On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:44:00AM +0530, Ashwin D wrote:
>On Sunday 08 April 2001 02:35, you wrote:
>> >
>> >No... it automagically detects it and enables UMDA/66.(at least it does on
>> >my machine)
>>
>> In my case, now what happens is, I had compiled the dma support in the
>> kernel and I was not using hdparm -d1 option to enable dma. Now after
>> putting the other able I have to use -d1 option of hdparm ? How this
>> happened any ideas ?
>
>If u are game try hdparm -X68 /dev/hda. Thatr should put it in udma 66 mode.
>
>In any case, if it has not made a diff (and hopefully i can corroborate
>'morrow) , i think we should accept that hdparm is prbly broken with
>i810+kernel 2.4 and try bonnie to get the hdd results.
If it is broken then how John is getting those throughputs. (only
difference is that he does not have i810 board ). That was
precisely the reason I wanted the version of hdparm on John's machine.
John .........
I have got the results of bonnie with the old cable. Now will tryout
bonnie with this new cable and see whether there is any difference in the
results.
--
Rajesh Fowkar
(Computer Programmer)
V. S. DEMPO & CO. LTD., PANAJI-GOA
Email ID : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site : http://www.dempos.com
----------------------------------------------
An alpha version of a web based tool to manage
your subscription with this mailing list is at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr
