On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:19:43PM +0530, shyamk @ eth . net wrote:
> 
> I am interested to know how the veteran Linux users
> and generally the  Linux  community compares Debian
> and Slackware.Which is better, if I may ask, and why ?
> 
---end quoted text---

These distro wars can go on forever, and never come to any
conclusion ....

I have had Slack installed on my box since 1995, and still
using it.

The second distro has varied from BestLinux (Linus Finnish
distro), RH, SuSE, and then debian Slink and Potato.  With
crash of my second HDD, my deb is out. Yes, I had also had
a fling with Rock ! Presently on Slack, Pygmy Linux and  a 
LFS under development ! .. those intending to go on to LFS
please note the term development, and NOT installation for
Linux-From-Scratch !

Slackware has the least frills, BSD type sys-admining  and
you do everything by hand. Extremely flexible, and enforc-
es no policies. Package management is through scripts. The
Disk #1, is about all that is needed. Rock stable, and you
can build anything on top of it ... I love the  freedom of
Slack. Incidentally, there is nothing like  upgrade  here.
You need to do selectively yourself ... Very good learning 
value. It is the nearest to other big-brother unices ..

Debian : A very cultured distro, perhaps a  bit  stiff  on 
its management policies. You hardly need anything which is
not apt-getable from the net. In the  stable release which 
is months behind other distros everything works. In  test-
ing most things work, in "unstable" nothing  works without
complaint! If one  is  not  inclined  towards doing things
from developer tarballs, this is perhaps the best way out.
Incidentally, it has Sys-V style sys-admining. Upgrade  is 
painless even across the net. It has one of the most  act-
ive user lists amongst all Linux distros with and  average
of about 150 mails a day. It however, does  not  cater for 
the freedom which Slack provides ... and  teaches  you bad
habits, because you never get to face the real problems of 
life under Linux without debian :-(

The choice is upto your inclination ...
 
Bish
                          
--
:
####[ Linux One Stanza Tip (LOST) ]###########################

Sub : Reducing processes needed                      LOST #105

An attempt should be made to  reduce number of processes where
ever possible ... example  "cat filename | less"  is valid but
evokes 2 processes. The same is possible with "less filename",
with only one process evoked.

####<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>########################################
:

_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to