>> Am I the only software developer so far who would dare to reconsider
>> implementation details from three status functions?
Thanks for this kind of promising feedback.
> But we're waiting for you showing is that it is an improvement.
Can this aspect also be clarified to some degree from a logical point of view?
* Would you really like to know under which circumstances data processing
will be faster for a single character instead of using a string pointer
and corresponding two characters?
* Do you care for a changed memory allocation characteristic?
* Will it occasionally be useful to avoid the storage for another string