On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:37:59PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Processor local interrupts really should be architected and there are > really not that many of them.
And that is what they are. > But well, RISC-V decided obvsiouly not to learn from mistakes made by > others. I don't think that is the case. I think Atup misreads what reserved means - if you look at section 2.3 of the RISC-V privileged spec it clearly states that reserved fields are for future use and not for vendor specific use.
