Linux-Hardware Digest #637, Volume #13 Wed, 27 Sep 00 11:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: CPUID and Athon T-Bird (John)
Re: Rage Fury Pro/Xpert 2000 Pro ("Adam Short")
second hard disk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: inetd[642]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use ("Vinson Armstead")
PCMCIA 3c575_cb module (Alan Scheinine)
Re: Unable to mount CD (as root) (Steve Bradley)
Re: ide-scsi emulation ("Gene Heskett")
getting user access to /dev/mem (ferdinand.cornelissen)
Re: second hard disk (Rootman)
Canon BJC-2100 (Ville Huuskonen)
Re: Fujifilm MX1200 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Keyboard works in single-user mode; not in multi-user ("Andrew P. Billyard")
Motherboards with 5+ ISA slots (Philip Juels)
Re: Belkin UPS model F6C525-SER & Linux (Steve Wampler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CPUID and Athon T-Bird
Date: 27 Sep 2000 17:57:47 +0800
Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't use NTFS, mainly because I couldn't read it when booted
> into Win9x. What's ext2?
A Linux native filesystem.
--
------------------------------
From: "Adam Short" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Rage Fury Pro/Xpert 2000 Pro
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:51:07 +0100
I've just bought this card myself but I haven't built the rest of the
machine its going in yet so I can't really give you the benefit of any
experience. There is however a website with information on configuring
Rage128 chipsets with X. Its at :
http://www.linuxnewbie.org/nhf/intel/hardware/ati_rage128.html
Don't know how much help it'll be but it might be worth a look.
Adam
Tudor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8qr0ac$cfs$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi!
>
> I have this video card with Rage128Pro chip, and I'm not able to set X. I
> use RH 6.2.
> Can anybody give me a solution? (I'm not very good in hard setings)
>
> -- Tudor
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install
Subject: second hard disk
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:21:11 GMT
hello all
i want to add second hard-disk to my existing redhat linux 6.2 harddisk.
this harddisk is having NTFS and FAT32 partitions
How can i add this second harddisk and mount it?
thanks in advance
newlinx
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "Vinson Armstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: inetd[642]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:48:35 GMT
That worked!
Thanks for the assistance
"Villy Kruse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On 25 Sep 2000 10:43:38 GMT, Jan Bredereke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> >Hi Vinson,
> >
> >On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:25:35 GMT, Vinson Armstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> I have been noticing a large number of the below message in my log
files. I
> >> am not sure but it seem that my system thinks there is another system
on the
> >> network with same IP address it has?!?!?!?!?
> >>
> >> "inetd[642]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use"
> >
> >No. This message of the "bind" system call means that another
> >process on the *same* machine has already grabbed the port in order
> >to listen to incoming requests. The TCP port appears to be auth,
> >i.e., 113 (see /etc/services). So the inetd process cannot bind to
> >it. Look for another process providing auth services. (Maybe it is
> >spawned by the inet daemon, too?)
> >
>
>
>
> Common problem when upgrading to RH6.1 or RH6.2. The identd is not
> started from /etc/rc.d, and if it is also enabled in /etc/inetd.conf
> you get the bind conflict. Disable it one of the places, probaly
> by commenting out identd in /etc/inetd.conf.
>
>
>
>
> Villy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Scheinine)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: PCMCIA 3c575_cb module
Date: 27 Sep 2000 13:22:52 GMT
Many people have asked during several months about why the driver for
the 3Com 575 Cardbus does not work well. The answer has been to install
pcmcia-cs-3.1.20, the latest version. I did an install and nothing
improved.
Automatically, the installation put the modules in
/lib/modules/preferred/pcmcia
I noticed that I also had a directory with a name that corresponded
to the actual kernel, with a subdirectory
/lib/modules/2.2.16/pcmcia
I removed the files in /lib/modules/2.2.16/pcmcia and copied into
that directory the files in /lib/modules/preferred/pcmcia
(which judging by the date were installed today).
The network problem was solved.
--
Alan Louis Scheinine, CRS4, Cagliari, Italy, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Steve Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Unable to mount CD (as root)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:17:57 GMT
MH wrote:
> I am unable to mount my CD (as root). I get the following error
> message:
>
> mount: /dev/cdrom has wrong major or minor number
Find out what device your CDROM is - you can watch the boot screen, or take
a look at /var/log/dmesg. It is probably something like hdb, hdc, hdd
(unless it's scsi). Once you know what it is:
(as root)
#rm -f /dev/cdrom
#ln -s /dev/xxx /dev/cdrom (where xxx is the correct cdrom device, eg hdc)
If you are using ide-scsi emulation, like I am, it's a little different -
the first cdrom detected will device scd0, so:
#ln-s /dev/scd0 /dev/cdrom
K?
--
Steve Bradley
Registered Linux User#187404
(register at www.linuxcounter.org)
ICQ#92564221
------------------------------
Date: 27 Sep 2000 9:5:22 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ide-scsi emulation
Unrot13 this;
Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Christopher E.;
CEM> Hats off to anyone who can actually read through this entire
CEM> message ...
CEM> I have recently attempted to burn CDs in Linux, and have had
CEM> success. However, along the way, I have seen a few troublesome
CEM> messages relating to the scsi emulation of my ATAPI CDRW (HP CD
CEM> Writer 9050, or equivalently, a SONY CD-RW CDRX140E).
CEM> First, I have ide-cd support compiled directly into the
CEM> Kernel
CEM> (RH 6.2, 2.2.5). As per the procedure outlined in the
That kernel is pretty prehistoric now, and there have been many fixes
since that one was fresh.
CEM> CD-Writing-HOWTO, I have added the line
CEM> append="hdc=ide-scsi"
CEM> to linux image section of /etc/lilo.conf, and ran lilo. This
CEM> should tell the ide-cd driver to ignore hdc, the cd-writer, so
CEM> it may be emulated as a scsi device later. My first question:
CEM> Should I change the append line to
CEM> append="hdc=ide-scsi hdd=ide-scsi"
CEM> to also emulate my ZIP drive as a scsi device? Does it make any
CEM> difference if the ZIP is emulated as SCSI or left in ATAPI mode?
CEM> Next, I have added the line
CEM> pre-install sg modprobe ide-scsi
CEM> to the /etc/conf.modules file so as to make sure the emulation
CEM> for the CDRW is loaded before the generic scsi driver is loaded.
CEM> Given that the scsi-cdrom driver (sr_mod) and the ide-cd driver
CEM> are compiled directly into the kernel, am I correct in saying
CEM> that the rest of the module configuration listed in the HOWTO is
CEM> not necessary?
CEM> options ide-cd ignore=hdc # tell
CEM> the
CEM> ide-cd module to ignore hdb
CEM> alias scd0 sr_mod # load
CEM> sr_mod
CEM> upon access of scd0
CEM> #pre-install ide-scsi modprobe imm #
CEM> uncomment
CEM> for some ZIP drives only
CEM> pre-install sr_mod modprobe ide-scsi # load
CEM> ide-scsi before sr_mod
CEM> pre-install ide-scsi modprobe ide-cd # load
CEM> ide-cd before ide-scsi
CEM> Without the lines immediately above, the configuration suffices
CEM> to load sg.o and ide-scsi.o automatically when I attempt to
CEM> access the scsi bus
CEM> (e.g. cdrecord --scanbus). However, even if I manually load the
CEM> drivers
CEM> (modprobe sg), I see some disturbing scsi messages:
>> cat /proc/scsi/scsi
CEM> Attached devices:
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
CEM> Vendor: IOMEGA Model: ZIP 100 Rev: 14.A
CEM> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision:
CEM> ffffffff
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 01
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 02
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 03
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 04
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 05
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 06
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
CEM> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 07
CEM> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
CEM> Type: CD-ROM
CEM> Why is the CD Writer appearing on all Logical Units? What are
CEM> SCSI Logical Units used for anyway? Note that this persists
CEM> even if I specify "max_scsi_luns=1" as a parameter to the kernel
CEM> (through a LILO append option). Is this an indication of a
CEM> problem? Has anyone seen this before? Also, why does the ZIP
CEM> drive appear here? Should it not still be an ATAPI device?
CEM> Then, in /var/log/messages, I see, in addition to the above:
This 'scan all luns' is a compile time option, or at least is on the
later kernels, if you do a make xconfig it should show up. Turn it off.
CEM> Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x
CEM> writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel:
CEM> sr1: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
CEM> Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sr2: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x
CEM> writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel:
CEM> sr3: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
CEM> Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sr4: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x
CEM> writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel:
CEM> sr5: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
CEM> Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sr6: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x
CEM> writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel:
CEM> sr7: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
This is the zip?
CEM> Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sda : READ CAPACITY failed. Sep
CEM> 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sda : status = 0, message = 00, host
CEM> =
CEM> 0, driver = 28
CEM> Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sda : extended sense code = 2
CEM> Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel: sda : block size assumed to be
CEM> 512 bytes, disk size 1GB. Sep 26 22:43:54 johnson kernel:
CEM> sda:scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0 Sep 26 22:43:54
CEM> johnson kernel: unable to read partition table
Might be because there wasn't a disk in it but I'm not an expert on
that.
CEM> This does not seem particularly healthy. Again, what do these
CEM> mean, and are they a problem? Despite all this nastiness, I am
CEM> able to write CDs perfectly well (using dev=0,1,0. Perhaps I am
CEM> too finicky?
CEM> Well, if you have read through to this point I appreciate your
CEM> efforts, and I would appreciate even more some information
CEM> regarding my queries.
I stay fairly current on kernels, currently running 2.2.18pre10. I have
an ACER 2x CDW/R burner that works great with the latest gnometoaster,
even with the re-writables. XCDRoast, while pretty, doesn't seem to
have all the functions for re-writeables yet.
Keeping current on kernels keeps my knowledge somewhat refreshed as each
rebuild seems to have its own rules. Like I had to put emu10k1 for my
SBLive in the 2.2.17 kernel before it would work, but had to make it a
module again for 2.2.18pre10. 2.2.18pre10 even has some USB support if
your mobo has those ports.
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040, Linux @ 400mhz
email gene underscore heskett at iolinc dot net
#Amiga based X10 home automation program EZHome, see at:#
# <http://www.thirdwave.net/~jimlucia/amigahomeauto> #
ISP's please take note: My spam control policy is explicit!
#Any Class C address# involved in spamming me is added to my killfile
never to be seen again. Message will be summarily deleted without dl.
This messages reply content, but not any previously quoted material, is
� 2000 by Gene Heskett, all rights reserved.
--
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:03:10 +0200
From: ferdinand.cornelissen
Subject: getting user access to /dev/mem
Dear gurus, ;)
I am working with a 'special' PCI device (excalibur milbus 1553 card)
which is inserted in my linux box. Because there's no driver for this
card on linux I have created a function which opens /dev/mem and then
maps the memory of this board onto a piece of memory in process space.
This way I can access the cards function and memory. This works fine
when running in root mode.
As I am using this function in a library which is being linked by
another program, I want to access /dev/mem being a 'normal' user
without root privilieges. Because /dev/mem is a 'char' device I have
set privileges on /dev/mem on rwx for everyone by running 'chmod 777
/dev/mem', with the idea that the normal user would be able to access
/dev/mem for reading and writing. Security is no issue, so it's dirty
but I don't mind. I do not have experience writing device drivers so I
think it will cost me some time writing one (even though most people
say that it's way easy, but having no experience usually means that it
takes a lot of time getting the job done).
However, whenever I try to access the library function which opens and
maps the memory of the board to the process space, I get an errno
indicating 'Operation not permitted'. How can this be?? I have set
privileges to everyone rwx??? Is there some extra check somewhere in
the kernel?? Can I disable this??
Please if someone has experience with this can you give me some
explanation or information on disabling the security??
Regards,
Ferdinand.
------------------------------
From: Rootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: second hard disk
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:47:46 GMT
Put it in making sure the jumpers are correctly configured. Next decide
what partition scheme you want to use. If you are simply storing data
on a stand alone machine there is really no reason to make both FAT32
and EXT2 partiions on it, Linux will read the FAT32 just fine - but will
NOT allow extended security attirbutes on it. Use Linux fdisk (or
gfdisk) and mkfs on it. You need to specify which disk it is (probably
/dev/hdb???) and the partition number when formatting with mkfs (maybe
/dev/hdb1 or hdb5???) - it all depends on which IDE channel you put it
on and where it sets in the IDE device chain.
If EXT2 is not important to you then simply fire up a DOS disk (floppy
or dual boot from the other disk if Windows lives there too). Run
DOS FDISK and partition it and then FORMAT it after a reboot with
FORMAT. Windows sees it automagically, Linux will have to mount it.
Create a directory where you would like to mount the drive, say /newdisk
. Regardless of what type you make it you the have to mount the disk,
use this comand: mount -t vfat /dev/hdb /newmount , the -t depends on
how you've formatted it, vfat=fat(32), use ext2 for ext2. the /dev/hd?
depends again on what channel it is running on and where it is on the
IDE device chain. If it then reads and writes good either edit
/etc/fstab manually (be carefull, make a backup), or use something like
linuxconf to add it to your system permanently.
GL & HF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello all
>
> i want to add second hard-disk to my existing redhat linux 6.2
harddisk.
> this harddisk is having NTFS and FAT32 partitions
> How can i add this second harddisk and mount it?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> newlinx
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ville Huuskonen)
Subject: Canon BJC-2100
Date: 27 Sep 2000 14:09:34 GMT
My printer doesn't work.
I did
#insmod parport
#insmod parport_pc io=0x3bc,0x378,0x278 irq=none,7,auto
#insmod parport_probe
and edited /etc/conf.modules
alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
options parport_pc io=0x378 irq=7
I have compiled
<M> Parallel port support
<M> PC-style hardware
<M> Parallel printer support
[*] Enable loadable module support
[*] Kernel module loader
My kernel is 2.2.12
System is unstable Debian i386
Printer is Canon BJC-2100
Thank you
--
Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fujifilm MX1200
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:27:32 GMT
Well I manage to figure it out myself after a talking to someone I knew.
It seems to work if I link /dev/fujifilm to /dev/cua* instead of the
corresponding /dev/ttyS*
Not sure why..
However the MX1200 does not seem to support the "shoot" commands". Am I
able to upgrade the software on the camera to get this functionality
In article <8qsak1$dr2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to get the Fujiplay utility to work with my MX1200 camera.
>
> I have set it up as described but when I call the fujiplay program is
> reports
>
> "The Camera Does Not Respond"
>
> Does anybody have any ideas what is happening?
>
> I am using Redhat 6.2 and the camera is connected to COM2
>
> TIA
>
> Jon Farmer
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "Andrew P. Billyard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Keyboard works in single-user mode; not in multi-user
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:02:13 GMT
==============E64AA746BE3770C37124FBAC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have no idea if this is an appropriate answer, but I had the same trouble
when I tried fooling around with my Kensington's Mouse-In-A-Box; its a PS/2
mouse, but I have it attached to the serial port as it doesn't work
otherwise. When I downloaded kernel 2.4 (test9-pre6), I tried setting up the
mouse again via the PS/2 port (with no avail). When /dev/mouse was linked to
/dev/psaux, my keyboard also froze up on the initial command login prompt.
As single user, I relinked it back to /dev/ttyS0 and the keyboard was usuable
again. Not sure what happened there....
Cheers,
Andrew
"Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
> Tom Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : When I boot up to the "LILO boot:" prompt, if I type in "linux", the
> : keyboard won't work when I get to the "login" prompt (booting into text
>
> : But, if I enter "linux single" at the "LILO boot:" prompt, the
> : keyboard DOES work, and I can log in normally. But can't do much.
>
> : What would cause this behavior?
>
> Some script executed in runlevels 2, 3 or 4. Try them and see.
>
> Peter
--
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============E64AA746BE3770C37124FBAC
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I have no idea if this is an appropriate answer, but I had the same trouble
when I tried fooling around with my Kensington's Mouse-In-A-Box; its a
PS/2 mouse, but I have it attached to the serial port as it doesn't
work otherwise. When I downloaded kernel 2.4 (test9-pre6), I tried
setting up the mouse again via the PS/2 port (with no avail). When
/dev/mouse was linked to /dev/psaux, my keyboard also froze up on the initial
command login prompt. As single user, I relinked it back to
/dev/ttyS0 and the keyboard was usuable again. Not sure what happened
there....
<p>Cheers,
<br>Andrew
<p>"Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Tom Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<br>: When I boot up to the "LILO boot:" prompt,
if I type in "linux", the
<br>: keyboard won't work when I get to the "login" prompt (booting into
text
<p>: But, if I enter "linux single" at the "LILO
boot:" prompt, the
<br>: keyboard DOES work, and I can log in normally. But can't do
much.
<p>: What would cause this behavior?
<p>Some script executed in runlevels 2, 3 or 4. Try them and see.
<p>Peter</blockquote>
<pre>--
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]</pre>
</html>
==============E64AA746BE3770C37124FBAC==
------------------------------
From: Philip Juels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Motherboards with 5+ ISA slots
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:06:01 GMT
Anyone know where I could find a Pentium style motherboard with 5 or
more ISA slots?
--Phil Juels
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Steve Wampler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Belkin UPS model F6C525-SER & Linux
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:52:06 -0700
David Steuber wrote:
>
> Steve Wampler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ' Try http://www.exploits.org/nut
> '
> ' Let me know if it works for you - I haven't had much luck with
> ' my FC6525 [with this or with the linux drivers supplied by
> ' belkin], but may have a cabling problem.
>
> I found it, but haven't had a chance to build it yet. Other stuff
> came up. Hopefully this week I will build it.
>
> What is the nature of your problem?
>
> I figure if I can't get it to work within the return period, I'll just
> take the thing back and get a UPS that powerd works with.
>
Turns out I had to change the 'nut' code (trivial to do) to connect at 1200
buad instead of 2400 (yes, I know that Belkin says the 525 uses 2400
baud - go figure...). Now it's working fine - I'm even logging
UPS info into a postgresql database (more for grins than anything
else). Use the 'belkin' model driver, not the trust-425+625 one.
The drivers supplied by Belkin for Linux still don't work, and behave
so strangely I've tossed them [no source means no fix, sigh].
I haven't (yet) unplugged my system to see if the powerfail shutdown
works or not. Soon...
--
Steve Wampler- SOLIS Project, National Solar Observatory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
