Linux-Hardware Digest #468, Volume #9 Sat, 20 Feb 99 02:13:43 EST
Contents:
Re: Zip 250: is it supported by Linux 2.0.x kernel ? (Kyle Dansie)
printer problem, new ghostscript install messes up printtool/printfilters (doug)
Problem with Linksys network card? (snowman)
Re: MEMORY UPGRADE on M571 (Heath Doane)
Re: Same Disk RAID and Mirroring (Ralf-Peter Rohbeck)
SB128PCI + 2.2.1 + Slackware (Don Judd)
Re: Mastrox Millenium G200 AGP and XFree (Eric Lee Green)
Re: Maxtor 13.6GB Ultra DMA Hard Drive (Eric Lee Green)
Re: ADSL and Linux (James)
Re: SMC Tulip (Eric Lee Green)
Re: X with STB Velocity 4400 on RH 5.1 (John McKee)
Re: Winmodems and Linux? (Michael David Jones)
Re: Pereos Tape Drive under Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Logitech Wireless Desktop ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Problem with RH5.1 install and built in Adaptec aic7840 SCSI adapter ("Colin
Stefani")
Re: Lexmark 1100 Color Jetprinter & Redhat 5.1 ("Jeff")
RedHat-5.2 and Brother MFC-7160C Color Inkjet Printer (Maxim Bazhenov)
How much information is on the NET about YOU? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: 1GB Syquest SparQ drive under Linux (waco)
Re: S3 Trio 3D 4Mb AGP (Grant Leslie)
ISA SERIAL PNP, NO JUMPERS ("ComFuMasta")
Re: Midi MPU-401 not working! (Marc D. Williams)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 19:43:36 -0700
From: Kyle Dansie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Zip 250: is it supported by Linux 2.0.x kernel ?
PeP wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm still using a 2.0 kernel and I'm in plan to buy a Zip 250 drive.
> I wonder if it is supported by the Linux kernel I got before buying it ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Please post answers directly to my mail address, not the newsgroup.
>
> PeP
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it will work. Just use the IMM driver, same as the zip plus uses.
Details in the howto
Cheers,
Kyle Dansie
--
========================================================
Linux Rules Iomega Zip Drive Mini - HOWTO
-
http://njtcom.com/dansie/zip-drive.html
or
http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/ZIP-Drive.html
========================================================
------------------------------
From: doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: printer problem, new ghostscript install messes up printtool/printfilters
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:41:57 -0500
Hi,
I have major problems with my printer setup. I have a Epson 640 and the
thing use to work good, but the options were limited. I thought I'd
install the 5.10 version of ghostscript and see if any new things showed
up for this printer. After I installed however when it comes time to
select a filter I only have 2 options shown, plain text and postscript
(in printtool). Before I did the new install, It
showed the Epson as a choice along with many others, now there are none
except the 2 mentioned. Any ideas? Thanks for any input. Doug
------------------------------
From: snowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem with Linksys network card?
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 04:06:27 GMT
------------------------------
From: Heath Doane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MEMORY UPGRADE on M571
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 23:39:23 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi folks, i have a problem that i have no right answer, i have a generic PC
> with M571 motherboard, i have onboard 32MB SDRAM and i have another slot for
> DIMM memory, i wanted to know if i can upgrade it by adding a 64MB SDRAM or
> should i use another 32MB(SDRAM) as suggested in the manual, any useful tips
> or advice would be greatly appreciated. thanks mahesh
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
We used to sell those Houston boards (the M57x with PCChips on them)...
If memory serves, as long as the bigger dimm was in slot 0, they would
word (I do remember that the order on the board matter) - I had one with
96 megs of RAM, so it can be done 64 x 1, 32 x 1...
Good Luck
Heath
------------------------------
From: Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.arch,comp.arch.storage,alt.os.linux,comp.periphs
Subject: Re: Same Disk RAID and Mirroring
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 16:39:53 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Malcolm Weir wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Feb 1999 16:03:59 -0600, Andy Glew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> caused to
> appear as if it was written:
>
...
> >This is the big question that would kill or not kill the idea of single disk
> >RAID: error distributions. Apart from the anecdotal testimony that multiple
> >disks are better than one (fine, but not what I was talking about), I saw only
> >one piece of evidence about error distributions --- the fellow who said that
> >radial scratches were a common error mode. Radial scratches would allow
> >the parity block to be put on the same track as the data block.
>
> Actually, they don't.
Depends. Radial scratches can be caused by manufacturing (head merge), in which case
they would be replaced during factory testing. The second cause for (diagonal) radial
scratches is bumps during operation while the drive is seeking. Truly radial
scratches don't happen any more, they were caused by actuators coming loose during
transport. That kills today's drives via stiction in the non-textured recording zone.
Bump scratches are circumferential when the drive isn't seeking of course, but more
probably today you would see several rectangular head footprints from head slap - the
air bearing is quite stiff, and only when the head tilts while bouncing it hits the
media with the slider corners.
Otherwise, defects are randomly distributed - while the drive is ok. When it starts to
exhibit bad blocks from debris, there is strong locality - on the same surface, on
nearby tracks.
Actually, watching error rates, bad block replacements and ECC corrections during
operation (e.g. SMART) guards against impending hard errors very well so you know
beforehand when things start to go wrong.
...
> Secondly, to compensate for the above, there is a large ECC segment for each
> sector following the user data.
Concurred. Either a sector is good or or uncorrectably bad. There is no such thing as
bits any more. They are scrambled, randomized and channel encoded away.
>
> To eliminate the need for separate servo tracks, each sector also has a
> preamble, which basically delineates the start of the sector.
Today's drives are id-less. The preamble doesn't contain any data, it just serves to
prime the preamps and PLL. If it is damaged the data can usually still be read with
retries and trickery.
...
> More likely, though, the combination of the damage, the RLL, and the head
> deafening effect (which disk people call something else) will be too severe
> for ECC to recover, resulting in an unreadable block. The higher-level RAID
> logic would then recreate the missing data, and all would be well...
Not really. The 'head deafening' is called thermal asperity and is caused by MR
element heatup from debris hits or (near-) contact with the media. It is usually quite
short (until the bias control loop kicks in) and is often correctable.
>
> HOWEVER... there is absolutely no reason to presume that our radial scratch
> will be kind enough to occur within the data area of the sector. Suppose it
> occurs towards the end of the ECC segment. Even though the user data is
> fine, by corrupting the ECC the drive *has* to determine that the sector is
> unreadable...
No. Don't confuse ECC with CRC. The drive knows that the data is ok by virtue of a
correct CRC. Only when the CRC fails the drive looks at the ECC.
>IN ADDITION, the scratch may have resulted in the drive being
> unable to read the preamble for the next sector, which means that the
> adjacent sector is also unreadable.
In which case it will retry, 'coast' through the preamble and will still be able to
read the data. Maybe with a few correctable wrong bits in the beginning while the PLL
gets in sync.
Same disk RAID will give you a little bit of additional safety - only if you put the
parity on a head far away from the data (if you are lucky enough to know about the
precise drive geometry.) But combined with SMART et.al. it might help because you will
rarely get surprised by catastrophical disk failure.
Just my 2 cents...
Ralf-Peter
--
Ralf-Peter Rohbeck - DLT/SSPG specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quantum GmbH-Application Engineering-Central Europe (+49) 69-950767-18
Berner Str. 28, 60437 Frankfurt, Germany fax (+49) 69-950767-91,-92
------------------------------
From: Don Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SB128PCI + 2.2.1 + Slackware
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 21:53:47 -0700
Sorry for any redundancy on this issue:
I am currently running 2.2.1 kernel on a Slackware system. Today I
bought a new SB 128 to replace my SB Vibra 16 PNP.
I am aware that RedHat can detect and configure these cards, but using
Slackware I am not aware of any feature that does this. In the past I
have initialized my PnP card through DOS, but to my knowledge there is
no DOS level configuration for the PCI 128.
I am sure someone has gotten this mix to work, can anyone point me
towards a document that might get me going? Thanks in advance, and my
appologies if this one has been answered a million times.
:-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Lee Green)
Subject: Re: Mastrox Millenium G200 AGP and XFree
Date: 20 Feb 1999 04:54:33 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:50:25 -0300, Christian Tagtachian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I would like to know how well this card is supported...
>I read that XFree supports it, but it doesn't state if it is the AGP or PCI
>version... I am about to get
>an AGP one, and wanted to be sure it works ok before I do.
The AGP one is the original one. It works quite well. We used to sell
the Matrox Millenium G200 AGP on all of our high-end machines, until
we switched to the Diamond Viper 550 (Riva TNT chipset), which ended
up being about the same price while potentially having much better
performance (right now they perform about the same under "X" due to
the fact that TNT support is quite new, but the TNT is a faster chip
in most respects). Actually we wanted to use another TNT board, but
our suppliers seem to be hung up on Diamond -- they stock thousands of
Diamonds, and thousands of ATI boards, and no ASUS or Hercules or etc.
boards :-(.
--
Eric Lee Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux-hw.com/~eric
Beware of those who would sell you a 7200RPM Quantum as an
Enterprise-class hard drive.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Lee Green)
Subject: Re: Maxtor 13.6GB Ultra DMA Hard Drive
Date: 20 Feb 1999 05:01:26 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:34:56 GMT, Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Currently, CompUSA has a US$30 rebate for the above drive and the price
>after
>the rebate is US$199. This sounds like a good bargain. I am thinking to
>purchase one and use it as the main hard drive for my web server under
>Linux.
>Is it a good idea to use this Maxtor 13.6GB Ultra DMA hard drive as the main
>hard drive for a web server under Linux?
How big of a load are we talking?
The web server for Linux Hardware Solutions is an old Pentium 166 with
a 1gb IDE hard drive and 64mb of memory, co-located at our ISP. It
doesn't even breathe hard under a load of couple thousand hits an
hour. The load factor is stuck down at 0.1 to 0.3.
On the other hand, if you are running cnn.com you might want a little more
horsepower :-).
In short: Unless you're serving a really big load, that's a perfectly
fine drive for a web server under Linux. Just don't try to run
Slashdot off of it!
--
Eric Lee Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux-hw.com/~eric
"Microsoft will compete ... by adding features" -- Ed Muth, Microsoft
"Code bloat is never an acceptable solution" -- Me.
------------------------------
From: James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ADSL and Linux
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:17:48 -0400
I'm using ADSL with no problems. Although I haven't installed X yet. (I'm a
newbie and I would like to become very familiar with the command prompt), I am
able to ping anywhere I like so I assume all is well. The IP address is set on
the box itself, and not the NIC, so run DHCP.
Miguel Cruz wrote:
> Nat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone ever installed ADSL modem on linux box? ... I get a good deal
> > with ADSL service with a frem ADSL Modem. I have no idea how that modem is
> > going to work with my box.
>
> I have Bell Atlantic ADSL service with a Westell external modem. It took all
> of 5 minutes to set up, ethernet card and all. God bless that clever kernel.
> It recognized the card automatically, all I had to do was stick a few
> 'ifconfig' and 'route' commands in the inet rc file.
>
> miguel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Lee Green)
Subject: Re: SMC Tulip
Date: 20 Feb 1999 05:07:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999 14:28:09 -0500, matthew.r.pavlovich.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I am able to get the driver to load and recognize the card, no link and no
>data connection. Any ideas? Kernel 2.2.1 w/ driver patched from 0.89 to
>0.90 (latest)
*WHICH* driver?
Hmm, the numbers you quote make me think you are using the Tulip driver.
I have noticed that the Tulip driver has some troubles with media detection
on certain cards. In fact, we don't use it with the DE-500 cards that we
sell with our systems for exactly that reason -- we use the de4x5 driver.
You may wish to see if the de4x5 driver works. If not, you may wish to go
back to an earlier version of the tulip drive... 0.90 has some known issues
(media detection, anybody?!). Last tulip I had that worked any good was
0.88, but I don't think that runs under 2.2.1 :-(.
--
Eric Lee Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux-hw.com/~eric
"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you.
Then you win." -- Ghandi
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKee)
Subject: Re: X with STB Velocity 4400 on RH 5.1
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 05:07:02 GMT
A little hunting turned up Metro Link (www.metrolink.com) and their product (Metro-X)
has done the
job beautifully.
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 15:48:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKee) wrote:
>I just installed RH 5.1 on a GW2K which has the STB Velocity 4400 video card with
>16MB of RAM.
>I've tried configuring (Xcofigurator) about a dozen times, but always get an error
>stating that
>resolution couldn't be resolved. It also shows on 64KB of RAM. During the
>Xconfigurator session,
>when selecting the amount of video RAM, the largest size is 8MB, so that's what I've
>been selecting.
>
>I've been to the STB site (www.stb.com), but there's no mention of Linux there.
>
>Any help is greatly appreciated. I left DOS awhile ago, and have lost my
>appreciation of the
>command line interface.
John McKee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael David Jones)
Subject: Re: Winmodems and Linux?
Date: 19 Feb 1999 00:09:40 -0500
John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>~The Seventh Sign~ wrote:
>> No drivers for winmodems and there should never be any drivers for
>> winmodems they hog CPU resources. It is like having a bicycle car when you
>> need a motorized car.
>I saw an interesting analogy on another group: the Winmodem
>is like a Flintstone's car in that the driver(cpu) has to
>supply all motive power.
Fine, as long as you don't give any grief to anybody who says they're
going to use Windows because peripherals are cheaper.
Mike Jones | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Fundamental Laws of Physics and the Universe:
F=MA.
You Can't Push With A Rope.
Everything Else Is Magic.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Pereos Tape Drive under Linux
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:55:03 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Tape drive hooked up to the parallel port]
>I would really like to be able to use this natively under Linux. I'm
>currently on 2.0.36. Anyone got any info or ideas on getting this
>working ??
Perhaps it's a IDE-to-parallel or scsi-to-parallel thingy? Then look at
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/paride.txt
Is there any *real* documentation available for the device?
HTH,
Uli
--
Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stormweg 24 |listening to: Spanish Bombs (The Clash), Windy (The
24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Decibels), Jackie (The Decibels)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Logitech Wireless Desktop
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 23:41:42 GMT
HI all...
I own a Logitech wireless desktop. Well, the keyboard works
just honky dory with linux oddly enough. But the mouse is one entirely
different story. It acts very erratically. Anyone out there know a
solution for this little problem?
Andy
------------------------------
From: "Colin Stefani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Problem with RH5.1 install and built in Adaptec aic7840 SCSI adapter
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 21:40:24 -0800
I have an Intel 440BX motherboard with dual Proc. Slots (I'm only using one
proc tho) and the motherboard has an Adaptec aci-7840 shipset Ultra-SCSI2
adapter built in.
I am trying to install RH 5.1 (I just started to download 5.2 with the 2.2
kernal update, but thought I'd try 5.1 first). The main HD is on the SCSI
adapter and the only IDE device is the CD-ROM.
The bios sees it just fine, but when I boot to the CD-ROM kernal and do the
SCSI set-up, it can't auto-probe it and I can't find anything that relates
to the parameters I need to use to pass to the module.
Has anyone else had experience with this, or can point me in the right
direction?
Am I just stuck until I get 5.2 all ready to install?
I've checked LDP, extensivly searched usenet, and the web and can't find too
much help so far.
any help is appreciated greatly.
-colin stefani
------------------------------
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Lexmark 1100 Color Jetprinter & Redhat 5.1
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 22:58:01 -0700
Lexmark printers are "Windows only" printers. You have a better chance of
getting hit by lightning than getting that printer to work ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7aedn4$rt1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi All:
>
> I've installed Redhat 5.1 on my PC. I recently purchased the Lexmark 1100
>Color Jetprinter. Judging from several postings in this and other
newsgroups,
>Lexmark does not provide drivers for Linux (Fat chance!!), and Linux
(RedHat,
>Debian, Suse, etc.??) does not support Lexmark printers. However, the
>printer's manual does say that it is compatible with HP Deskjet 500C
drivers.
>This is listed in Redhat's printer compatibility list. So, I installed the
HP
>Deskjet 500C filter. But, I am still unable to print anything. Either a
blank
>page gets printed or the printer head(??) prints everything on the same
spot
>(leaving a big messy blot on the paper). Is there anybody out there with
more
>experience with this type of problem? Should I set something in the CMOS
>setup (Bidirectional printing??), or maybe disable PostScript printing, or
>install it as a plain, old text-only printer?
>
>Any hints would be appreciated.
>
>Thanx in advance,
>Swaroop ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Maxim Bazhenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: RedHat-5.2 and Brother MFC-7160C Color Inkjet Printer
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:56:27 -0800
Hi, I am going to buy a multifunctional printer and so far my first choice
is Brother MFC-7160C Color Inkjet Printer. However the short description at WWW
tells that Windows 95/98/NT is required. Does anybody has an experience
with using this printer at Linux box? Which functions can I lose using
Linux? Thanks a lot for any response.
Maxim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How much information is on the NET about YOU?
Date: Friday, 19 Feb 1999 23:48:08 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How much information is on the NET about YOU?
Find out here: http://investigator.cjb.net
------------------------------
From: waco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 1GB Syquest SparQ drive under Linux
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 20:10:58 -0500
Randy Cooper wrote:
> I have had the IDE version of the Sparq drive since kernel version
> 2.0.32. It is the slave of the primary IDE controller (i.e. /dev/hdb). It
> has worked just fine. I didn't have to do anyting special to get it
> running.
>
> Does your query mean that SuQuest is back in business?
>
> Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mail checked week nights and weekends).
>
> On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Bill Gates wrote:
>
> > Does any of you guys out there got this drive?
> > Can you get it running under Linux?
> > I would like to make it to work under Linux, is it possible?
> >
Yes They're back in business (bought by Iomega)
------------------------------
From: Grant Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: S3 Trio 3D 4Mb AGP
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 02:29:00 -0400
I also have a Trio 3D, it does work using the Frame buffer device, but,
I would love a "true" accel Xserver, but, that isn't expected until
XFree86 4. I suspect what the other guy is talking about is a Virge 3D
DX card, not a Trio 3D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> How did you get it to work? What server are you using? Can you get more than
> 16 colors? Will you share your /etc/X11/XF86Config?
>
> thanks,
> Michele
--
"It looks so lovely, and fragile. Imagine how many millions of people
are living on it, and don't even realize how fragile it is."
Alan B. Shepard, 1971, said with a tear in his eye, on the
Apollo 14 mission looking back at earth from the moon
------------------------------
From: "ComFuMasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISA SERIAL PNP, NO JUMPERS
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 06:34:05 GMT
I am running RH 5.1. I got my modem to work in windows. it is on com2.
irq3. i have tried minicom, seyon, and even manually. when i try minicom it
goes to initialize and it doesnt give me the ok. also when i boot up. it
doesnt show any ports or ppp. i am hell of new to linux. i want to learn it
but i just cant see myself on it without a connection. i have been told to
disable my com2 in the bios, i tried it a while back and it did not work.
when i used seyon, it said wrong port or try recompiling and set
HAVE_MODEM_CONTROL to no. i dont know how to recompile seyon. i have
configured a modem before and i have been trying to get this modem to work
for about 3mos now. please help.
thanx in advance.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc D. Williams)
Subject: Re: Midi MPU-401 not working!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 19 Feb 1999 03:25:27 -0800
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 16:10:57 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>-- having problem using my MIDI-cards
>
>I have one GUS classic 3.7 with MIDI-adapter
>and one Roland MPU401 IPC MIDI-interface.
>
>Can I use both midi-interfaces ?
>Does OSS support GUS-midi-interface.
>I`m not able to make use of my midi-syth with any of these.
>To be frankly I`m not shure how.
>
>Tryed playmidi on device 1 and 0 bu it gave me only this:
>playmidi -D 1 bluejam.mid
I don't have the GUS, just a simple ESS1868 card but I do have
it and an MPU-401 card working with the regular kernel sound
drivers (kernel 2.0.36).
Your sndstat looks okay. From what it looks like you only have
the MPU-401 card for MIDI. With playmidi use the `-e'
parameter for an external midi device.
playmidi -e bluejam.mid
It should send to the Roland IPC card.
If not maybe the /dev/ stuff is setup properly. Not sure.
--
>>ANIME SENSHI<<
Marc D. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.agate.net/~tvdog/internet.html -- DOS Internet
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Platform/8269/ -- Windows 3.x Makeover
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
