On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:01 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch just fixes the checkpatch warnings.

unrelated trivia:

> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
[]
> @@ -538,15 +538,14 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>       devfreq = find_device_devfreq(dev);
>       mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>       if (!IS_ERR(devfreq)) {
> -             dev_err(dev, "%s: Unable to create devfreq for the device. It 
> already has one.\n", __func__);
> +             dev_err(dev, "%s: Unable to create devfreq for the device.\n",
> +                     __func__);
>               err = -EINVAL;
>               goto err_out;
>       }

It seems to be simpler if find_device_devfreq just returned NULL
in the error cases as the only test is IS_ERR and not a
specific error return type.  Then these IS_ERR calls could be
a NULL pointer test instead.

> @@ -576,11 +575,13 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>               goto err_out;
>       }
>  
> -     devfreq->trans_table =  devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned 
> int) *
> +     devfreq->trans_table =  devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> +                                             sizeof(unsigned int) *
>                                               devfreq->profile->max_state *
>                                               devfreq->profile->max_state,
>                                               GFP_KERNEL);
> -     devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned 
> long) *
> +     devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> +                                             sizeof(unsigned long) *
>                                               devfreq->profile->max_state,
>                                               GFP_KERNEL);

Maybe these should be devm_kcalloc calls

>       devfreq->last_stat_updated = jiffies;
> @@ -990,7 +991,7 @@ static ssize_t cur_freq_show(struct device *dev, struct 
> device_attribute *attr,
>  
>       if (devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq &&
>               !devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq(devfreq->dev.parent, &freq))
> -                     return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", freq);
> +             return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", freq);

Be nicer to align the second line in the if test here too

        if (devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq &&
            !devfreq->profile->get_cur_freq(devfreq->dev.parent, &freq))
                return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", freq); 

>       return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", devfreq->previous_freq);
>  }

Reply via email to