On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > checked out the doc. and i am absolutely sure it was 748.75 only. but there is > a problem now. i have a K7 and not a K6. and the doc says that is should clock > * 1.0 does the kernel recognise it as a K7 i mean does it know about k7 at all. If i remeber correctly it was recognised as a k6 in the cpuinfo you posted last time. sreangsu k7.....do i envy you :( ---------------------------------------------- LIH is all for free speech. But it was created for a purpose. Violations of the rules of this list will result in stern action.
- [LIH] bogomips blues? piyush . gupta
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? Sudhakar Chandra
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? Shanker Balan
- kernel 2.4 Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? sreangsu acharyya
- Re: kernel 2.4 Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? Shanker Balan
- Re: kernel 2.4 Re: [LIH] bogomips blues... sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? piyush . gupta
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? piyush . gupta
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? piyush . gupta
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? & /proc/cpuinfo sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? & /proc/cpuin... ambarish pathak
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? piyush . gupta
- Re: [LIH] bogomips blues? sreangsu acharyya
