Linux-Hardware Digest #384, Volume #14 Thu, 22 Feb 01 21:13:06 EST
Contents:
Re: mt talkes loooong time? (John-Paul Stewart)
HP pavilion 4430 computer (Trouble with netgear FA310TX)
Re: Does Linux supports STAR SP300 printer? (B'ichela)
Re: Problem with Soundblaster PCI 128 ("s. eckloff")
unresolved symbol parport_* errors for zip drive ("Malcolm Carlson")
How-to- Linux on Unix?? (Mun Sing)
dual port server nic ??? any one (bluto)
Re: mounting udf cds as nonroot (Gregory Davis)
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? ("Net Llama!")
Gnome and fd0 ("Dennis J. Tuchler")
Cable modem and DHCP and MAC ("Hatem")
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? (Rob Windgassen)
Re: UDMA100 on VP6 ("Mediaone")
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? (Ron Wigmore)
Does RH 7.o support USB? Need it for HP scanner (Federico Bravo)
Re: Driver for Xerox WorkCentre 390 printer? (Mark Bratcher)
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? (Mark Bratcher)
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? (Someone Special)
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? ("Patrick Fisher")
Re: unresolved symbol parport_* errors for zip drive (Dances With Crows)
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? (Marcelo Rodrigues)
IRQ Line Assign ("Ajit Sodhi")
Re: How-to- Linux on Unix?? (Mark Bratcher)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John-Paul Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mt talkes loooong time?
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:16:37 GMT
Mark Bratcher wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I have a Seagate 10GB/20GB IDE (ATAPI) drive on
> RedHat Linux 6.2.
>
> I've been using it for backup and using the 'mt' command to
> please file or tape marks (using 'mt weof 1' to the tape)
>
> This basically works well, but one problem is that if
> I search for a file mark with 'mt fsf {n}' from the beginning
> of the tape to a mark that is about 7GB out it takes over
> 2 hours and causes a driver DSC timeout error.
>
> If the tape mark it searches for is not that far out, say 5GB,
> it works, but it still takes over 1.5 hours (less than 2hrs).
>
> Should mt really take this long? I could fix this by modifying
> the driver to increase the timeout, but I'm wondering if there
> is some other more fundamental problem happening.
>
I can't say whether or not it should take this long but I
have observed the exact same behaviour with my drive (also a
Seagate 20GB ATAPI unit). It is my understanding that this
is normal behaviour for Travan drives. There nowhere near
as quick as some of the more expensive tape drives.
HTH,
J-P Stewart
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HP pavilion 4430 computer (Trouble with netgear FA310TX)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:30:09 -0000
Hi i hope someone has had this problem before. I have a HP pavilion 4430
computer and im trying to install a netgear fa310tx network card in this
system. Its running linux (Redhat 7.0) Im pretty new at linux and i looked
around at some other sites for an answer. When linux is starting up it
doesnt find the card when checking for new hardware. Any tips or helpful
guide to do this would be greatly appricated. I thought this was a very
easy card to install i guess not. :) Thxs
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B'ichela)
Subject: Re: Does Linux supports STAR SP300 printer?
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:00:06 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:01:06 GMT, Afonso Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does Linux supports serial printer?
>It is Star SP300 for POS receipt printing.
>
>Afonso Sam
Linux does support Serial printers! read the printing-HOWTO as
well as the serial-howtos (might as well read all of the serial ones
and the printer ones. I got my Digital Equipment Letterwriter 100 to
work just fine with a slight modification to /etc/printcap (there is a
sample serial printer there. Modify this to reflect your real
baudrates, Flowcontrol, parity and stop bits.
the Printing-HOWTO mentions how to set this up. Now as for
WHAT software to drive your actual hardware? If this printer is
ascii (dot matrix) and you only want text the regular lpf filter is
all you need. If you want graphics.... you are on your own there!
--
B'ichela
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:18:25 +0100
From: "s. eckloff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Soundblaster PCI 128
>
> A colleague of mine had the same problem. He is using SuSE 7, and found
> this on Suse support site.
> <http://support.suse.de/sdb/de/html/swgkern_ensoniq5880.html> It is in
> german.
>
> I think that the new alsa drivers work with this soundchip.
>
> Janez Trenz
i dared to install it as if it were an ensoniq 1371, just for curiosity.
to my great delight it worked fine, as my _'real 1373' (also installed
as 1371) does.
just give this a try...
by the way: I installed it by hand, i.e. I modified modules.conf using
an editor.
yours siggi
--
siegfried eckloff (siggi red head), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
------------------------------
From: "Malcolm Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: unresolved symbol parport_* errors for zip drive
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:41:31 -0600
I am having trouble getting my zip 100 parallel drive working on my linux
box. Here are the error messages I get when running
insmod ppa:
insmod ppa
Using /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o: unresolved symbol
parport_unregister_device_Rsmpd56ae712
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o: unresolved symbol
parport_claim_Rsmpc9469e20
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o: unresolved symbol
parport_release_Rsmp5525734a
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o: unresolved symbol
parport_enumerate_Rsmpe33f5670
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o: unresolved symbol
parport_register_device_Rsmp73eaeca7
Anybody have any ideas?
------------------------------
From: Mun Sing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:09:09 -0800
Hi,
I am new to Linux.... and I am wondering if it is possible Linux on a
Unix System??
I know it does not make much of a scene... but this question just pop
into my head...
If anyone has tried it or have some knowledge of it.
Thanx,
Mun
------------------------------
From: bluto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dual port server nic ??? any one
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:19:29 GMT
any body have any experience with th intel pro 100+ dual port server
nic?
can you load balance?
any help appreciated..
tim
------------------------------
From: Gregory Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: mounting udf cds as nonroot
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:28:38 -0500
Matt Haley wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:05:03 -0500,
> Gregory Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I made a post a few weeks ago (maybe) about not being able to mount a
> >udf disk as a user. I thought the solution lay in upgrading my version
> >of utils-linux to the version required by kernel 2.4.1, i upgraded that
> >and still no dice. This is the output directly from console (no kde gui
> >or anything):
>
> Since you've already been told why you can't do it. Here's what you can
> do:
>
> mkdir /mnt/cdrom_udf
>
> Add to /etc/fstab:
>
> /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom_udf udf ro,users,noauto,exec 0 0
>
> That way you can 'mount /mnt/cdrom_udf' as a user.
>
> --
> Matt Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mandrake 7.2 / RedHat 6.1 / Windows 98 SE / FreeBSD 4.2 / Windows NT 4
Thank you so much!!!
I made a variation for the sake of not confusing myself. /dev/cdrom and
/dev/cdrom1 were sym links to /dev/hdd and /dev/sr0. So I created another
set of symlinks to /dev/hdd and /dev/sr0 named /dev/udf_cdrom and
/dev/udf_cdrom1. I then made different mount directories for them (like you
said), and put in unique entries in fstab (like you said). Now I can mount
either an iso cd or a udf cd in the same drive as a user! Still, I don't
know why the auto entry in fstab doesn't find udf. Maybe this is something
that needs to be addressed in the next version of mount. dunno.
Greg
------------------------------
From: "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:58:24 -0500
I don't quite understand what you're asking. Are you inquiring on
whether you can run Linux on top of Unix? AFAIK, that isn't an option,
but i could be wrong. I do wonder why you'd want to do such a thing
though.
Mun Sing wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Linux.... and I am wondering if it is possible Linux on a
> Unix System??
> I know it does not make much of a scene... but this question just pop
> into my head...
> If anyone has tried it or have some knowledge of it.
>
> Thanx,
> Mun
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera & Linux help http://netllama.ipfox.com
------------------------------
From: "Dennis J. Tuchler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Gnome and fd0
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:07:09 GMT
I use Gnome under SuSE 7.0
My floppy drive is an LS102 but it reads and writes to FAT-formatted
floppies. With a floppy diskette in the drive, I clicked on the floppy
drive icon on the Gnome desktop and got nothing. There was not even a
glimmering of a light under the floppy drive. Is there something I can
check to fix this?
Thanks for your time
dj tuchler
------------------------------
From: "Hatem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cable modem and DHCP and MAC
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:29:47 GMT
Hi all,
Everyone knows that cable modem companies are dhcp complient but at the end
you can use the given IP and treate it as a fixed IP address.
I have two computers, the first one has windows and linux (dual boot) and I
configured its network cards on both operating systems and everything works
just perfect!
Now there is another computer (firegate), and I need to make it my
gateway/firewall/proxy linux server, and I had two net cards in it, I tried
the net cards and tested their operability and they are both working
excellent.
Now on this Firegate computer the first card ifcfg-eth0 need to be connected
to the internet (cable modem)..
Bill helped me to setup the proper network and IP addresses (thanks Bill)
but I still could not get the connection to the internet working, I tried to
ping www.sybase.com and www.oracle.com and even www.microsoft.com and here
what happens:
1) the send and recieve lights on the cable modem are blinking on a rythem,
that the packets are sent and recieved..
2) I do not recieve a successful ping result on my computer screen.
What I am suspecting, is that the cable modem whcih is (TERAYON) has lost
the MAC address that it recognized first (which is on the other computer)
,,,
So is my guess correct?
if no please help me!
second thing, is there a way to re-register a new MAC on the cable modem?
without the use of DHCP or DHCP is a must in this case??
At the end, I really would like to thank all the people who helped me to
have my beautiful linux up and running!!
------------------------------
From: Rob Windgassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:24:42 +0100
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Mun Sing wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am new to Linux.... and I am wondering if it is possible Linux on a
>Unix System??
Eh, what is the definition of a unix system (and a linux system :-)) ?
Unix and linux are operating systems that run on a hardware platform, i.e.
NOT on another operating system.
For example:
- Linux can run on Intel machines (x86)
- Windows can run on intel machines too
- But, Linux does not 'run on' Windows; and Windows does not 'run on' Linux
and
- Solaris runs on Sparc machines
- Linux can run on Sparc machines
and
- Linux can run on PowerPC machines
etc etc
>I know it does not make much of a scene... but this question just pop
>into my head...
It 's the wrong question, I guess.
--
Rob Windgassen
If a man has talent and cannot use it, he has failed.
-- Thomas Wolfe
------------------------------
From: "Mediaone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit
Subject: Re: UDMA100 on VP6
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:53:05 GMT
Where did you get this statement? Both the HPT (IDE 3&4) and the VIA (IDE
1&2) chips support ATA100. I am seeing it with my very own eyes.
"larry weimar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:kNbl6.40650$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> only ide 3 and 4 support ata 100
> ide 1and 2 support up to 66
> "Hamish Marson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > Are all IDE interfaces on the VP6 capable of UDMA100? Or are some more
> > equal than others? I currently have a 30GB IBM 75GXP attached as master
> > on ide0, and am seeing 24MB/sec read (measured by hdparm -t /dev/hda on
> > Linux Redhat 6.2, kernel 2.4.1).
> >
> > DMA mode was set using hdparm -X65 /dev/hda, which I believe is udma-2
> > (?)
> >
> > Question is, should I be seeing more throughput than that? And what
> > should be the preferred setting for hdparm on this drive, kernel & MB
> > combination?
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: Ron Wigmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:05:56 GMT
Do you mean running both at the same time?
Closest to what you may be asking for is "vmware". It'll let you run
multiple Intel based O/S's concurrently. eg. Windows and Linux or
Caldera Linux and Turbolinux - you could even create a whole network of
virtual Linux's running on a single PC (if your hardware was powerful
enough) to simulate your real network configuration.
The software for UNIX like Solaris and AIX will not run on Intel
(hardware) systems.
Mun Sing wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Linux.... and I am wondering if it is possible Linux on a
> Unix System??
> I know it does not make much of a scene... but this question just pop
> into my head...
> If anyone has tried it or have some knowledge of it.
>
> Thanx,
> Mun
------------------------------
From: Federico Bravo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Does RH 7.o support USB? Need it for HP scanner
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:06:39 GMT
I have a HP ScanJet 3400C with USB interface. I would like to try and
use it with SANE but I get a 'no device available' kind-of message. Is
that maybe because kernel 2.2.16-22 doesn' actually support USB? Any
comment on this ( and on install an USB scanner onto Linux ) will be
very appreciated.
I've looked around a bit and it seems to me there's very little
information around about scanners for Linux. Please help.
Thank you. Federico.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Bratcher)
Subject: Re: Driver for Xerox WorkCentre 390 printer?
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:17:08 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Woinoski wrote:
>Does anyone have a driver for a Xerox WorkCentre 390 printer (laser
>printer/scanner/fax)? Xerox says it's a GDI printer (huh?) and they
>don't have a linux driver for it.
>
If it's a "GDI printer" that means it is specific to Windows :-(
(GDI = "Graphics Device Interface" which is the programming interface
used in Windows for talking to graphics devices).
You could check www.linuxprinting.org to see if they have any
suggestions for it.
--
Mark Bratcher
To reply direct, remove both underscores (_) from my email name
===============================================================
Escape from Microsoft's proprietary tentacles: use Linux!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Bratcher)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:20:15 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Windgassen wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Mun Sing wrote:
>
>Unix and linux are operating systems that run on a hardware platform, i.e.
>NOT on another operating system.
>
>For example:
>- Linux can run on Intel machines (x86)
>- Windows can run on intel machines too
And Windows can run on Linux. (eg, Lin4win) :-)
And Windows 3.11 can run on OS/2.
--
Mark Bratcher
To reply direct, remove both underscores (_) from my email name
===============================================================
Escape from Microsoft's proprietary tentacles: use Linux!
------------------------------
From: Someone Special <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:43:00 GMT
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:20:15 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark
Bratcher) wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Windgassen wrote:
>>On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Mun Sing wrote:
>>
>>Unix and linux are operating systems that run on a hardware platform, i.e.
>>NOT on another operating system.
>>
>>For example:
>>- Linux can run on Intel machines (x86)
>>- Windows can run on intel machines too
>
>And Windows can run on Linux. (eg, Lin4win) :-)
>And Windows 3.11 can run on OS/2.
Nope, Windows can't run on Linux, there are programs and
libraries that emulate the Win32/Win16 API's so that you can run
Windows software in Linux, but you can't run Windows itself. Keep in
mind, that even if you were to run explorer.exe and get the /real/
Windows interface, desktop and all, that you're still not running
Windows.
Same thing with OS/2, it supported Win16 software and even
some Win16 device drivers, but it couldn't actually run Windows in one
of it's Windows.
------------------------------
From: "Patrick Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:10:45 -0500
"Someone Special" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Nope, Windows can't run on Linux, there are programs and
> libraries that emulate the Win32/Win16 API's so that you can run
> Windows software in Linux, but you can't run Windows itself.
http://www.vmware.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: unresolved symbol parport_* errors for zip drive
Date: 23 Feb 2001 01:11:31 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:41:31 -0600, Malcolm Carlson staggered into the
Black Sun and said:
>I am having trouble getting my zip 100 parallel drive working on my
>linux box. Here are the error messages I get when running insmod ppa:
>
>insmod ppa
>Using /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o
>/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0smp/scsi/ppa.o: unresolved symbol
>parport_unregister_device_Rsmpd56ae712
[snip]
>Anybody have any ideas?
Use "modprobe" instead of "insmod" for general use. insmod is useful
mainly for giving you errors like that. If you do "modprobe ppa",
modprobe queries the /lib/modules/$KERNELVERSION/modules.dep file, finds
the modules that ppa depends on, and loads them in the right order
if they're not already loaded. insmod will do no such thing. The
correct sequence for manually insmodding ppa stuff is like so:
insmod parport
insmod parport_pc (sub appropriately if you have a PPC/Sparc...)
insmod lp
insmod ppa
Also, remember that only older parallel ZIPs use ppa. Newer ones use
imm. HTH,
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
http://www.brainbench.com / Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
=============================/ I hit a seg fault....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED](Marcelo Rodrigues)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: 23 Feb 2001 01:11:47 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED](Marcelo Rodrigues)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Someone Special wrote
> Nope, Windows can't run on Linux, there are programs and
> libraries that emulate the Win32/Win16 API's so that you can run
> Windows software in Linux, but you can't run Windows itself. Keep in
> mind, that even if you were to run explorer.exe and get the /real/
> Windows interface, desktop and all, that you're still not running
> Windows.
> Same thing with OS/2, it supported Win16 software and even
> some Win16 device drivers, but it couldn't actually run Windows in one
> of it's Windows.
>
I think you are misleading on the last paragraph if interpreted broadly.
With OS/2 you could indeed run Windows ( the version current at the time )
on one of the OS/2 windows. You could choose to have the desktop appear on
that window or to have each Windows app put up its own OS/2 window. It is
true
however that insofar as you were running Windows under the OS/2 environment
you were not in fact running Windows. There were, at the time of
introduction,
only a handful of apps designed for Windows that could not be made to
function
properly on OS/2 with Windows.
--
"NeXTMail" OK at this address only.
------------------------------
From: "Ajit Sodhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.development.system,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.embedded,linux.redhat.devel
Subject: IRQ Line Assign
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:13:36 GMT
As you can see, that I'm a novice in linux drivers. Here is another problem
I have.
I'm trying to set up the interrupt handler for this PCI to PCI bridde
driver. (any reference for such a driver will be very useful).
When I try to call request_irq with SA_INTRRRUPT or NULL flag the
request_irq fails. I noticed from /proc/interrupts file that the requested
intr is used by my network card.
When I try to use SA_SHIRQ flag it works, but now I get too many calls fro
my handler. Is there a way I can distinguish between intr from my card or
not.
I'm also looking for other options. How can I use a different IRQ line. Is
it possible? (if yes how). FYI, I'm using the IRQ line available in the
pci_dev struct.
Hope to get some response!
Thanks
Ajit
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Bratcher)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How-to- Linux on Unix??
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:48:34 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Someone Special wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:20:15 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark
>Bratcher) wrote:
>
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Windgassen wrote:
>>>On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Mun Sing wrote:
>>>
>>>Unix and linux are operating systems that run on a hardware platform, i.e.
>>>NOT on another operating system.
>>>
>>>For example:
>>>- Linux can run on Intel machines (x86)
>>>- Windows can run on intel machines too
>>
>>And Windows can run on Linux. (eg, Lin4win) :-)
>>And Windows 3.11 can run on OS/2.
>
>
> Nope, Windows can't run on Linux, there are programs and
>libraries that emulate the Win32/Win16 API's so that you can run
>Windows software in Linux, but you can't run Windows itself. Keep in
>mind, that even if you were to run explorer.exe and get the /real/
>Windows interface, desktop and all, that you're still not running
>Windows.
Well, that's what I meant. Windows of course does not run directly on it,
but you can get a library to do it for you. It's all just software.
> Same thing with OS/2, it supported Win16 software and even
>some Win16 device drivers, but it couldn't actually run Windows in one
>of it's Windows.
Ditto my above comment.
--
Mark Bratcher
To reply direct, remove both underscores (_) from my email name
===============================================================
Escape from Microsoft's proprietary tentacles: use Linux!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.hardware.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
