Hi,
I did read through the patches you sent. I disagree violently
at the following difference between patch-2.4-test6-irda1 and
patch-2.4-test6-irda2 :
---------------------------------------
--- linux-2.4.0-test6/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c Tue Mar 21 20:17:28 2000
-+++ linux-2.4.0-test6-irda-patch/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c Sun Aug 13 21:57:25
2000
++++ linux-2.4.0-test6-irda-patch/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c Sun Aug 20 09:56:25
+2000
-@@ -233,8 +233,14 @@ static int irtty_open(struct tty_struct
+@@ -233,8 +233,6 @@ static int irtty_open(struct tty_struct
ERROR(__FUNCTION__ "(), dev_alloc() failed!\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
-+
-+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= 0x020362 /* 2.3.99-pre7 */
-+ /* dev_alloc doesn't clear the struct (Yuck !!!) */
-+ memset(((__u8*)dev)+IFNAMSIZ,0,sizeof(struct net_device)-IFNAMSIZ);
-+#else
- /* dev_alloc doesn't clear the struct */
- memset(((__u8*)dev)+sizeof(char*),0,sizeof(struct net_device)-sizeof(char*));
-+#endif /* LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= 0x020362 */
+- /* dev_alloc doesn't clear the struct */
+- memset(((__u8*)dev)+sizeof(char*),0,sizeof(struct net_device)-sizeof(char*));
dev->priv = (void *) self;
self->netdev = dev;
---------------------------------------
Just try to use 2 dongles or read my previous e-mail on why.
Apart from that, all other changes look nice. I still need to
try it out ;-)
Jean
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
