Linux-Hardware Digest #468, Volume #14 Sun, 11 Mar 01 20:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Q: Epson Stylus Color 680 (Phillip Deackes)
Changing monitor ("bmeson")
Re: Changing monitor (Lou Boyd)
Re: SCSI-III IBM harddisk at Adaptec 2940UW (Matthias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?=)
Re: SCSI-III IBM harddisk at Adaptec 2940UW (Matthias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?=)
Savage4 and XFree at 60Hz only? (Marc Bartsch)
changing refresh rate ("Kevin")
Re: Savage4 and XFree at 60Hz only? (Marc Bartsch)
Re: 2.4.2 vs Adaptec 7896 (Konstantinos Agouros)
Re: Question: setup cable modem, Linux and Windows (Mr. Bigglesworth)
Disk geometry ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: changing refresh rate (Dances With Crows)
Re: xplaymidi vs. AC97 V2.1 CODEC Compliant (David Efflandt)
Re: Question: setup cable modem, Linux and Windows
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Looking for a relatively cheap multi purpose development board (Bard_64)
cannot mount new SCSI cd-burner scd0 (Darren and Marla Welson)
Re: cannot mount new SCSI cd-burner scd0 (Bora Ugurlu)
Re: Linux on an HP Kayak xw model D6488n,6/400 series W3 ("ryb")
Dual HDD question ("Timur Insepov")
Re: cannot mount new SCSI cd-burner scd0 (Dances With Crows)
Re: Disk geometry (Dances With Crows)
any experience with cobalt? (reader of news)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phillip Deackes)
Subject: Re: Q: Epson Stylus Color 680
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:44:29 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Javier Conti wrote:
>Hi, does anyone here has a fully working Epson Stylus Color 680?
>Mine works but when I try to use the 670 driver (from the gimp) to use
>720x720 dpi it prints a very blurred image.
>
>Is someone aware of a 680 specific filter? or a driver for the gimp?
Yes!!!! Epson themselves have written a Linux driver for several of
their Stylus printers. The output quality is equal to that from the
Windows driver. I also comes with a gui utility for setting up paper
quality, resolution etc..
I have a 680 and have never before seen such good colour printing from a
Linux box. I am bowled over by it!
The driver is obtainable from
http://www.epkowa.co.jp/english/pro_e/pips_e.html. There is a readme on
the download page which explains how to set it up.
--
Phillip Deackes
Using Progeny Debian Linux
------------------------------
From: "bmeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Changing monitor
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:06:48 -0500
Hi, I plan to change the monitor on the Linux box (downgrading from 19'' to
17''). But I'll keep the same video card (matrox m400). What is the
re-configuration I need to do? I don't want to re-run the redhat
installation unless no other options.
Thanks,
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:11:38 +0000
From: Lou Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Changing monitor
bmeson wrote:
>
> Hi, I plan to change the monitor on the Linux box (downgrading from 19'' to
> 17''). But I'll keep the same video card (matrox m400). What is the
> re-configuration I need to do? I don't want to re-run the redhat
> installation unless no other options.
Run Xconfigurator. You can generally change monitors with no
reconfiguration unless the new monitor has a restricted scan rate.
--
Lou Boyd
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: Matthias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SCSI-III IBM harddisk at Adaptec 2940UW
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:52:23 +0100
Tom Gafford wrote:
>> I have connected an IBM SCSI-III harddisk (DDYS-T18350N) to an Adaptec
>> 2940UW adapter on the wide channel. At the moment for testing the
>> harddisk it is the only device at the adapter (accept an active terminator).
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> Other devices (two harddisks, a CD-ROM drive, a tape-drive) on the
>> narrow channel are working fine.
>>
>> Windows NT 4 is also installed is working correct with the IBM harddisk.
>>
>
> <snip>
> The 2940UW, as opposed to the U2W, has a single segment SCSI bus. This means
> that the cabling for ALL your devices is one big electrical circuit. If the
> Linux driver tries to run a transfer at the top UW speed, the fast bus
> signals are going out over the (usually longer and poorer at high speed
> signal handling) narrow cabling as well, and this can produce a lot of
> problems. You are far better off upgrading to a 2940U2W or 29160 if you
> want to run this mix of peripherals. Alternatively, (and a bit cheaper),
> you can get a 2930 to run the narrow guys (assuming you don't need CD boot),
> and dedicate the 2940 to your IBM. I have a U2W with the same drive you
> have, on its separate LVD segment, and it works great. As to termination,
> you need an external wide single ended (active, of course) terminator at the
> IBM drive, and an external active terminator at the last narrow device
> (unless it has a built-in active terminator -- if it has resistor packs,
> remove them and go external) and you have to make absolutely sure that
> termination in the controller and all the other devices is turned OFF,
> except for the controller-resident high byte terminator, which should be
> forced ON (settable in the ctrl-A menu the controller displays at startup).
> You could also try to limit the transfer speed of the IBM drive in the
> adaptec setup so that it doesn't transfer fast and cause trouble on the
> narrow bus. But first make sure your termination is right. When termination
> is wrong, it produces all kinds of black magic including working on one OS
> and not another, working with a long cable but not a short one, etc.
Thanks for your help!
Matthias
------------------------------
From: Matthias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SCSI-III IBM harddisk at Adaptec 2940UW
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:50:43 +0100
Hi Joshua,
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> Matthias Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> That's an LVD hard drive, and you've got it on an SE chain. That *can*
> work (but you're taking a massive speed hit on the hard drive). Make sure
> that you've got the right type of terminator.
>
I know about that I will not get the full speed on the harddisk. I just
need the disk space, but not the full speed and I don't want to spend
much money for a new controller.
What type of terminator do I need? I bought a 68-pin active terminator
for internal use. It seems to be the only one that was offered by my
supplier and right for my cause.
>
>> I have tested every parameter in the Adaptec BIOS and every jumper at
>> the harddisk. I tried a new SCSI cable, but nothing solves the problem.
>
>
> Have you tried jumpering the "Force SE mode" pin on the drive? How long
> is your total (intenal + external) chain? What color was the goat?
I've also tried the jumper for "Force SE mode" on the harddisk.
For testing at the moment the IBM drive is the only device connected to
the controller. In the future I want to use 4 other devices (two
harddisks, one tape drive and one cd drive) on the narrow channel!
In another newsgroup I got the tip that updating to kernel version
2.2.16 with a newer aic7xxx driver solved the problem in similar cause!
I will try this first.
Thanks for your help.
Matthias
------------------------------
From: Marc Bartsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Savage4 and XFree at 60Hz only?
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:57:20 +0100
Hi there,
For a few days now, I am trying to configure my XServer so that my
monitor uses a frequency of 75Hz but the only
frequency I get is 60Hz which is annyoing to work with. Some data about
my system: I uses a Creative (S3) Savage4 (32MB), Suse 7.1 and
XFree4.02. The funny thing is that XFine2 for example tells me that is
uses 75Hz, but my On Screen Display shows only 60Hz. I tried different
modelines, but they wouldn't work either.
If I look at the Xfree log file, I see that it chooses a 60Hz mode,
because it cannot find any other
Here it finds some modes:
(--) SAVAGE(0): Found 15 modes at this depth:
[10e] 320 x 200, 70Hz
[133] 320 x 240, 72Hz
[143] 400 x 300, 72Hz
[153] 512 x 384, 70Hz
[11d] 640 x 400, 70Hz
[111] 640 x 480, 60Hz
[173] 720 x 480, 75Hz
[17e] 720 x 576, 75Hz
[114] 800 x 600, 60Hz, 56Hz
[117] 1024 x 768, 60Hz
[163] 1152 x 864, 60Hz
[11a] 1280 x 1024, 60Hz
[122] 1600 x 1200, 60Hz
[148] 1920 x 1200, 60Hz
[138] 1920 x 1440, 60Hz
(--) SAVAGE(0): Virtual size is 800x600 (pitch 800)
(**) SAVAGE(0): Mode "800x600": 68.6 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 66.0
kHz, 105.4 Hz
(==) SAVAGE(0): DPI set to (75, 75)
And further down it takes mode 114:
(--) SAVAGE(0): mapping framebuffer @ 0xd0000000 with size 0x2000000
(==) SAVAGE(0): Write-combining range (0xd0000000,0x2000000)
(--) SAVAGE(0): Chose mode 114 at 60Hz.
Why does the Server always choose this mode and cannot find another
mode? Is there a restriction on the card.
I also tried different monitors, but none would give a better
resolution.
Thanks a lot if someone can help me,
Marc.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: changing refresh rate
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:56:54 GMT
I'm running RedHat 6.2 and would like to know how I can change my
refresh rate to the display from to higher seting than 60mhz on a 15
inch monitor
--
kd
------------------------------
From: Marc Bartsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Savage4 and XFree at 60Hz only?
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:05:11 +0100
Hi there,
Just to add: The vertical and horizontal refresh rates in my XF86Config
file are high enough. Something around
40-90Khz and 50-150Hz. They should not be the problem.
Thanks,
Marc.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konstantinos Agouros)
Subject: Re: 2.4.2 vs Adaptec 7896
Date: 11 Mar 2001 21:38:50 +0100
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Markus Kossmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> and reset loop. Booting 2.2.16 again I had no problems. Is this a known
>> issue?
>Yes. Try the new "Gibbs" driver instead. It's in 2.4.3pre3 or you can
>find patches at http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gibbs/linux/
If it will be in 2.4.3 I think I can wait \:)
Will there be an additional driver for these Controler, the existing one patched
or the existing one replaced?
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Otkerstr. 28, 81547 Muenchen, Germany. Tel +49 89 69370185
============================================================================
"Captain, this ship will not sustain the forming of the cosmos." B'Elana Torres
------------------------------
From: Mr. Bigglesworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Question: setup cable modem, Linux and Windows
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:30:05 -0000
Here's how I did mine, it all just sort of fell together. I have an
external cable modem. The cable modem feeds into my hub...the hub feeds
to 2 of my workstations via NIC. Just configure your nic's tcp-ip
settings in linux as you would in windows and you should be in biz.
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Disk geometry
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:38:51 +0100
Hello all,
My disk values are these (Maxtor DiamondMax Plus):
Cylinders - 59554
Heads - 16 <---
Sectors - 63
Size - 29312
Platters - 3
Heads per surface - 1
If my drive has 3 platters and a surface has one head, why the "Heads"
value is 16? I suppose they are different concepts... or not?
How is the "Heads" value calculated?
Thanks.
---
Fernando.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: changing refresh rate
Date: 11 Mar 2001 21:42:54 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:56:54 GMT, Kevin staggered into the Black Sun and
said:
>I'm running RedHat 6.2 and would like to know how I can change my
>refresh rate to the display from to higher seting than 60mhz on a 15
>inch monitor
Re-run XConfigurator, and tell it the HSync and VSync ranges your
monitor supports. That data should be in the manual for your monitor,
or you can go to the manufacturer's website and check out the tech
specs. Alternatively, within XConfigurator, pick the preset option
"Monitor that can do 1024x768@75Hz". (At least that's what I think it
is; I haven't used XConfigurator in many months.) HTH,
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
http://www.brainbench.com / Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
=============================/ I hit a seg fault....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: xplaymidi vs. AC97 V2.1 CODEC Compliant
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:06:04 GMT, Young4ert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>My Linux system is composed of an Asus K7M mobo with an AMD Athlon CPU and
>it is setup with SuSE-.70 Pro Linux distro. The audio hardware system is
>based on the Analog Device 3D sound chipset (I believe the chipset is
>AD1881) and it is an AC97 V2.1 CODEC compliant. I also have installed
>rosegarden-2.1pl2 software and I would like to be able to play the midi
>file while I am using the rosegarden to create/type in the notes. I
>realized that the rosegarden software requires xplaymidi and my Linux
>system does not seem to have installed a copy of playmidi software. A
>search through SuSE' FTP site yielded nothing about playmidi source code.
>Then, I found a copy of the playmidi-2.4.src.rpm source off the
>ftp.redhat.com site and just downloaded, compiled, and installed playmidi
>package. It looked just fine; however, when I tried to manually play a
>midi song using xplaymidi, it complained "could not find the midi device"
Not sure what if anything SuSE provides to play midi. I just installed
SuSE 7.1 on my laptop and apropos midi only show timidity (no players).
Some midi devices are not supported unless you use something like
'timidity' for software wave tables. But before you go to that trouble,
try using the -f switch for playmidi [plays through FM (aka, OPL3)].
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question: setup cable modem, Linux and Windows
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.misc
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:31:12 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc bmeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have a Linux and a Windows PC. I need to connect them together and to
> the cable modem. I also want the outside world be able see my Linux machine
> (I want to setup Linux as webserver, ftp and telnet, etc.) I'm thinking
> buying a hub for this task.
> So what is the proper connection? is it
> cable modem --- Linux --- Hub --- Windows
> or
> cable modem --- Hub --- Linux
> |
> ------ Windows
> Or should I use something other than hub?
> Thanks.
I would strongly suggest you connect the linux box to the modem, then
another NIC in the linux box to the hub, then to the win machine...
TW being the way they are about multiple machines sharing the cable
connection... :-)
BTW - there is a LUG forming in Ithaca - check the latest Pennysaver
for the tel. # of the person starting this up. I don't have a
copy on hand, or I'd let you know... (I live in Trumansburg, so
if you want, send me e-mail (take out the NO-SPAM) and I can call
and talk this over or even come and help out if needed....)
Kris
------------------------------
From: Bard_64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Looking for a relatively cheap multi purpose development board
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:26:02 +0000
Hello
I'm looking for a relatively cheap multi purpose development board,
capable of supporting embedded linux or something similar.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank you
Daniel
------------------------------
From: Darren and Marla Welson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux
Subject: cannot mount new SCSI cd-burner scd0
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:42:41 GMT
I have added a SCSI CD-R to my system, but I cannot mount it because the
device, /dev/scd0, has no module (?) and cannot be mounted. I am not
sure what else to do, since the OS is installed on a HD on the same SCSI
card--so I know it works. I do not know what else to try.
Darren
------------------------------
From: Bora Ugurlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: cannot mount new SCSI cd-burner scd0
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:49:34 +0100
Darren and Marla Welson wrote:
> I have added a SCSI CD-R to my system, but I cannot mount it because the
> device, /dev/scd0, has no module (?) and cannot be mounted. I am not
> sure what else to do, since the OS is installed on a HD on the same SCSI
> card--so I know it works. I do not know what else to try.
>
> Darren
>
>
You need the SCSI CDROM support in the kernel to use /dev/scdx devices.
Whereas, you can use sg0 instead od scd0 (or was it sr0?)
Check SCSI-howto's, it's the best..
Bora
--
------------------------------
From: "ryb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux on an HP Kayak xw model D6488n,6/400 series W3
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:39:29 GMT
In regards to NT Professional 2000 BEING on the pc before putting Linux,no
can do on my part as I have NTFS files only and cannot create raw diskettes
from that pc(Kayak)by just have a cd-rom with no booting
diskettes.Nevertheless will tey to get hold of slackware or Red hat as Turbo
Linux/Mandrake are dead end for me-they do NOT recognize the AIC 7880 BIOS
on the HP Kayak xw !
------------------------------
From: "Timur Insepov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dual HDD question
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:52:32 GMT
Hi,
I have two HDDs in my box. One is a 28GB which is used only by Windows and
9GB which is used solely by Linux Redhat 7.0. Everything works out fine, but
in Windows, I can't see the 9GB HDD and in Linux, I can't see 28GB hdd. Is
there anyway to have them recognize each other.
Best regards,
Timur
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: cannot mount new SCSI cd-burner scd0
Date: 12 Mar 2001 01:00:51 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:49:34 +0100, Bora Ugurlu staggered into the Black
Sun and said:
>Darren and Marla Welson wrote:
>
>> I have added a SCSI CD-R to my system, but I cannot mount it because the
>> device, /dev/scd0, has no module (?) and cannot be mounted. I am not
>> sure what else to do, since the OS is installed on a HD on the same SCSI
>> card--so I know it works. I do not know what else to try.
>
>You need the SCSI CDROM support in the kernel to use /dev/scdx devices.
>Whereas, you can use sg0 instead od scd0 (or was it sr0?)
>Check SCSI-howto's, it's the best..
Not necessarily in the kernel. "modprobe sr_mod" and you should be able
to access /dev/scd0 as a normal CD-ROM; "modprobe sg" and you should be
able to write CDs using cdrecord or one of its many front-ends like
XCDRoast. All distributions ship with the sr_mod and sg modules
included. If you compiled a custom kernel, you may need to rebuild
those two modules, but you shouldn't have to reboot to use them! HTH,
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
http://www.brainbench.com / Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
=============================/ I hit a seg fault....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: Disk geometry
Date: 12 Mar 2001 01:00:58 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:38:51 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] staggered into the Black
Sun and said:
>My disk values are these (Maxtor DiamondMax Plus):
>Cylinders - 59554
>Heads - 16 <---
>Sectors - 63
>Size - 29312
>
>Platters - 3
>Heads per surface - 1
>
>If my drive has 3 platters and a surface has one head, why the "Heads"
>value is 16? I suppose they are different concepts... or not?
>How is the "Heads" value calculated?
Welcome to the world of backwards-combatability.
Short version: Your disk drive is lying to the BIOS so the BIOS doesn't
freak out.
Long version: Back in the early 80s, when hard disks were introduced to
the PC world, the BIOS writers made a number of design decisions that
still plague us today. Originally, they decided that the disk
controller should access the disk directly, and that no hard drive would
have more than 16 heads, 1024 cylinders, and 63 sectors/track. This
imposed a limit of 504M on hard disk size, but then, 20M was almost
unimaginably huge.
ALmost immediately, they ran into the fact that few drives had more than
8 physical heads, but disk drives were increasing in capacity quickly.
So they invented C/H/S translation. Therefore, to DOS and the BIOS, a
drive with 4 physical heads, 63 sectors/track, and 2048 cylinders showed
up as one with 8 heads and 1024 cylinders.
Drives got bigger, and various other hacks were made to increase the
limit on the number of logical heads to 255, and the number of logical
cylinders to... um, 65536 or 131072.
Modern IDE disks really operate in the way SCSI disks always have--each
512-byte sector on the disk is given a unique (32-bit) number, and the
driver passes this number to the disk to indicate which sector it wants
to read or write. The drive's logic board takes care of mapping this
number to a physical location on the disk. This Linear Block Addressing
(LBA) scheme has many advantages over the old C/H/S system, but... for
backwards combatability, DOS and the BIOS expect to see a C/H/S disk
geometry.
The book _Upgrading And Repairing PCs_ (ISBN 0-7897-1903-7) has a lot of
information on this topic, and many other things to do with PC hardware.
If you're really interested in this sort of thing, it's a good buy.
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
http://www.brainbench.com / Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
=============================/ I hit a seg fault....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reader of news)
Subject: any experience with cobalt?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11 Mar 2001 20:06:41 -0500
I've a lot experience with redhat on
x86 platform and have a web server
hosted on rackspace.com
Anyway I need another cheaper one
to do a back up + plus some less interactive back end
jobs and cobalt servers are the cheapest
they have.
My feeling of cobalt is weird. I just
don't know what they heck they are made of
even though they say it's an x86 processor
As far as software goes how different are they
from redhat. I wish to install 2.4 kernel on
it and wondering if there are any special
issue I need aware of
Thanks
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.hardware.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
