On 15 May 2002 at 21:32, Sudhakar Chandra wrote: > And I gave you a potential solution, even though I would refuse to > implement it to for any employer.
I would just like to extrapolate the sequence of events. 1)Your empoyer asks you do deploy an outright stupid policy. 2)You do it. 3)Users find ways to get past whatever restriction you put in and they keep doing that. 4)The system fails. 5)If your employer is dumb enough(I stress on enough. I know he is dumb..), he fires you.. A win win situation for an admin would be do exactly as suggested by his manager. Likely the scheme is going to have more holes than if admin has poured his true efforts whole heartedly. He has to keep reporting the failures and that's it. Someday manager will give up because he can not come up with any smarter ideas. Only real risk in this is it would encourage tendency cracking among users. It's a very real risk and I won't advise it unless you have another job ready at hand. And if your employer wants to restrict people so much, why give every of them an email id? Just give to people who need it. Only justification to this scheme is bandwidth cost and I would say it may be justifiable for a business. Bye Shridhar -- A woman should have compassion. -- Kirk, "Catspaw", stardate 3018.2 _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
