On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 19:46 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 2016년 11월 24일 19:20, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:01 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > > This patch just fixes the checkpatch warnings. > > > > unrelated trivia: > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c [] > > > @@ -576,11 +575,13 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device > > > *dev, > > > goto err_out; > > > } > > > > > > - devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned > > > int) * > > > + devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, > > > + sizeof(unsigned int) * > > > devfreq->profile->max_state * > > > devfreq->profile->max_state, > > > GFP_KERNEL); > > > - devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned > > > long) * > > > + devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, > > > + sizeof(unsigned long) * > > > devfreq->profile->max_state, > > > GFP_KERNEL); > > > > Maybe these should be devm_kcalloc calls > > Why should devfreq use the devm_kcalloc?
Because these are allocating zeroed arrays of a specific size.
