On Monday 23 April 2001 14:12, Penguin wrote: > Will try at home. But I don't think it will be different for /dev/hda or > /dev/hdaN since partitions are on the same HDD. How can there be different > speeds for different partitions on the same Disk ? I got different results on office machine. Buffered cache reads were rougly 5% higher for partitions than the disk. Buffered disk reads were in fact slower in one case and same in other two.. Puzzled... Shridhar ---------------------------------------------- An alpha version of a web based tool to manage your subscription with this mailing list is at http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Kingsly John
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Ashwin D
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Rajesh Fowkar
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Ashwin D
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Ashwin D
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Kingsly John
- [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Penguin
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Ashwin D
- [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Penguin
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Raju Mathur
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Ashwin D
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Kingsly John
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: [LIH] Re: Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Ashwin D
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Rajesh Fowkar
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Ashwin D
- [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Penguin
- Re: [LIH] Re: hdparm with kernel2.4.1 Kingsly John
