he writes really bad haiku |
|   #include <stddiscl.h>  | readers all go mad         |

    


------------------------------

From: Skaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mother board compatiabilities
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:47:44 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> There is some mother board that internal already contain sound chipset
> and we are not required to install another sound card.  Is it okey for
> us to use this mother board for Linux OS?

it depends. I have a mb with "sound pro" chipset. totally unknown, but
works perfectly with the sb driver. is plug n pray, so I had to tweak a
bit with isapnp, but nothing terrible.

I think most chipsets are either sb, either ess compatible (which gets
you back to the sb driver)

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefano Ghirlanda)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: SCSI cd writer
Date: 15 Jun 1999 15:52:45 GMT

Hi everyone,
I'm about to buy a SCSI cd writer... should I take particular attention to
anything special that is not in the CD-Writer-HOWTO or the hardware
compatibility list?

Thanks a lot,
Stefano

-- 
 Stefano Ghirlanda, Zoologiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet
    Office: D554, Arrheniusv. 14, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46 8 164055, Fax: +46 8 167715, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Support Free Science, look at: http://rerumnatura.zool.su.se

------------------------------

From: "Kris Erpenbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ensoniq AudioPCI S5016 Sound Card Support?
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:15:03 -0600


Tim wrote in message ...
>"Kris Erpenbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just installed SuSE Linux 6.1 on my PII-400 system.
>> I am unable to get sound working, and I think its because
>> I have a Ensoniq AudioPCI S5016 card which from what
>> I can tell is unsupported.  I was wondering if anyone can
>> tell me if indeed this card is or is not supported?
>
> Yes. Supported well by the  ALSA drivers. Get them and install
>them. Then run the setup utility and of  you go. Either  that or get a
>2.2.x kernel and use the drivers in that.
>
>--
>
> http://www.dur.ac.uk/~d61920  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                         http://surf.to/timzpayj

Thank you all, got it working.... Just had to use the es1370 module instead
of 1371
and then it worked.  (Well sort of, also had to get sox downloaded in order
to play
sound files).

Thanks again....

Kris



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 18:14:57 +0200
From: Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Backup Solution.

Greg de Freitas wrote:
> 
> Marc Mutz wrote:
> 
> o Cheap these days, buy two!.
> o On-line access to backed-up data!.
> o Fast backup!.
> o Use some of it for swap!
> o Set the root f/s up in lilo.conf, = emergency boot!
>         (only need to change
>         /backupdisk-mnt-pnt/etc/fstab afterwards)!
> o Bootable backup is better than _NO_ backup!
Don't do that if you really mean to *backup* you data. Any wild app that
has root permissions will be able to write to the second HD, even if not
mounted. Not to speak about fire or coffee spilled all over the box...
For a *backup* you should use something, with which you can do the
following:
1.) Store the media far away from the location of the computer,
2.) Backup incrementally, i.e. everyday what has changed, w/o (!)
overwriting the perviously stored file. The reason for this is that you
might want to access older files than the ones last backed up, because
you did not reconginze there was an error present in one of them when
you last backed up.

So tapes are the only reasonable alternative, be it DAT or something
else.

Marc

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Subject: Re: Dual celeron
Date: 16 Jun 1999 10:00:04 +0800

>>>>> "Tmack" == Tmack  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


    Tmack> That was only for the SEPP (slot1) celerons. It involved a
    Tmack> little soldering, and drilling out a pin from the cpu. The
    Tmack> new ppga (socket370) cel's can be easily put into
    Tmack> "slockets" requiring little or no modification, then fit
    Tmack> into a dual slot1 board. I have built 2 such systems, both
    Tmack> running 300a's at 450, 2.2v no problem.

Plus: the  quality slockets  have jumpers to  let you select  the core
voltage, FSB clock rate  as well as enabling/disabling dual operation.
That's  very convenient  for hackers  who want  to re-enable  the dual
capabilities of the Celeron core, and to overlock their processors.




-- 
Lee Sau Dan                     $(0,X)wAV(B(Big5)                    ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ) 
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| http://www.cs.hku.hk/~sdlee                        e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Subject: Re: Dual Celerons, is it possible?
Date: 16 Jun 1999 10:13:57 +0800

>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Enriquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

    Tony> Are there motherboards that support dual celeron processors?
    Tony> Is this even possible?

Dual Slot1 motherboards will do the job.


-- 
Lee Sau Dan                     $(0,X)wAV(B(Big5)                    ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ) 
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| http://www.cs.hku.hk/~sdlee                        e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Subject: Re: Dual celeron
Date: 16 Jun 1999 10:12:45 +0800

>>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


    Stuart> I read on the Web somewhere today that dual Celeron's need
    Stuart> all kinds of jumpers, drilling the motherboard etc.  I
    Stuart> don't think most people are willing to do that versus
    Stuart> going out and buying a uni-P2 system.

Your information is wrong and  outdated.  See the other people's reply
to your message.



    Stuart> BTW, what software can you run that takes advantage of the
    Stuart> multi-threading capabilities of Linux?  

You don't have to run  multi-threaded program to take advantage of the
second CPU.   If you have two  or more concurrent  PROCESSES, then the
kernel schedule  will put  them on the  two CPU's  automatically.  (In
another reply, you  should have learnt that UNIX  have many background
processes,  called "daemons".   [  In Win  NT  terminology, these  are
"services",  but   UNIX  "daemons"  are  usually   more  flexible  and
configurable.  ]  Each daemon  supports a  different service.   Two or
more daemons  (e.g. one Web server,  one FTP server,  one NNTP server)
can concurrently server more than one clients.  When they do so, they,
as different processes, will take advantage of your multiple CPU.

On a  multi-user multi-processing Linux  system, you don't have  to do
much  to exploit  the  extra CPU's.  The  kernel keeps  on giving  any
otherwise-idle CPU some useful job to do.



    Stuart> I am currently on M$ systems, 

I  see,  you're  M$-oriented  and  hence you  ask  for  multi-threaded
programs.  In Linux,  processes (i.e. "tasks" in NT)  are handled very
efficiently,  so efficient that  it is  close to  threads in  NT.  So,
you'll   find  more   multi-process  applications   than  multi-thread
applications in Linux.



BTW, I used to stress-test  my dual-Celeron 300->450 system by running
2 CPU-intensive processes, both of them being one-liners:

        gzip -9 < /dev/zero > /dev/null &
        bzip2 -9 < /dev/zero > /dev/null &

The UNIX  shells are  so powerful  that you can  do many  funny things
using one-liners.  That's  quick and handy.  What to  stress test your
CPU's on  NT?  There is no  simple command.  You'll have  to find some
programs that do lots of calculations.


Nowadays, I play with 'mprime' (http://www.mersenne.org).  'mprime' is
a  single-process,   single-thread  program.   However,   running  two
concurrent instances  of it, I  can have two  concurrent CPU-intensive
processes to fully exploit my two Celerons.


-- 
Lee Sau Dan                     $(0,X)wAV(B(Big5)                    ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ) 
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| http://www.cs.hku.hk/~sdlee                        e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Subject: Re: Celeron or PII?
Date: 16 Jun 1999 09:57:44 +0800

>>>>> "V" == V Doan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


    V> Can you give me the specifics of your system.  I would like to
    V> build a dual overclocked system myself.

I refer  to the  following discussion board,  where you can  find many
people's  experience on  building and  dual Celerons  and overclocking
them.

        http://www.kikumaru.com/bbs/board/arc/n/nandemo/27_index.shtml



-- 
Lee Sau Dan                     $(0,X)wAV(B(Big5)                    ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ) 
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| http://www.cs.hku.hk/~sdlee                        e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

------------------------------

From: Leejay Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: Help! NS 8 fails, hardware or me?
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 12:35:37 -0400

Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.linux.admin: 15-Jun-99 Help! NS 8 fails,
hardware .. by Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> I'm new to backups and have a shiny new Seagate SCSI-2 NS 8 TR-4 tape
> unit.  The install was easy and smooth but when I tried to do a
> backup, everything is all wrong but I don't get any disgnostic error
> messages!  I'm trying to follow examples in the SAG:
>  
> [root@localhost /root]# mt -f /dev/st0 rewind
> [root@localhost /root]# mt -f /dev/st0 erase
> [I need to erase the tape first, right?  I got an error message when I
> tried with a fresh tape that had not been erased.]

Yes, at least according to the Ftape HOWTO; there's a bit about file marks
that it expects.

> [root@localhost /root]# tar -c -v -f /dev/st0 /home/amead/L5/
> tar: Removing leading `/' from absolute path names in the archive
 
This one line, methinks, is the key to everything below.

> home/amead/L5/

...as in:  

It's not storing something called /home/amead/L5/, but home/amead/L5.

> home/amead/L5/README
> home/amead/L5/Makefile
> home/amead/L5/bscript
> [... and so on...]
> home/amead/L5/amead2
> [root@localhost /root]# mt -f /dev/st0 rewind
> [root@localhost /root]# tar -dc -v -f /dev/st0
> home/amead/L5: File does not exist

...which makes sense.  Why?  You're in /root, right?  And those filenames
in the tape archive are *not* absolute, because they lack the leading
slash.  Ergo, it's looking for

  /root/home/amead/L5

in this particular case.  AFAIK, this seems to be done so that it's harder
to accidentally overwrite your existing installation -- e.g. you can 
safely expand from tape into another filesystem, or whatever.

> home/amead/L5/README: File does not exist
> home/amead/L5/Makefile: File does not exist
> home/amead/L5/bscript: File does not exist
> [... and so on ...]
> home/amead/L5/amead2: File does not exist
> [root@localhost /root]# tar -td -f /dev/st0
> home/amead/L5/
> home/amead/L5/README
> home/amead/L5/Makefile
> [... and so on ...]
> home/amead/L5/amead2
> [root@localhost /root]# mv /home/amead/L5/amead2 amead2.temp
> [root@localhost /root]# tar -xv -f /dev/st0 /home/amead/L5/amead2
> tar: /home/amead/L5/amead2: Not found in archive

Try with:  home/amead/L5/amead2, and see if that works.  

> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> [root@localhost /root]#
>  
> Hope I did not include too much info.  It would be helpful to know if

Better than too little (well, at least with text...).

> I'm doing the right thing and whether I should be using /dev/st0 or
> /dev/nst0 (doesn't seem to matter, both fail).  

The 'n' only indicates that it won't auto-rewind after each usage, IIRC.

--
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]        | the silly student          |
|--------------------------| he writes really bad haiku |
|   #include <stddiscl.h>  | readers all go mad         |

    


------------------------------

From: Julian Choquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X-windows on Voodoo3!!! HELP!!
Date: 15 Jun 1999 18:30:49 GMT

Hi, if you need the precise address here it is:
http://glide.xxedgexx.com/3DfxRPMS_vb_glibc.html

Have Fun
Julian Choquette

AK wrote:
> 
> On 12 May 1999 12:50:53 -0400, Greg Yantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I have used the X server on the page listed below with my Voodoo 3
> 3000 and it works. It took a lot of tweeking to get it to work well,
> however. I have also talked to people who couldn't get it to work at
> all on their system, and of course, it's not supported. But definitly
> give it a try.
> 
> Rumor has it that XFree86 will be including it with their next
> release. I should hope so, considering how popular it is for PC
> gaming.
> 
> AK
> 
> >fingers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> 
> >> Sekar wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I have a voodoo3 3000 AGP card in my machine. I recently installed
> >> > Redhat linux 6.0 on the system.
> >> 
> >> It's probably too new to be supported yet, I suspect you'll need to
wait
> >> for the new server (Check out www.xfree86.org)
> >
> >It is a little too new for XFree support. There is a beta server out
there,
> >though. I haven't tried it myself, so I can't comment on quality. The
> >URL is:
> >
> >     http://glide.xxedgexx.com/
> >
> >Look around, it's worth a read. There are now even RPM's available, for
> >those interested.
> >
> 


==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Burra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Zip 250: file system?
Date: 16 Jun 1999 02:30:51 GMT

I have gotten my Zip 250 parallel port to work but can't mount a zip disk.
I put it on auto but it says that I have to specify the filesystem type. I
do that but can't find one that works. What si the file syaytem of a pc
formated zip disk? Do I have a bigger underlying problem?? 
fstab:
/dev/hda5               /                       ext2    defaults        1 1
/dev/hda1               /boot                   ext2    defaults        1 2
/dev/hda6               swap                    swap    defaults        0 0
/dev/fd0                /mnt/floppy             msdos   rw,noauto,user  0 0
/dev/cdrom              /mnt/cdrom              auto    ro,noauto,user  0 0
/dev/zip                /mnt/zip                auto    rw,noauto,user  0 0
none                    /proc                   proc    defaults        0 0
none                    /dev/pts                devpts  mode=0622       0 0

dmesg:
scsi0 : Iomega VPI2 (imm) interface
scsi : 1 host.
  Vendor: IOMEGA    Model: ZIP 250           Rev: H.41
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 6, lun 0
SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 489532 [239 MB] [0.2 GB]
sda: Write Protect is off
 sda: sda4
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Can't find an ext2 filesystem on dev sd(8,0).
autofs: called with bogus options
VFS: Can't find an ext2 filesystem on dev sd(8,0).
VFS: Disk change detected on device sd(8,0)
SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 489532 [239 MB] [0.2 GB]
sda: Write Protect is off
 sda: sda4
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Disk change detected on device fd(2,0)
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Disk change detected on device sd(8,0)
SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 196608 [96 MB] [0.1 GB]
sda: Write Protect is off
 sda: sda4
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
UMSDOS: msdos_read_super failed, mount aborted.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
UMSDOS: msdos_read_super failed, mount aborted.
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
UMSDOS: msdos_read_super failed, mount aborted.
VFS: Can't find a HFS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12,FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0x6d,cs=768,#f=32,fs=37632,fl=423504,ds=13786368,de=8237,data=13786896,se=28
489,ts=1869182049,ls=8293,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
VFS: Can't find a valid MSDOS filesystem on dev 08:00.
UMSDOS: msdos_read_super failed, mount aborted.
registered device ppp0

I hope this is enough. Oh, and how do you get the imm driver module thingy
to auto load???
Thanks to whoever answers.

burra

==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: PD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: System Won't Turn Off
Date: 14 Jun 1999 16:30:45 GMT

hi all

i'm having a real turning off my computer.  i just finished installing
Debian, then i decided to shutdown the system (shutdown -h now) so i could
open the box.  the shutdown went fine it unmount all of my directories fine
and killed all the processes running but the machine was still running. 
now here's the crazy part.  when i pushed the power button the system
rebooted instead of turning off.  when i used to run windows98 the computer
turned off automatically when i do a shutdown.  is there a similar
capability with Linux?  i still have no idea why my power button doesn't
work. has anybody seen this this kind of thing before.  below is the
motherboard that i'm using.

MotherBoard: FIC PA-2013rev2.0  ATX

TIA
pd

==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Michael John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: help re: Logitech Mousman Wheel
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 03:42:00 GMT

Hi all, can anyone suggest to a new Linux user how to make my Logitech
Mouseman Wheel mouse use the wheel / third button? I'm using Caldera's
open linux 2.2, and 'lisa'  will not recognize the logitech. It will
however, work as a microsft serial mouse.

THanks!
Mike


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to